Cargando…
Therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles in preclinical stroke models: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: Currently there is a paucity of clinically available regenerative therapies for stroke. Extracellular vesicles (EV) have been investigated for their potential as modulators of regeneration in the poststroke brain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide a summary of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35047689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2019-100047 |
_version_ | 1784631190708289536 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Josephine M Cunningham, Catriona J Lawrence, Catherine B Pinteaux, Emmanuel Allan, Stuart M |
author_facet | Thomas, Josephine M Cunningham, Catriona J Lawrence, Catherine B Pinteaux, Emmanuel Allan, Stuart M |
author_sort | Thomas, Josephine M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Currently there is a paucity of clinically available regenerative therapies for stroke. Extracellular vesicles (EV) have been investigated for their potential as modulators of regeneration in the poststroke brain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide a summary of the efficacy of therapeutic EVs in preclinical stroke models, to inform future research in this emerging field. METHODS: Studies were identified by a comprehensive literature search of two online sources and subsequent screening. Studies using lesion volume or neurological score as outcome measures were included. Standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs were calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood random effects model. Publication bias was assessed with Egger’s regression and presented as funnel plots with trim and fill analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the effects of different study variables. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the CAMARADES checklist. RESULTS: A total of 20 publications were included in the systematic review, of which 19 were assessed in the meta-analysis (43 comparisons). Overall, EV interventions improved lesion volume (SMD: −1.95, 95% CI −2.72 to 1.18) and neurological scores (SMD: −1.26, 95% CI −1.64 to 0.87) compared with control groups. Funnel plots were asymmetrical suggesting publication bias, and trim and fill analysis predicted seven missing studies for lesion volume. Subgroup analysis suggested administration at 0–23 hours after stroke was the most effective timepoint for EV treatment. The median score on the CAMARADES checklist was 7 (IQR: 5–8). CONCLUSIONS: EVs may offer a promising new avenue for stroke therapies, as EV-based interventions had positive impacts on lesion volume and neurological score in preclinical stroke models. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019134925. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8749279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87492792022-01-18 Therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles in preclinical stroke models: a systematic review and meta-analysis Thomas, Josephine M Cunningham, Catriona J Lawrence, Catherine B Pinteaux, Emmanuel Allan, Stuart M BMJ Open Sci Original Research OBJECTIVES: Currently there is a paucity of clinically available regenerative therapies for stroke. Extracellular vesicles (EV) have been investigated for their potential as modulators of regeneration in the poststroke brain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide a summary of the efficacy of therapeutic EVs in preclinical stroke models, to inform future research in this emerging field. METHODS: Studies were identified by a comprehensive literature search of two online sources and subsequent screening. Studies using lesion volume or neurological score as outcome measures were included. Standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs were calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood random effects model. Publication bias was assessed with Egger’s regression and presented as funnel plots with trim and fill analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the effects of different study variables. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the CAMARADES checklist. RESULTS: A total of 20 publications were included in the systematic review, of which 19 were assessed in the meta-analysis (43 comparisons). Overall, EV interventions improved lesion volume (SMD: −1.95, 95% CI −2.72 to 1.18) and neurological scores (SMD: −1.26, 95% CI −1.64 to 0.87) compared with control groups. Funnel plots were asymmetrical suggesting publication bias, and trim and fill analysis predicted seven missing studies for lesion volume. Subgroup analysis suggested administration at 0–23 hours after stroke was the most effective timepoint for EV treatment. The median score on the CAMARADES checklist was 7 (IQR: 5–8). CONCLUSIONS: EVs may offer a promising new avenue for stroke therapies, as EV-based interventions had positive impacts on lesion volume and neurological score in preclinical stroke models. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019134925. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8749279/ /pubmed/35047689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2019-100047 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Thomas, Josephine M Cunningham, Catriona J Lawrence, Catherine B Pinteaux, Emmanuel Allan, Stuart M Therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles in preclinical stroke models: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles in preclinical stroke models: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles in preclinical stroke models: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles in preclinical stroke models: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles in preclinical stroke models: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles in preclinical stroke models: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicles in preclinical stroke models: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35047689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2019-100047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasjosephinem therapeuticpotentialofextracellularvesiclesinpreclinicalstrokemodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cunninghamcatrionaj therapeuticpotentialofextracellularvesiclesinpreclinicalstrokemodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lawrencecatherineb therapeuticpotentialofextracellularvesiclesinpreclinicalstrokemodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pinteauxemmanuel therapeuticpotentialofextracellularvesiclesinpreclinicalstrokemodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT allanstuartm therapeuticpotentialofextracellularvesiclesinpreclinicalstrokemodelsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |