Cargando…
Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model
PURPOSE: Compared with photon cranial radiation therapy (X-CRT), proton cranial radiation therapy (P-CRT) offers potential advantages in limiting radiation-induced sequalae in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. This study aims to identify cognitive, functional magnetic resonance and positron e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34509550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.005 |
_version_ | 1784630991121285120 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Tien T. Zawaski, Janice A. Kesler, Shelli Beamish, Christine A. Inoue, Taeko Perez, Emma C. Bronk, Lawrence Poenisch, Falk Briere, Tina M. Sabek, Omaima M. Grosshans, David R. Gaber, M. Waleed |
author_facet | Tang, Tien T. Zawaski, Janice A. Kesler, Shelli Beamish, Christine A. Inoue, Taeko Perez, Emma C. Bronk, Lawrence Poenisch, Falk Briere, Tina M. Sabek, Omaima M. Grosshans, David R. Gaber, M. Waleed |
author_sort | Tang, Tien T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Compared with photon cranial radiation therapy (X-CRT), proton cranial radiation therapy (P-CRT) offers potential advantages in limiting radiation-induced sequalae in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. This study aims to identify cognitive, functional magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography imaging markers and molecular differences between the radiation modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Juvenile rats received a single faction of 10 Gy (relative biological effectiveness−weighted dose) delivered with 6 MV X-CRT or at the midspread out Bragg peak of a 100 MeV P-CRT beam. At 3, 6, and 12 months post-CRT, executive function was measured using 5-choice serial reaction time task. At ~12 months post-CRT, animals were imaged with (18)F-Flurodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography imaging followed by functional ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging and stained for markers of neuroinflammation. RESULTS: Irradiated animals had cognitive impairment with a higher number of omissions and lower incorrect and premature responses compared with sham (P ≤ .05). The accuracy of the animals’ X-CRT was less than that of sham (P ≤ .001). No significant difference in rates of cognitive change were found between the radiation modalities. At 12 months post-CRT, glucose metabolism was significantly higher than sham in X-CRT (P = .04) but not P-CRT. Using diffusion tensor imaging, P-CRT brains were found to have higher white matter volume and fiber lengths compared with sham (P < .03). Only X-CRT animals had higher apparent diffusion coefficient values compared with sham (P = .04). P-CRT animals had more connectomic changes compared with X-CRT. Correlative analysis identified several imaging features with cognitive performance. Further-more, microgliosis (P < .05), astrogliosis (P < .01), and myelin thinning (P <.05) were observed in both radiation modalities, with X-CRT showing slightly more inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Both P-CRT and X-CRT lead to neurocognitive changes compared with sham. Although no significant difference was observed in neuroinflammation between the irradiated groups, differences were found in late-term glucose metabolism and brain connectome. Our results indicate that despite relative biological effectiveness weighting of the proton dose there are still differential effects which warrants further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8748279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87482792022-02-01 Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model Tang, Tien T. Zawaski, Janice A. Kesler, Shelli Beamish, Christine A. Inoue, Taeko Perez, Emma C. Bronk, Lawrence Poenisch, Falk Briere, Tina M. Sabek, Omaima M. Grosshans, David R. Gaber, M. Waleed Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Article PURPOSE: Compared with photon cranial radiation therapy (X-CRT), proton cranial radiation therapy (P-CRT) offers potential advantages in limiting radiation-induced sequalae in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. This study aims to identify cognitive, functional magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography imaging markers and molecular differences between the radiation modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Juvenile rats received a single faction of 10 Gy (relative biological effectiveness−weighted dose) delivered with 6 MV X-CRT or at the midspread out Bragg peak of a 100 MeV P-CRT beam. At 3, 6, and 12 months post-CRT, executive function was measured using 5-choice serial reaction time task. At ~12 months post-CRT, animals were imaged with (18)F-Flurodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography imaging followed by functional ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging and stained for markers of neuroinflammation. RESULTS: Irradiated animals had cognitive impairment with a higher number of omissions and lower incorrect and premature responses compared with sham (P ≤ .05). The accuracy of the animals’ X-CRT was less than that of sham (P ≤ .001). No significant difference in rates of cognitive change were found between the radiation modalities. At 12 months post-CRT, glucose metabolism was significantly higher than sham in X-CRT (P = .04) but not P-CRT. Using diffusion tensor imaging, P-CRT brains were found to have higher white matter volume and fiber lengths compared with sham (P < .03). Only X-CRT animals had higher apparent diffusion coefficient values compared with sham (P = .04). P-CRT animals had more connectomic changes compared with X-CRT. Correlative analysis identified several imaging features with cognitive performance. Further-more, microgliosis (P < .05), astrogliosis (P < .01), and myelin thinning (P <.05) were observed in both radiation modalities, with X-CRT showing slightly more inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Both P-CRT and X-CRT lead to neurocognitive changes compared with sham. Although no significant difference was observed in neuroinflammation between the irradiated groups, differences were found in late-term glucose metabolism and brain connectome. Our results indicate that despite relative biological effectiveness weighting of the proton dose there are still differential effects which warrants further investigation. 2022-02-01 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8748279/ /pubmed/34509550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.005 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Article Tang, Tien T. Zawaski, Janice A. Kesler, Shelli Beamish, Christine A. Inoue, Taeko Perez, Emma C. Bronk, Lawrence Poenisch, Falk Briere, Tina M. Sabek, Omaima M. Grosshans, David R. Gaber, M. Waleed Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model |
title | Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model |
title_full | Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model |
title_fullStr | Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model |
title_short | Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model |
title_sort | cognitive and imaging differences after proton and photon whole brain irradiation in a preclinical model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34509550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangtient cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel AT zawaskijanicea cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel AT keslershelli cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel AT beamishchristinea cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel AT inouetaeko cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel AT perezemmac cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel AT bronklawrence cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel AT poenischfalk cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel AT brieretinam cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel AT sabekomaimam cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel AT grosshansdavidr cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel AT gabermwaleed cognitiveandimagingdifferencesafterprotonandphotonwholebrainirradiationinapreclinicalmodel |