Cargando…
Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study
Options for monitoring sports have been continuously developed by using activity trackers to determine almost all vital and movement parameters. The aim of this study was to validate heart rate and distance measurements of two activity trackers (Polar Ignite; Garmin Forerunner 945) and a cellphone a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22010180 |
_version_ | 1784631269783502848 |
---|---|
author | Budig, Mario Keiner, Michael Stoohs, Riccardo Hoffmeister, Meike Höltke, Volker |
author_facet | Budig, Mario Keiner, Michael Stoohs, Riccardo Hoffmeister, Meike Höltke, Volker |
author_sort | Budig, Mario |
collection | PubMed |
description | Options for monitoring sports have been continuously developed by using activity trackers to determine almost all vital and movement parameters. The aim of this study was to validate heart rate and distance measurements of two activity trackers (Polar Ignite; Garmin Forerunner 945) and a cellphone app (Polar Beat app using iPhone 7 as a hardware platform) in a cross-sectional field study. Thirty-six moderate endurance-trained adults (20 males/16 females) completed a test battery consisting of walking and running 3 km, a 1.6 km interval run (standard 400 m outdoor stadium), 3 km forest run (outdoor), 500/1000 m swim and 4.3/31.5 km cycling tests. Heart rate was recorded via a Polar H10 chest strap and distance was controlled via a map, 400 m stadium or 50 m pool. For all tests except swimming, strong correlation values of r > 0.90 were calculated with moderate exercise intensity and a mean absolute percentage error of 2.85%. During the interval run, several significant deviations (p < 0.049) were observed. The swim disciplines showed significant differences (p < 0.001), with the 500 m test having a mean absolute percentage error of 8.61%, and the 1000 m test of 55.32%. In most tests, significant deviations (p < 0.001) were calculated for distance measurement. However, a maximum mean absolute percentage error of 4.74% and small mean absolute error based on the total route lengths were calculated. This study showed that the accuracy of heart rate measurements could be rated as good, except for rapid changing heart rate during interval training and swimming. Distance measurement differences were rated as non-relevant in practice for use in sports. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8749603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87496032022-01-12 Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study Budig, Mario Keiner, Michael Stoohs, Riccardo Hoffmeister, Meike Höltke, Volker Sensors (Basel) Article Options for monitoring sports have been continuously developed by using activity trackers to determine almost all vital and movement parameters. The aim of this study was to validate heart rate and distance measurements of two activity trackers (Polar Ignite; Garmin Forerunner 945) and a cellphone app (Polar Beat app using iPhone 7 as a hardware platform) in a cross-sectional field study. Thirty-six moderate endurance-trained adults (20 males/16 females) completed a test battery consisting of walking and running 3 km, a 1.6 km interval run (standard 400 m outdoor stadium), 3 km forest run (outdoor), 500/1000 m swim and 4.3/31.5 km cycling tests. Heart rate was recorded via a Polar H10 chest strap and distance was controlled via a map, 400 m stadium or 50 m pool. For all tests except swimming, strong correlation values of r > 0.90 were calculated with moderate exercise intensity and a mean absolute percentage error of 2.85%. During the interval run, several significant deviations (p < 0.049) were observed. The swim disciplines showed significant differences (p < 0.001), with the 500 m test having a mean absolute percentage error of 8.61%, and the 1000 m test of 55.32%. In most tests, significant deviations (p < 0.001) were calculated for distance measurement. However, a maximum mean absolute percentage error of 4.74% and small mean absolute error based on the total route lengths were calculated. This study showed that the accuracy of heart rate measurements could be rated as good, except for rapid changing heart rate during interval training and swimming. Distance measurement differences were rated as non-relevant in practice for use in sports. MDPI 2021-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8749603/ /pubmed/35009723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22010180 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Budig, Mario Keiner, Michael Stoohs, Riccardo Hoffmeister, Meike Höltke, Volker Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study |
title | Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study |
title_full | Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study |
title_fullStr | Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study |
title_short | Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study |
title_sort | heart rate and distance measurement of two multisport activity trackers and a cellphone app in different sports: a cross-sectional validation and comparison field study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22010180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT budigmario heartrateanddistancemeasurementoftwomultisportactivitytrackersandacellphoneappindifferentsportsacrosssectionalvalidationandcomparisonfieldstudy AT keinermichael heartrateanddistancemeasurementoftwomultisportactivitytrackersandacellphoneappindifferentsportsacrosssectionalvalidationandcomparisonfieldstudy AT stoohsriccardo heartrateanddistancemeasurementoftwomultisportactivitytrackersandacellphoneappindifferentsportsacrosssectionalvalidationandcomparisonfieldstudy AT hoffmeistermeike heartrateanddistancemeasurementoftwomultisportactivitytrackersandacellphoneappindifferentsportsacrosssectionalvalidationandcomparisonfieldstudy AT holtkevolker heartrateanddistancemeasurementoftwomultisportactivitytrackersandacellphoneappindifferentsportsacrosssectionalvalidationandcomparisonfieldstudy |