Cargando…
Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes
SIMPLE SUMMARY: After completion of acute cancer treatment, it is important to support patients in recovering physically and psychologically and to help them regain their social life. This is the goal of cancer rehabilitation. If we want to know which rehabilitation interventions are helpful, we mus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8750070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35008247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010084 |
_version_ | 1784631377132519424 |
---|---|
author | Lehmann, Jens Rothmund, Maria Riedl, David Rumpold, Gerhard Grote, Vincent Fischer, Michael J. Holzner, Bernhard |
author_facet | Lehmann, Jens Rothmund, Maria Riedl, David Rumpold, Gerhard Grote, Vincent Fischer, Michael J. Holzner, Bernhard |
author_sort | Lehmann, Jens |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: After completion of acute cancer treatment, it is important to support patients in recovering physically and psychologically and to help them regain their social life. This is the goal of cancer rehabilitation. If we want to know which rehabilitation interventions are helpful, we must measure their effects. This can be done by asking clinicians, testing patients’ performance, observing their behaviors, or by asking patients directly about their experience. This paper focuses on reports from the patients. We give an overview of available questionnaires and offer advice regarding their use. Furthermore, we discuss how to integrate them into clinical practice and research. The most promising way to collect such data are electronic systems, which offer many advantages. The goal of assessing the patient perspective is to help patients, clinicians, and health insurance providers to decide which rehabilitation interventions suit patients’ needs, and therefore, which ones should be chosen and reimbursed. ABSTRACT: The aim of cancer rehabilitation is to help patients regain functioning and social participation. In order to evaluate and optimize rehabilitation, it is important to measure its outcomes in a structured way. In this article, we review the different types of clinical outcome assessments (COAs), including Clinician-Reported Outcomes (ClinROs), Observer-Reported Outcomes (ObsROs), Performance Outcomes (PerfOs), and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs). A special focus is placed on PROs, which are commonly defined as any direct report from the patient about their health condition without any interpretation by a third party. We provide a narrative review of available PRO measures (PROMs) for relevant outcomes, discuss the current state of PRO implementation in cancer rehabilitation, and highlight trends that use PROs to benchmark value-based care. Furthermore, we provide examples of PRO usage, highlight the benefits of electronic PRO (ePRO) collection, and offer advice on how to select, implement, and integrate PROs into the cancer rehabilitation setting to maximize efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8750070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87500702022-01-12 Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes Lehmann, Jens Rothmund, Maria Riedl, David Rumpold, Gerhard Grote, Vincent Fischer, Michael J. Holzner, Bernhard Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: After completion of acute cancer treatment, it is important to support patients in recovering physically and psychologically and to help them regain their social life. This is the goal of cancer rehabilitation. If we want to know which rehabilitation interventions are helpful, we must measure their effects. This can be done by asking clinicians, testing patients’ performance, observing their behaviors, or by asking patients directly about their experience. This paper focuses on reports from the patients. We give an overview of available questionnaires and offer advice regarding their use. Furthermore, we discuss how to integrate them into clinical practice and research. The most promising way to collect such data are electronic systems, which offer many advantages. The goal of assessing the patient perspective is to help patients, clinicians, and health insurance providers to decide which rehabilitation interventions suit patients’ needs, and therefore, which ones should be chosen and reimbursed. ABSTRACT: The aim of cancer rehabilitation is to help patients regain functioning and social participation. In order to evaluate and optimize rehabilitation, it is important to measure its outcomes in a structured way. In this article, we review the different types of clinical outcome assessments (COAs), including Clinician-Reported Outcomes (ClinROs), Observer-Reported Outcomes (ObsROs), Performance Outcomes (PerfOs), and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs). A special focus is placed on PROs, which are commonly defined as any direct report from the patient about their health condition without any interpretation by a third party. We provide a narrative review of available PRO measures (PROMs) for relevant outcomes, discuss the current state of PRO implementation in cancer rehabilitation, and highlight trends that use PROs to benchmark value-based care. Furthermore, we provide examples of PRO usage, highlight the benefits of electronic PRO (ePRO) collection, and offer advice on how to select, implement, and integrate PROs into the cancer rehabilitation setting to maximize efficiency. MDPI 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8750070/ /pubmed/35008247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010084 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Lehmann, Jens Rothmund, Maria Riedl, David Rumpold, Gerhard Grote, Vincent Fischer, Michael J. Holzner, Bernhard Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes |
title | Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes |
title_full | Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes |
title_short | Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes |
title_sort | clinical outcome assessment in cancer rehabilitation and the central role of patient-reported outcomes |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8750070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35008247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lehmannjens clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes AT rothmundmaria clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes AT riedldavid clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes AT rumpoldgerhard clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes AT grotevincent clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes AT fischermichaelj clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes AT holznerbernhard clinicaloutcomeassessmentincancerrehabilitationandthecentralroleofpatientreportedoutcomes |