Cargando…

Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model

PURPOSE: Compared with photon cranial radiation therapy (X-CRT), proton cranial radiation therapy (P-CRT) offers potential advantages in limiting radiation-induced sequalae in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. This study aims to identify cognitive, functional magnetic resonance and positron e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Tien T., Zawaski, Janice A., Kesler, Shelli, Beamish, Christine A., Inoue, Taeko, Perez, Emma C., Bronk, Lawrence, Poenisch, Falk, Briere, Tina M., Sabek, Omaima M., Grosshans, David R., Gaber, M. Waleed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34509550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.005
_version_ 1784630991121285120
author Tang, Tien T.
Zawaski, Janice A.
Kesler, Shelli
Beamish, Christine A.
Inoue, Taeko
Perez, Emma C.
Bronk, Lawrence
Poenisch, Falk
Briere, Tina M.
Sabek, Omaima M.
Grosshans, David R.
Gaber, M. Waleed
author_facet Tang, Tien T.
Zawaski, Janice A.
Kesler, Shelli
Beamish, Christine A.
Inoue, Taeko
Perez, Emma C.
Bronk, Lawrence
Poenisch, Falk
Briere, Tina M.
Sabek, Omaima M.
Grosshans, David R.
Gaber, M. Waleed
author_sort Tang, Tien T.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Compared with photon cranial radiation therapy (X-CRT), proton cranial radiation therapy (P-CRT) offers potential advantages in limiting radiation-induced sequalae in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. This study aims to identify cognitive, functional magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography imaging markers and molecular differences between the radiation modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Juvenile rats received a single faction of 10 Gy (relative biological effectiveness−weighted dose) delivered with 6 MV X-CRT or at the midspread out Bragg peak of a 100 MeV P-CRT beam. At 3, 6, and 12 months post-CRT, executive function was measured using 5-choice serial reaction time task. At ~12 months post-CRT, animals were imaged with (18)F-Flurodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography imaging followed by functional ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging and stained for markers of neuroinflammation. RESULTS: Irradiated animals had cognitive impairment with a higher number of omissions and lower incorrect and premature responses compared with sham (P ≤ .05). The accuracy of the animals’ X-CRT was less than that of sham (P ≤ .001). No significant difference in rates of cognitive change were found between the radiation modalities. At 12 months post-CRT, glucose metabolism was significantly higher than sham in X-CRT (P = .04) but not P-CRT. Using diffusion tensor imaging, P-CRT brains were found to have higher white matter volume and fiber lengths compared with sham (P < .03). Only X-CRT animals had higher apparent diffusion coefficient values compared with sham (P = .04). P-CRT animals had more connectomic changes compared with X-CRT. Correlative analysis identified several imaging features with cognitive performance. Further-more, microgliosis (P < .05), astrogliosis (P < .01), and myelin thinning (P <.05) were observed in both radiation modalities, with X-CRT showing slightly more inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Both P-CRT and X-CRT lead to neurocognitive changes compared with sham. Although no significant difference was observed in neuroinflammation between the irradiated groups, differences were found in late-term glucose metabolism and brain connectome. Our results indicate that despite relative biological effectiveness weighting of the proton dose there are still differential effects which warrants further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8748279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87482792022-02-01 Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model Tang, Tien T. Zawaski, Janice A. Kesler, Shelli Beamish, Christine A. Inoue, Taeko Perez, Emma C. Bronk, Lawrence Poenisch, Falk Briere, Tina M. Sabek, Omaima M. Grosshans, David R. Gaber, M. Waleed Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Article PURPOSE: Compared with photon cranial radiation therapy (X-CRT), proton cranial radiation therapy (P-CRT) offers potential advantages in limiting radiation-induced sequalae in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. This study aims to identify cognitive, functional magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography imaging markers and molecular differences between the radiation modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Juvenile rats received a single faction of 10 Gy (relative biological effectiveness−weighted dose) delivered with 6 MV X-CRT or at the midspread out Bragg peak of a 100 MeV P-CRT beam. At 3, 6, and 12 months post-CRT, executive function was measured using 5-choice serial reaction time task. At ~12 months post-CRT, animals were imaged with (18)F-Flurodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography imaging followed by functional ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging and stained for markers of neuroinflammation. RESULTS: Irradiated animals had cognitive impairment with a higher number of omissions and lower incorrect and premature responses compared with sham (P ≤ .05). The accuracy of the animals’ X-CRT was less than that of sham (P ≤ .001). No significant difference in rates of cognitive change were found between the radiation modalities. At 12 months post-CRT, glucose metabolism was significantly higher than sham in X-CRT (P = .04) but not P-CRT. Using diffusion tensor imaging, P-CRT brains were found to have higher white matter volume and fiber lengths compared with sham (P < .03). Only X-CRT animals had higher apparent diffusion coefficient values compared with sham (P = .04). P-CRT animals had more connectomic changes compared with X-CRT. Correlative analysis identified several imaging features with cognitive performance. Further-more, microgliosis (P < .05), astrogliosis (P < .01), and myelin thinning (P <.05) were observed in both radiation modalities, with X-CRT showing slightly more inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Both P-CRT and X-CRT lead to neurocognitive changes compared with sham. Although no significant difference was observed in neuroinflammation between the irradiated groups, differences were found in late-term glucose metabolism and brain connectome. Our results indicate that despite relative biological effectiveness weighting of the proton dose there are still differential effects which warrants further investigation. 2022-02-01 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8748279/ /pubmed/34509550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.005 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Article
Tang, Tien T.
Zawaski, Janice A.
Kesler, Shelli
Beamish, Christine A.
Inoue, Taeko
Perez, Emma C.
Bronk, Lawrence
Poenisch, Falk
Briere, Tina M.
Sabek, Omaima M.
Grosshans, David R.
Gaber, M. Waleed
Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model
title Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model
title_full Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model
title_fullStr Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model
title_short Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model
title_sort cognitive and imaging differences after proton and photon whole brain irradiation in a preclinical model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34509550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.005
work_keys_str_mv AT tangtient cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel
AT zawaskijanicea cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel
AT keslershelli cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel
AT beamishchristinea cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel
AT inouetaeko cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel
AT perezemmac cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel
AT bronklawrence cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel
AT poenischfalk cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel
AT brieretinam cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel
AT sabekomaimam cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel
AT grosshansdavidr cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel
AT gabermwaleed cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel