Cargando…

COVID-19 und Endoskopieeinheiten: Erfahrungen und Empfehlungen nach 2 Jahren Pandemie

In 2020, the coronavirus pandemic initially led to a significant decrease in elective endoscopic examinations in Germany. The main reasons for this were the hard lockdown and the lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and testing procedures. Since then, international recommendations from profes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollerbach, S., Römmele, C., Muzalyova, A., Messmann, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11377-021-00582-8
_version_ 1784631344270147584
author Hollerbach, S.
Römmele, C.
Muzalyova, A.
Messmann, H.
author_facet Hollerbach, S.
Römmele, C.
Muzalyova, A.
Messmann, H.
author_sort Hollerbach, S.
collection PubMed
description In 2020, the coronavirus pandemic initially led to a significant decrease in elective endoscopic examinations in Germany. The main reasons for this were the hard lockdown and the lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and testing procedures. Since then, international recommendations from professional societies on infection control in endoscopy have been published. The extent to which these have been implemented in Germany is unclear: during the 2nd and 3rd waves in 2020/2021, most endoscopy units remained open and the level of adherence to international protection guidelines was high. A uniform “standard procedure” has not yet been published. The exact role and effectiveness of testing procedures to protect patients and staff during endoscopy was unknown, and reliable figures on staff and patient infections acquired/transmitted in endoscopy units in Germany were lacking. Thus, the most important finding of this work is the determined rate of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in endoscopy facilities. The data show that the infection rate among staff in German clinics and practices in early 2021 averaged up to 5%; most of these were acquired in the private setting. Clinics with gastroenterological endoscopy units had significantly higher infection rates (10%) than, for example, dental and otolaryngology practices. This result indicates the need for continued PPE efforts. The most important factors for infection safety are fully vaccinated (or recovered) staff and patients, a decreasing prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the use of PPE and—although controversial—the consistent use of screening tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8749920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87499202022-01-11 COVID-19 und Endoskopieeinheiten: Erfahrungen und Empfehlungen nach 2 Jahren Pandemie Hollerbach, S. Römmele, C. Muzalyova, A. Messmann, H. Gastroenterologe Schwerpunkt In 2020, the coronavirus pandemic initially led to a significant decrease in elective endoscopic examinations in Germany. The main reasons for this were the hard lockdown and the lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and testing procedures. Since then, international recommendations from professional societies on infection control in endoscopy have been published. The extent to which these have been implemented in Germany is unclear: during the 2nd and 3rd waves in 2020/2021, most endoscopy units remained open and the level of adherence to international protection guidelines was high. A uniform “standard procedure” has not yet been published. The exact role and effectiveness of testing procedures to protect patients and staff during endoscopy was unknown, and reliable figures on staff and patient infections acquired/transmitted in endoscopy units in Germany were lacking. Thus, the most important finding of this work is the determined rate of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in endoscopy facilities. The data show that the infection rate among staff in German clinics and practices in early 2021 averaged up to 5%; most of these were acquired in the private setting. Clinics with gastroenterological endoscopy units had significantly higher infection rates (10%) than, for example, dental and otolaryngology practices. This result indicates the need for continued PPE efforts. The most important factors for infection safety are fully vaccinated (or recovered) staff and patients, a decreasing prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the use of PPE and—although controversial—the consistent use of screening tests. Springer Medizin 2022-01-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8749920/ /pubmed/35035585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11377-021-00582-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Schwerpunkt
Hollerbach, S.
Römmele, C.
Muzalyova, A.
Messmann, H.
COVID-19 und Endoskopieeinheiten: Erfahrungen und Empfehlungen nach 2 Jahren Pandemie
title COVID-19 und Endoskopieeinheiten: Erfahrungen und Empfehlungen nach 2 Jahren Pandemie
title_full COVID-19 und Endoskopieeinheiten: Erfahrungen und Empfehlungen nach 2 Jahren Pandemie
title_fullStr COVID-19 und Endoskopieeinheiten: Erfahrungen und Empfehlungen nach 2 Jahren Pandemie
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 und Endoskopieeinheiten: Erfahrungen und Empfehlungen nach 2 Jahren Pandemie
title_short COVID-19 und Endoskopieeinheiten: Erfahrungen und Empfehlungen nach 2 Jahren Pandemie
title_sort covid-19 und endoskopieeinheiten: erfahrungen und empfehlungen nach 2 jahren pandemie
topic Schwerpunkt
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11377-021-00582-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hollerbachs covid19undendoskopieeinheitenerfahrungenundempfehlungennach2jahrenpandemie
AT rommelec covid19undendoskopieeinheitenerfahrungenundempfehlungennach2jahrenpandemie
AT muzalyovaa covid19undendoskopieeinheitenerfahrungenundempfehlungennach2jahrenpandemie
AT messmannh covid19undendoskopieeinheitenerfahrungenundempfehlungennach2jahrenpandemie