Cargando…

Does interpregnancy BMI change affect the risk of complications in the second pregnancy? Analysis of pooled data from Aberdeen, Finland and Malta

OBJECTIVE: Weight management interventions during pregnancy have had limited success in reducing the risk of pregnancy complications. Focus has now shifted to pre-pregnancy counselling to optimise body weight before subsequent conception. We aimed to assess the effect of interpregnancy body mass ind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McClurg, Dylan Peter, Gissler, Mika, Gatt, Miriam, Wallace, Jacqueline, Bhattacharya, Sohinee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34608251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00971-7
_version_ 1784630973615308800
author McClurg, Dylan Peter
Gissler, Mika
Gatt, Miriam
Wallace, Jacqueline
Bhattacharya, Sohinee
author_facet McClurg, Dylan Peter
Gissler, Mika
Gatt, Miriam
Wallace, Jacqueline
Bhattacharya, Sohinee
author_sort McClurg, Dylan Peter
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Weight management interventions during pregnancy have had limited success in reducing the risk of pregnancy complications. Focus has now shifted to pre-pregnancy counselling to optimise body weight before subsequent conception. We aimed to assess the effect of interpregnancy body mass index (BMI) change on the risk of perinatal complications in the second pregnancy. METHODS: A cohort study was performed using pooled maternity data from Aberdeen, Finland and Malta. Women with a BMI change of ±2 kg/m(2) between their first and second pregnancies were compared with those who were BMI stable (remained within ±2 kg/m(2)). Outcomes assessed included pre-eclampsia (PE), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm birth, birth weight, and stillbirth in the second pregnancy. We also assessed the effect of unit change in BMI for PE and IUGR. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: An increase of ≥2 kg/m(2) between the first two pregnancies increased the risk of PE (1.66 (1.49–1.86)) and high birthweight (>4000 g) (1.06 (1.03–1.10)). A reduction of ≥2 kg/m(2) increased the chance of IUGR (1.15 (1.01–1.31)) and preterm birth (1.14 (1.01–1.30)), while reducing the risk of instrumental delivery (0.75 (0.68–0.85)) and high birthweight (0.93 (0.87–0.98)). Reducing BMI did not significantly decrease PE risk in women with obesity or those with previous PE. A history of PE or IUGR in the first pregnancy was the strongest predictor of recurrence independent of interpregnancy BMI change (5.75 (5.30–6.24) and (7.44 (6.71–8.25), respectively). CONCLUSION: Changes in interpregnancy BMI have a modest impact on the risk of high birthweight, PE and IUGR in contrasting directions. However, a prior history of PE and IUGR is the dominant predictor of recurrence at second pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8748194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87481942022-01-20 Does interpregnancy BMI change affect the risk of complications in the second pregnancy? Analysis of pooled data from Aberdeen, Finland and Malta McClurg, Dylan Peter Gissler, Mika Gatt, Miriam Wallace, Jacqueline Bhattacharya, Sohinee Int J Obes (Lond) Article OBJECTIVE: Weight management interventions during pregnancy have had limited success in reducing the risk of pregnancy complications. Focus has now shifted to pre-pregnancy counselling to optimise body weight before subsequent conception. We aimed to assess the effect of interpregnancy body mass index (BMI) change on the risk of perinatal complications in the second pregnancy. METHODS: A cohort study was performed using pooled maternity data from Aberdeen, Finland and Malta. Women with a BMI change of ±2 kg/m(2) between their first and second pregnancies were compared with those who were BMI stable (remained within ±2 kg/m(2)). Outcomes assessed included pre-eclampsia (PE), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm birth, birth weight, and stillbirth in the second pregnancy. We also assessed the effect of unit change in BMI for PE and IUGR. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: An increase of ≥2 kg/m(2) between the first two pregnancies increased the risk of PE (1.66 (1.49–1.86)) and high birthweight (>4000 g) (1.06 (1.03–1.10)). A reduction of ≥2 kg/m(2) increased the chance of IUGR (1.15 (1.01–1.31)) and preterm birth (1.14 (1.01–1.30)), while reducing the risk of instrumental delivery (0.75 (0.68–0.85)) and high birthweight (0.93 (0.87–0.98)). Reducing BMI did not significantly decrease PE risk in women with obesity or those with previous PE. A history of PE or IUGR in the first pregnancy was the strongest predictor of recurrence independent of interpregnancy BMI change (5.75 (5.30–6.24) and (7.44 (6.71–8.25), respectively). CONCLUSION: Changes in interpregnancy BMI have a modest impact on the risk of high birthweight, PE and IUGR in contrasting directions. However, a prior history of PE and IUGR is the dominant predictor of recurrence at second pregnancy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8748194/ /pubmed/34608251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00971-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
McClurg, Dylan Peter
Gissler, Mika
Gatt, Miriam
Wallace, Jacqueline
Bhattacharya, Sohinee
Does interpregnancy BMI change affect the risk of complications in the second pregnancy? Analysis of pooled data from Aberdeen, Finland and Malta
title Does interpregnancy BMI change affect the risk of complications in the second pregnancy? Analysis of pooled data from Aberdeen, Finland and Malta
title_full Does interpregnancy BMI change affect the risk of complications in the second pregnancy? Analysis of pooled data from Aberdeen, Finland and Malta
title_fullStr Does interpregnancy BMI change affect the risk of complications in the second pregnancy? Analysis of pooled data from Aberdeen, Finland and Malta
title_full_unstemmed Does interpregnancy BMI change affect the risk of complications in the second pregnancy? Analysis of pooled data from Aberdeen, Finland and Malta
title_short Does interpregnancy BMI change affect the risk of complications in the second pregnancy? Analysis of pooled data from Aberdeen, Finland and Malta
title_sort does interpregnancy bmi change affect the risk of complications in the second pregnancy? analysis of pooled data from aberdeen, finland and malta
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34608251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00971-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mcclurgdylanpeter doesinterpregnancybmichangeaffecttheriskofcomplicationsinthesecondpregnancyanalysisofpooleddatafromaberdeenfinlandandmalta
AT gisslermika doesinterpregnancybmichangeaffecttheriskofcomplicationsinthesecondpregnancyanalysisofpooleddatafromaberdeenfinlandandmalta
AT gattmiriam doesinterpregnancybmichangeaffecttheriskofcomplicationsinthesecondpregnancyanalysisofpooleddatafromaberdeenfinlandandmalta
AT wallacejacqueline doesinterpregnancybmichangeaffecttheriskofcomplicationsinthesecondpregnancyanalysisofpooleddatafromaberdeenfinlandandmalta
AT bhattacharyasohinee doesinterpregnancybmichangeaffecttheriskofcomplicationsinthesecondpregnancyanalysisofpooleddatafromaberdeenfinlandandmalta