Cargando…

Radial sphincterotomy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to extrahepatic obstructions by large stones in the common bile duct

OBJECTIVES: The most common method of removal of calculi (“stones”) from the common bile duct (CBD) is an endoscopic sphincterotomy. We wished to determine the role of an improved method of sphincterotomy in choledocholithiasis: “radial sphincterotomy”. METHODS: From 2017 to 2018, 54 endoscopic retr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Yusif-zade, Kenan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Fujita Medical Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35111545
http://dx.doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2020-004
_version_ 1784631252256555008
author Yusif-zade, Kenan
author_facet Yusif-zade, Kenan
author_sort Yusif-zade, Kenan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The most common method of removal of calculi (“stones”) from the common bile duct (CBD) is an endoscopic sphincterotomy. We wished to determine the role of an improved method of sphincterotomy in choledocholithiasis: “radial sphincterotomy”. METHODS: From 2017 to 2018, 54 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures were undertaken in patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis. Group 1 (23 patients) received a standard “pull type” sphincterotomy. The sphincterotomy incision in group 1 was made at the 11, 12 or 1 ‘O’ clock directions of a conventional clock depending on the anatomy of the papilla and stone size. Group 2 (31 patients) received a radial sphincterotomy. In this case, several incisions were made in the 11, 12 or 1 ‘O’ clock directions. The main incision was applied to the transverse fold, and other radial incisions were made below the transverse fold, without going beyond the boundaries of the proposed course of the intramural part of the CBD. RESULTS: Stone size (mm) was classified as ≤5, 5–10, 10–15, 15–20 and >20. In group 1, the stone size was <20 mm in 21 patients, and >20 mm in two patients. In group 2, stones >20 mm were detected in seven patients, and in other cases the size was 15–20 mm. In patients who underwent radial sphincterotomy, post-ERCP pancreatitis was noted in one patient, and bleeding and perforations were not observed . CONCLUSIONS: Our method showed promising results, and deserves more extensive research and worldwide application. We recommend that only experienced endoscopists should undertake this novel procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8749533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Fujita Medical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87495332022-02-01 Radial sphincterotomy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to extrahepatic obstructions by large stones in the common bile duct Yusif-zade, Kenan Fujita Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: The most common method of removal of calculi (“stones”) from the common bile duct (CBD) is an endoscopic sphincterotomy. We wished to determine the role of an improved method of sphincterotomy in choledocholithiasis: “radial sphincterotomy”. METHODS: From 2017 to 2018, 54 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures were undertaken in patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis. Group 1 (23 patients) received a standard “pull type” sphincterotomy. The sphincterotomy incision in group 1 was made at the 11, 12 or 1 ‘O’ clock directions of a conventional clock depending on the anatomy of the papilla and stone size. Group 2 (31 patients) received a radial sphincterotomy. In this case, several incisions were made in the 11, 12 or 1 ‘O’ clock directions. The main incision was applied to the transverse fold, and other radial incisions were made below the transverse fold, without going beyond the boundaries of the proposed course of the intramural part of the CBD. RESULTS: Stone size (mm) was classified as ≤5, 5–10, 10–15, 15–20 and >20. In group 1, the stone size was <20 mm in 21 patients, and >20 mm in two patients. In group 2, stones >20 mm were detected in seven patients, and in other cases the size was 15–20 mm. In patients who underwent radial sphincterotomy, post-ERCP pancreatitis was noted in one patient, and bleeding and perforations were not observed . CONCLUSIONS: Our method showed promising results, and deserves more extensive research and worldwide application. We recommend that only experienced endoscopists should undertake this novel procedure. Fujita Medical Society 2021 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8749533/ /pubmed/35111545 http://dx.doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2020-004 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open access article distributed under the Terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yusif-zade, Kenan
Radial sphincterotomy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to extrahepatic obstructions by large stones in the common bile duct
title Radial sphincterotomy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to extrahepatic obstructions by large stones in the common bile duct
title_full Radial sphincterotomy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to extrahepatic obstructions by large stones in the common bile duct
title_fullStr Radial sphincterotomy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to extrahepatic obstructions by large stones in the common bile duct
title_full_unstemmed Radial sphincterotomy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to extrahepatic obstructions by large stones in the common bile duct
title_short Radial sphincterotomy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to extrahepatic obstructions by large stones in the common bile duct
title_sort radial sphincterotomy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to extrahepatic obstructions by large stones in the common bile duct
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35111545
http://dx.doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2020-004
work_keys_str_mv AT yusifzadekenan radialsphincterotomyinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyduetoextrahepaticobstructionsbylargestonesinthecommonbileduct