Cargando…

Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study

Options for monitoring sports have been continuously developed by using activity trackers to determine almost all vital and movement parameters. The aim of this study was to validate heart rate and distance measurements of two activity trackers (Polar Ignite; Garmin Forerunner 945) and a cellphone a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Budig, Mario, Keiner, Michael, Stoohs, Riccardo, Hoffmeister, Meike, Höltke, Volker
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009723
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22010180
_version_ 1784631269783502848
author Budig, Mario
Keiner, Michael
Stoohs, Riccardo
Hoffmeister, Meike
Höltke, Volker
author_facet Budig, Mario
Keiner, Michael
Stoohs, Riccardo
Hoffmeister, Meike
Höltke, Volker
author_sort Budig, Mario
collection PubMed
description Options for monitoring sports have been continuously developed by using activity trackers to determine almost all vital and movement parameters. The aim of this study was to validate heart rate and distance measurements of two activity trackers (Polar Ignite; Garmin Forerunner 945) and a cellphone app (Polar Beat app using iPhone 7 as a hardware platform) in a cross-sectional field study. Thirty-six moderate endurance-trained adults (20 males/16 females) completed a test battery consisting of walking and running 3 km, a 1.6 km interval run (standard 400 m outdoor stadium), 3 km forest run (outdoor), 500/1000 m swim and 4.3/31.5 km cycling tests. Heart rate was recorded via a Polar H10 chest strap and distance was controlled via a map, 400 m stadium or 50 m pool. For all tests except swimming, strong correlation values of r > 0.90 were calculated with moderate exercise intensity and a mean absolute percentage error of 2.85%. During the interval run, several significant deviations (p < 0.049) were observed. The swim disciplines showed significant differences (p < 0.001), with the 500 m test having a mean absolute percentage error of 8.61%, and the 1000 m test of 55.32%. In most tests, significant deviations (p < 0.001) were calculated for distance measurement. However, a maximum mean absolute percentage error of 4.74% and small mean absolute error based on the total route lengths were calculated. This study showed that the accuracy of heart rate measurements could be rated as good, except for rapid changing heart rate during interval training and swimming. Distance measurement differences were rated as non-relevant in practice for use in sports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8749603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87496032022-01-12 Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study Budig, Mario Keiner, Michael Stoohs, Riccardo Hoffmeister, Meike Höltke, Volker Sensors (Basel) Article Options for monitoring sports have been continuously developed by using activity trackers to determine almost all vital and movement parameters. The aim of this study was to validate heart rate and distance measurements of two activity trackers (Polar Ignite; Garmin Forerunner 945) and a cellphone app (Polar Beat app using iPhone 7 as a hardware platform) in a cross-sectional field study. Thirty-six moderate endurance-trained adults (20 males/16 females) completed a test battery consisting of walking and running 3 km, a 1.6 km interval run (standard 400 m outdoor stadium), 3 km forest run (outdoor), 500/1000 m swim and 4.3/31.5 km cycling tests. Heart rate was recorded via a Polar H10 chest strap and distance was controlled via a map, 400 m stadium or 50 m pool. For all tests except swimming, strong correlation values of r > 0.90 were calculated with moderate exercise intensity and a mean absolute percentage error of 2.85%. During the interval run, several significant deviations (p < 0.049) were observed. The swim disciplines showed significant differences (p < 0.001), with the 500 m test having a mean absolute percentage error of 8.61%, and the 1000 m test of 55.32%. In most tests, significant deviations (p < 0.001) were calculated for distance measurement. However, a maximum mean absolute percentage error of 4.74% and small mean absolute error based on the total route lengths were calculated. This study showed that the accuracy of heart rate measurements could be rated as good, except for rapid changing heart rate during interval training and swimming. Distance measurement differences were rated as non-relevant in practice for use in sports. MDPI 2021-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8749603/ /pubmed/35009723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22010180 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Budig, Mario
Keiner, Michael
Stoohs, Riccardo
Hoffmeister, Meike
Höltke, Volker
Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study
title Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study
title_full Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study
title_fullStr Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study
title_full_unstemmed Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study
title_short Heart Rate and Distance Measurement of Two Multisport Activity Trackers and a Cellphone App in Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Validation and Comparison Field Study
title_sort heart rate and distance measurement of two multisport activity trackers and a cellphone app in different sports: a cross-sectional validation and comparison field study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35009723
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22010180
work_keys_str_mv AT budigmario heartrateanddistancemeasurementoftwomultisportactivitytrackersandacellphoneappindifferentsportsacrosssectionalvalidationandcomparisonfieldstudy
AT keinermichael heartrateanddistancemeasurementoftwomultisportactivitytrackersandacellphoneappindifferentsportsacrosssectionalvalidationandcomparisonfieldstudy
AT stoohsriccardo heartrateanddistancemeasurementoftwomultisportactivitytrackersandacellphoneappindifferentsportsacrosssectionalvalidationandcomparisonfieldstudy
AT hoffmeistermeike heartrateanddistancemeasurementoftwomultisportactivitytrackersandacellphoneappindifferentsportsacrosssectionalvalidationandcomparisonfieldstudy
AT holtkevolker heartrateanddistancemeasurementoftwomultisportactivitytrackersandacellphoneappindifferentsportsacrosssectionalvalidationandcomparisonfieldstudy