Cargando…
Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review
While the opportunities of ML and AI in healthcare are promising, the growth of complex data-driven prediction models requires careful quality and applicability assessment before they are applied and disseminated in daily practice. This scoping review aimed to identify actionable guidance for those...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35013569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00549-7 |
_version_ | 1784631105679261696 |
---|---|
author | de Hond, Anne A. H. Leeuwenberg, Artuur M. Hooft, Lotty Kant, Ilse M. J. Nijman, Steven W. J. van Os, Hendrikus J. A. Aardoom, Jiska J. Debray, Thomas P. A. Schuit, Ewoud van Smeden, Maarten Reitsma, Johannes B. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Chavannes, Niels H. Moons, Karel G. M. |
author_facet | de Hond, Anne A. H. Leeuwenberg, Artuur M. Hooft, Lotty Kant, Ilse M. J. Nijman, Steven W. J. van Os, Hendrikus J. A. Aardoom, Jiska J. Debray, Thomas P. A. Schuit, Ewoud van Smeden, Maarten Reitsma, Johannes B. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Chavannes, Niels H. Moons, Karel G. M. |
author_sort | de Hond, Anne A. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | While the opportunities of ML and AI in healthcare are promising, the growth of complex data-driven prediction models requires careful quality and applicability assessment before they are applied and disseminated in daily practice. This scoping review aimed to identify actionable guidance for those closely involved in AI-based prediction model (AIPM) development, evaluation and implementation including software engineers, data scientists, and healthcare professionals and to identify potential gaps in this guidance. We performed a scoping review of the relevant literature providing guidance or quality criteria regarding the development, evaluation, and implementation of AIPMs using a comprehensive multi-stage screening strategy. PubMed, Web of Science, and the ACM Digital Library were searched, and AI experts were consulted. Topics were extracted from the identified literature and summarized across the six phases at the core of this review: (1) data preparation, (2) AIPM development, (3) AIPM validation, (4) software development, (5) AIPM impact assessment, and (6) AIPM implementation into daily healthcare practice. From 2683 unique hits, 72 relevant guidance documents were identified. Substantial guidance was found for data preparation, AIPM development and AIPM validation (phases 1–3), while later phases clearly have received less attention (software development, impact assessment and implementation) in the scientific literature. The six phases of the AIPM development, evaluation and implementation cycle provide a framework for responsible introduction of AI-based prediction models in healthcare. Additional domain and technology specific research may be necessary and more practical experience with implementing AIPMs is needed to support further guidance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8748878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87488782022-01-20 Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review de Hond, Anne A. H. Leeuwenberg, Artuur M. Hooft, Lotty Kant, Ilse M. J. Nijman, Steven W. J. van Os, Hendrikus J. A. Aardoom, Jiska J. Debray, Thomas P. A. Schuit, Ewoud van Smeden, Maarten Reitsma, Johannes B. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Chavannes, Niels H. Moons, Karel G. M. NPJ Digit Med Review Article While the opportunities of ML and AI in healthcare are promising, the growth of complex data-driven prediction models requires careful quality and applicability assessment before they are applied and disseminated in daily practice. This scoping review aimed to identify actionable guidance for those closely involved in AI-based prediction model (AIPM) development, evaluation and implementation including software engineers, data scientists, and healthcare professionals and to identify potential gaps in this guidance. We performed a scoping review of the relevant literature providing guidance or quality criteria regarding the development, evaluation, and implementation of AIPMs using a comprehensive multi-stage screening strategy. PubMed, Web of Science, and the ACM Digital Library were searched, and AI experts were consulted. Topics were extracted from the identified literature and summarized across the six phases at the core of this review: (1) data preparation, (2) AIPM development, (3) AIPM validation, (4) software development, (5) AIPM impact assessment, and (6) AIPM implementation into daily healthcare practice. From 2683 unique hits, 72 relevant guidance documents were identified. Substantial guidance was found for data preparation, AIPM development and AIPM validation (phases 1–3), while later phases clearly have received less attention (software development, impact assessment and implementation) in the scientific literature. The six phases of the AIPM development, evaluation and implementation cycle provide a framework for responsible introduction of AI-based prediction models in healthcare. Additional domain and technology specific research may be necessary and more practical experience with implementing AIPMs is needed to support further guidance. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8748878/ /pubmed/35013569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00549-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article de Hond, Anne A. H. Leeuwenberg, Artuur M. Hooft, Lotty Kant, Ilse M. J. Nijman, Steven W. J. van Os, Hendrikus J. A. Aardoom, Jiska J. Debray, Thomas P. A. Schuit, Ewoud van Smeden, Maarten Reitsma, Johannes B. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Chavannes, Niels H. Moons, Karel G. M. Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review |
title | Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review |
title_full | Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review |
title_short | Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review |
title_sort | guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35013569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00549-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dehondanneah guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT leeuwenbergartuurm guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT hooftlotty guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT kantilsemj guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT nijmanstevenwj guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT vanoshendrikusja guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT aardoomjiskaj guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT debraythomaspa guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT schuitewoud guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT vansmedenmaarten guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT reitsmajohannesb guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT steyerbergewoutw guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT chavannesnielsh guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview AT moonskarelgm guidelinesandqualitycriteriaforartificialintelligencebasedpredictionmodelsinhealthcareascopingreview |