Cargando…

Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Cervical Microbes of Gilts and Sows

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Antimicrobial resistance is occurring at an alarming rate around the world; as a result, some bacterial infections are no longer treatable with antibiotics. “Prudent use” involves only using antibiotics for therapeutic purposes. One non-therapeutic use is in semen extenders used to p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kellerman, Cecilia, Malaluang, Pongpreecha, Hansson, Ingrid, Eliasson Selling, Lena, Morrell, Jane M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35011222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12010117
_version_ 1784631283618414592
author Kellerman, Cecilia
Malaluang, Pongpreecha
Hansson, Ingrid
Eliasson Selling, Lena
Morrell, Jane M.
author_facet Kellerman, Cecilia
Malaluang, Pongpreecha
Hansson, Ingrid
Eliasson Selling, Lena
Morrell, Jane M.
author_sort Kellerman, Cecilia
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Antimicrobial resistance is occurring at an alarming rate around the world; as a result, some bacterial infections are no longer treatable with antibiotics. “Prudent use” involves only using antibiotics for therapeutic purposes. One non-therapeutic use is in semen extenders used to prepare insemination doses, which is required by law for international trade. The pig breeding industry uses large volumes of semen extenders every year. In this study, we investigate whether the antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacteria in the cervix of pigs are different in non-inseminated females compared to those that have had several litters of piglets following artificial insemination. We found that the resistance patterns in bacteria from these two groups of pigs were different, with more resistance in the pigs that had already had several litters. Some bacteria showed antibiotic resistance, and even multidrug resistance, despite no record of these antibiotics being used on the farm. These findings suggest that alternatives to antibiotics in semen extenders are required. ABSTRACT: Extenders for boar semen contain antibiotics, which may induce antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in inseminated females. The objective was to investigate AMR of bacteria isolated from the cervix of sows and gilts in standing heat, representing females previously exposed to antibiotics in the semen extender and non-exposed females, respectively. Cervical swabs were taken from 30 multiparous sows and 30 gilts prior to their first insemination. After culturing on agar plates, bacterial isolates were identified by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry and antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined. Differences in antibiotic resistance between sows and gilts were analyzed by Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. Bacteria isolated were mostly Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp. and Corynebacterium spp. Higher MICs were observed for isolates from sows than from gilts. Most (>80%) Corynebacterium spp. were resistant to clindamycin; small numbers (<20%) were resistant to gentamicin, penicillin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin and rifampicin, with no differences between gilts and sows. Corynebacterium from gilts were more often resistant to tetracycline than those from sows (25% vs. 4.17%; p = 0.04). In conclusion, bacteria from the porcine cervix showed low resistance to most antibiotics except for clindamycin, but antibacterial resistance may increase with increasing parity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8749660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87496602022-01-12 Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Cervical Microbes of Gilts and Sows Kellerman, Cecilia Malaluang, Pongpreecha Hansson, Ingrid Eliasson Selling, Lena Morrell, Jane M. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Antimicrobial resistance is occurring at an alarming rate around the world; as a result, some bacterial infections are no longer treatable with antibiotics. “Prudent use” involves only using antibiotics for therapeutic purposes. One non-therapeutic use is in semen extenders used to prepare insemination doses, which is required by law for international trade. The pig breeding industry uses large volumes of semen extenders every year. In this study, we investigate whether the antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacteria in the cervix of pigs are different in non-inseminated females compared to those that have had several litters of piglets following artificial insemination. We found that the resistance patterns in bacteria from these two groups of pigs were different, with more resistance in the pigs that had already had several litters. Some bacteria showed antibiotic resistance, and even multidrug resistance, despite no record of these antibiotics being used on the farm. These findings suggest that alternatives to antibiotics in semen extenders are required. ABSTRACT: Extenders for boar semen contain antibiotics, which may induce antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in inseminated females. The objective was to investigate AMR of bacteria isolated from the cervix of sows and gilts in standing heat, representing females previously exposed to antibiotics in the semen extender and non-exposed females, respectively. Cervical swabs were taken from 30 multiparous sows and 30 gilts prior to their first insemination. After culturing on agar plates, bacterial isolates were identified by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry and antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined. Differences in antibiotic resistance between sows and gilts were analyzed by Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. Bacteria isolated were mostly Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp. and Corynebacterium spp. Higher MICs were observed for isolates from sows than from gilts. Most (>80%) Corynebacterium spp. were resistant to clindamycin; small numbers (<20%) were resistant to gentamicin, penicillin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin and rifampicin, with no differences between gilts and sows. Corynebacterium from gilts were more often resistant to tetracycline than those from sows (25% vs. 4.17%; p = 0.04). In conclusion, bacteria from the porcine cervix showed low resistance to most antibiotics except for clindamycin, but antibacterial resistance may increase with increasing parity. MDPI 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8749660/ /pubmed/35011222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12010117 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kellerman, Cecilia
Malaluang, Pongpreecha
Hansson, Ingrid
Eliasson Selling, Lena
Morrell, Jane M.
Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Cervical Microbes of Gilts and Sows
title Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Cervical Microbes of Gilts and Sows
title_full Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Cervical Microbes of Gilts and Sows
title_fullStr Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Cervical Microbes of Gilts and Sows
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Cervical Microbes of Gilts and Sows
title_short Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Cervical Microbes of Gilts and Sows
title_sort antibiotic resistance patterns in cervical microbes of gilts and sows
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35011222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12010117
work_keys_str_mv AT kellermancecilia antibioticresistancepatternsincervicalmicrobesofgiltsandsows
AT malaluangpongpreecha antibioticresistancepatternsincervicalmicrobesofgiltsandsows
AT hanssoningrid antibioticresistancepatternsincervicalmicrobesofgiltsandsows
AT eliassonsellinglena antibioticresistancepatternsincervicalmicrobesofgiltsandsows
AT morrelljanem antibioticresistancepatternsincervicalmicrobesofgiltsandsows