Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 and the role of orofecal transmission: a systematic review

Background: Modes of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 are of key public health importance. SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the feces of some COVID-19 patients, suggesting the possibility that the virus could, in addition to droplet and fomite transmission, be transmitted via the orofecal route. Methods: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heneghan, Carl J., Spencer, Elizabeth A., Brassey, Jon, Plüddemann, Annette, Onakpoya, Igho J., Evans, David H., Conly, John M., Jefferson, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035883
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51592.2
_version_ 1784631338717937664
author Heneghan, Carl J.
Spencer, Elizabeth A.
Brassey, Jon
Plüddemann, Annette
Onakpoya, Igho J.
Evans, David H.
Conly, John M.
Jefferson, Tom
author_facet Heneghan, Carl J.
Spencer, Elizabeth A.
Brassey, Jon
Plüddemann, Annette
Onakpoya, Igho J.
Evans, David H.
Conly, John M.
Jefferson, Tom
author_sort Heneghan, Carl J.
collection PubMed
description Background: Modes of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 are of key public health importance. SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the feces of some COVID-19 patients, suggesting the possibility that the virus could, in addition to droplet and fomite transmission, be transmitted via the orofecal route. Methods: This review is part of an Open Evidence Review on Transmission Dynamics of COVID-19. We conduct ongoing searches using WHO COVID-19 Database, LitCovid, medRxiv, and Google Scholar; assess study quality based on five criteria and report important findings. Where necessary, authors are contacted for further details on the content of their articles. Results: We include searches up until 20 December 2020. We included 110 relevant studies: 76 primary observational studies or reports, and 35 reviews (one cohort study also included a review) examining the potential role of orofecal transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Of the observational studies, 37 were done in China. A total of 48 studies (n=9,081 patients) reported single cases, case series or cohort data on individuals with COVID-19 diagnosis or their contacts and 46 (96%) detected binary RT-PCR with 535 out of 1358 samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 (average 39.4%). The results suggest a long duration of fecal shedding, often recorded after respiratory samples tested negative, and symptoms of gastrointestinal disease were reported in several studies. Twenty-nine studies reported finding SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater, river water or toilet areas. Six studies attempted viral culture from COVID-19 patients’ fecal samples: culture was successful in 3 of 6 studies, and one study demonstrated invasion of the virus into intestinal epithelial cells. Conclusions: Varied observational and mechanistic evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 can infect and be shed from the gastrointestinal tract, including some data demonstrating viral culture in fecal samples. To fully assess these risks, quantitative data on infectious virus in these settings and infectious dose are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8749895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87498952022-01-14 SARS-CoV-2 and the role of orofecal transmission: a systematic review Heneghan, Carl J. Spencer, Elizabeth A. Brassey, Jon Plüddemann, Annette Onakpoya, Igho J. Evans, David H. Conly, John M. Jefferson, Tom F1000Res Systematic Review Background: Modes of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 are of key public health importance. SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the feces of some COVID-19 patients, suggesting the possibility that the virus could, in addition to droplet and fomite transmission, be transmitted via the orofecal route. Methods: This review is part of an Open Evidence Review on Transmission Dynamics of COVID-19. We conduct ongoing searches using WHO COVID-19 Database, LitCovid, medRxiv, and Google Scholar; assess study quality based on five criteria and report important findings. Where necessary, authors are contacted for further details on the content of their articles. Results: We include searches up until 20 December 2020. We included 110 relevant studies: 76 primary observational studies or reports, and 35 reviews (one cohort study also included a review) examining the potential role of orofecal transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Of the observational studies, 37 were done in China. A total of 48 studies (n=9,081 patients) reported single cases, case series or cohort data on individuals with COVID-19 diagnosis or their contacts and 46 (96%) detected binary RT-PCR with 535 out of 1358 samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 (average 39.4%). The results suggest a long duration of fecal shedding, often recorded after respiratory samples tested negative, and symptoms of gastrointestinal disease were reported in several studies. Twenty-nine studies reported finding SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater, river water or toilet areas. Six studies attempted viral culture from COVID-19 patients’ fecal samples: culture was successful in 3 of 6 studies, and one study demonstrated invasion of the virus into intestinal epithelial cells. Conclusions: Varied observational and mechanistic evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 can infect and be shed from the gastrointestinal tract, including some data demonstrating viral culture in fecal samples. To fully assess these risks, quantitative data on infectious virus in these settings and infectious dose are needed. F1000 Research Limited 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8749895/ /pubmed/35035883 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51592.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Heneghan CJ et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Heneghan, Carl J.
Spencer, Elizabeth A.
Brassey, Jon
Plüddemann, Annette
Onakpoya, Igho J.
Evans, David H.
Conly, John M.
Jefferson, Tom
SARS-CoV-2 and the role of orofecal transmission: a systematic review
title SARS-CoV-2 and the role of orofecal transmission: a systematic review
title_full SARS-CoV-2 and the role of orofecal transmission: a systematic review
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 and the role of orofecal transmission: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 and the role of orofecal transmission: a systematic review
title_short SARS-CoV-2 and the role of orofecal transmission: a systematic review
title_sort sars-cov-2 and the role of orofecal transmission: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035883
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51592.2
work_keys_str_mv AT heneghancarlj sarscov2andtheroleoforofecaltransmissionasystematicreview
AT spencerelizabetha sarscov2andtheroleoforofecaltransmissionasystematicreview
AT brasseyjon sarscov2andtheroleoforofecaltransmissionasystematicreview
AT pluddemannannette sarscov2andtheroleoforofecaltransmissionasystematicreview
AT onakpoyaighoj sarscov2andtheroleoforofecaltransmissionasystematicreview
AT evansdavidh sarscov2andtheroleoforofecaltransmissionasystematicreview
AT conlyjohnm sarscov2andtheroleoforofecaltransmissionasystematicreview
AT jeffersontom sarscov2andtheroleoforofecaltransmissionasystematicreview