Cargando…

Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore which enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) bundle items were most associated with decreased length of stay after surgery, most likely associated with decreased length of stay after surgery. DESIGN: A cohort study. SETTING: Large tertiary academic me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sisodia, Rachel C., Ellis, Dan, Hidrue, Michael, Linov, Pamela, Cavallo, Elena, Bryant, Allison S., Wakamatsu, May, del Carmen, Marcela G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35047804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000087
_version_ 1784631203030106112
author Sisodia, Rachel C.
Ellis, Dan
Hidrue, Michael
Linov, Pamela
Cavallo, Elena
Bryant, Allison S.
Wakamatsu, May
del Carmen, Marcela G.
author_facet Sisodia, Rachel C.
Ellis, Dan
Hidrue, Michael
Linov, Pamela
Cavallo, Elena
Bryant, Allison S.
Wakamatsu, May
del Carmen, Marcela G.
author_sort Sisodia, Rachel C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore which enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) bundle items were most associated with decreased length of stay after surgery, most likely associated with decreased length of stay after surgery. DESIGN: A cohort study. SETTING: Large tertiary academic medical centre. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 1318 women undergoing hysterectomy as part of our ERAS pathway between 1 February 2018 and 30 January 2020 and a matched historical cohort of all hysterectomies performed at our institution between 3 October 2016 and 30 January 2018 (n=1063). INTERVENTION: The addition of ERAS to perioperative care. This is a cohort study of all patients undergoing hysterectomy at an academic medical centre after ERAS implementation on 1 February 2018. Compliance and outcomes after ERAS roll out were monitored and managed by a centralised team. Descriptive statistics, multivariate regression, interrupted time series analysis were used as indicated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Impact of ERAS process measure adherence on length of stay. RESULTS: After initiation of ERAS pathway, 1318 women underwent hysterectomy. There were more open surgeries after ERAS implementation, but cohorts were otherwise balanced. The impact of process measure adherence on length of stay varied based on surgical approach (minimally invasive vs open). For open surgery, compliance with intraoperative antiemetics (−30%, 95% CI −18% to 40%) and decreased postoperative fluid administration (−12%, 95% CI −1% to 21%) were significantly associated with reduced length of stay. For minimally invasive surgery, ambulation within 8 hours of surgery was associated with reduced length of stay (−53%, 95% CI −55% to 52%). CONCLUSIONS: While adherence to overall ERAS protocols decreases length of stay, the specific components of the bundle most significantly impacting this outcome remain elusive. Our data identify early ambulation, use of antiemetics and decreasing postoperative fluid administration to be associated with decreased length of stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8749327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87493272022-01-18 Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components Sisodia, Rachel C. Ellis, Dan Hidrue, Michael Linov, Pamela Cavallo, Elena Bryant, Allison S. Wakamatsu, May del Carmen, Marcela G. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol Original Research OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore which enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) bundle items were most associated with decreased length of stay after surgery, most likely associated with decreased length of stay after surgery. DESIGN: A cohort study. SETTING: Large tertiary academic medical centre. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 1318 women undergoing hysterectomy as part of our ERAS pathway between 1 February 2018 and 30 January 2020 and a matched historical cohort of all hysterectomies performed at our institution between 3 October 2016 and 30 January 2018 (n=1063). INTERVENTION: The addition of ERAS to perioperative care. This is a cohort study of all patients undergoing hysterectomy at an academic medical centre after ERAS implementation on 1 February 2018. Compliance and outcomes after ERAS roll out were monitored and managed by a centralised team. Descriptive statistics, multivariate regression, interrupted time series analysis were used as indicated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Impact of ERAS process measure adherence on length of stay. RESULTS: After initiation of ERAS pathway, 1318 women underwent hysterectomy. There were more open surgeries after ERAS implementation, but cohorts were otherwise balanced. The impact of process measure adherence on length of stay varied based on surgical approach (minimally invasive vs open). For open surgery, compliance with intraoperative antiemetics (−30%, 95% CI −18% to 40%) and decreased postoperative fluid administration (−12%, 95% CI −1% to 21%) were significantly associated with reduced length of stay. For minimally invasive surgery, ambulation within 8 hours of surgery was associated with reduced length of stay (−53%, 95% CI −55% to 52%). CONCLUSIONS: While adherence to overall ERAS protocols decreases length of stay, the specific components of the bundle most significantly impacting this outcome remain elusive. Our data identify early ambulation, use of antiemetics and decreasing postoperative fluid administration to be associated with decreased length of stay. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8749327/ /pubmed/35047804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000087 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Sisodia, Rachel C.
Ellis, Dan
Hidrue, Michael
Linov, Pamela
Cavallo, Elena
Bryant, Allison S.
Wakamatsu, May
del Carmen, Marcela G.
Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components
title Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components
title_full Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components
title_fullStr Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components
title_full_unstemmed Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components
title_short Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components
title_sort cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35047804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000087
work_keys_str_mv AT sisodiarachelc cohortstudyofimpactonlengthofstayofindividualenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolcomponents
AT ellisdan cohortstudyofimpactonlengthofstayofindividualenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolcomponents
AT hidruemichael cohortstudyofimpactonlengthofstayofindividualenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolcomponents
AT linovpamela cohortstudyofimpactonlengthofstayofindividualenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolcomponents
AT cavalloelena cohortstudyofimpactonlengthofstayofindividualenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolcomponents
AT bryantallisons cohortstudyofimpactonlengthofstayofindividualenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolcomponents
AT wakamatsumay cohortstudyofimpactonlengthofstayofindividualenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolcomponents
AT delcarmenmarcelag cohortstudyofimpactonlengthofstayofindividualenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolcomponents