Cargando…

Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes

SIMPLE SUMMARY: After completion of acute cancer treatment, it is important to support patients in recovering physically and psychologically and to help them regain their social life. This is the goal of cancer rehabilitation. If we want to know which rehabilitation interventions are helpful, we mus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehmann, Jens, Rothmund, Maria, Riedl, David, Rumpold, Gerhard, Grote, Vincent, Fischer, Michael J., Holzner, Bernhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8750070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35008247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010084
_version_ 1784631377132519424
author Lehmann, Jens
Rothmund, Maria
Riedl, David
Rumpold, Gerhard
Grote, Vincent
Fischer, Michael J.
Holzner, Bernhard
author_facet Lehmann, Jens
Rothmund, Maria
Riedl, David
Rumpold, Gerhard
Grote, Vincent
Fischer, Michael J.
Holzner, Bernhard
author_sort Lehmann, Jens
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: After completion of acute cancer treatment, it is important to support patients in recovering physically and psychologically and to help them regain their social life. This is the goal of cancer rehabilitation. If we want to know which rehabilitation interventions are helpful, we must measure their effects. This can be done by asking clinicians, testing patients’ performance, observing their behaviors, or by asking patients directly about their experience. This paper focuses on reports from the patients. We give an overview of available questionnaires and offer advice regarding their use. Furthermore, we discuss how to integrate them into clinical practice and research. The most promising way to collect such data are electronic systems, which offer many advantages. The goal of assessing the patient perspective is to help patients, clinicians, and health insurance providers to decide which rehabilitation interventions suit patients’ needs, and therefore, which ones should be chosen and reimbursed. ABSTRACT: The aim of cancer rehabilitation is to help patients regain functioning and social participation. In order to evaluate and optimize rehabilitation, it is important to measure its outcomes in a structured way. In this article, we review the different types of clinical outcome assessments (COAs), including Clinician-Reported Outcomes (ClinROs), Observer-Reported Outcomes (ObsROs), Performance Outcomes (PerfOs), and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs). A special focus is placed on PROs, which are commonly defined as any direct report from the patient about their health condition without any interpretation by a third party. We provide a narrative review of available PRO measures (PROMs) for relevant outcomes, discuss the current state of PRO implementation in cancer rehabilitation, and highlight trends that use PROs to benchmark value-based care. Furthermore, we provide examples of PRO usage, highlight the benefits of electronic PRO (ePRO) collection, and offer advice on how to select, implement, and integrate PROs into the cancer rehabilitation setting to maximize efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8750070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87500702022-01-12 Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes Lehmann, Jens Rothmund, Maria Riedl, David Rumpold, Gerhard Grote, Vincent Fischer, Michael J. Holzner, Bernhard Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: After completion of acute cancer treatment, it is important to support patients in recovering physically and psychologically and to help them regain their social life. This is the goal of cancer rehabilitation. If we want to know which rehabilitation interventions are helpful, we must measure their effects. This can be done by asking clinicians, testing patients’ performance, observing their behaviors, or by asking patients directly about their experience. This paper focuses on reports from the patients. We give an overview of available questionnaires and offer advice regarding their use. Furthermore, we discuss how to integrate them into clinical practice and research. The most promising way to collect such data are electronic systems, which offer many advantages. The goal of assessing the patient perspective is to help patients, clinicians, and health insurance providers to decide which rehabilitation interventions suit patients’ needs, and therefore, which ones should be chosen and reimbursed. ABSTRACT: The aim of cancer rehabilitation is to help patients regain functioning and social participation. In order to evaluate and optimize rehabilitation, it is important to measure its outcomes in a structured way. In this article, we review the different types of clinical outcome assessments (COAs), including Clinician-Reported Outcomes (ClinROs), Observer-Reported Outcomes (ObsROs), Performance Outcomes (PerfOs), and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs). A special focus is placed on PROs, which are commonly defined as any direct report from the patient about their health condition without any interpretation by a third party. We provide a narrative review of available PRO measures (PROMs) for relevant outcomes, discuss the current state of PRO implementation in cancer rehabilitation, and highlight trends that use PROs to benchmark value-based care. Furthermore, we provide examples of PRO usage, highlight the benefits of electronic PRO (ePRO) collection, and offer advice on how to select, implement, and integrate PROs into the cancer rehabilitation setting to maximize efficiency. MDPI 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8750070/ /pubmed/35008247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010084 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Lehmann, Jens
Rothmund, Maria
Riedl, David
Rumpold, Gerhard
Grote, Vincent
Fischer, Michael J.
Holzner, Bernhard
Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes
title Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_full Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_fullStr Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_short Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_sort clinical outcome assessment in cancer rehabilitation and the central role of patient-reported outcomes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8750070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35008247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010084
work_keys_str_mv AT lehmannjens clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes
AT rothmundmaria clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes
AT riedldavid clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes
AT rumpoldgerhard clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes
AT grotevincent clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes
AT fischermichaelj clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes
AT holznerbernhard clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes