Cargando…

Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Chemoradiotherapy for Anal Canal Cancer—Single Institution Experience

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Eligible patients received PBS IMPT at a single institution. Treatment was administered in two volumes: 1—tumour with margins plus involved lymph nodes; 2—regional lymph node groups: perirectal (mesorectal), obturatory, inguinal, internal, external, and common iliac. The total doses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vítek, Pavel, Kubeš, Jiří, Vondráček, Vladimír, Andrlik, Michal, Navrátíl, Matěj, Zapletal, Radek, Haas, Alexandra, Dědečková, Kateřina, Ondrová, Barbora, Grebenyuk, Alexander, Rosina, Jozef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8750423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35008349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010185
_version_ 1784631455811371008
author Vítek, Pavel
Kubeš, Jiří
Vondráček, Vladimír
Andrlik, Michal
Navrátíl, Matěj
Zapletal, Radek
Haas, Alexandra
Dědečková, Kateřina
Ondrová, Barbora
Grebenyuk, Alexander
Rosina, Jozef
author_facet Vítek, Pavel
Kubeš, Jiří
Vondráček, Vladimír
Andrlik, Michal
Navrátíl, Matěj
Zapletal, Radek
Haas, Alexandra
Dědečková, Kateřina
Ondrová, Barbora
Grebenyuk, Alexander
Rosina, Jozef
author_sort Vítek, Pavel
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Eligible patients received PBS IMPT at a single institution. Treatment was administered in two volumes: 1—tumour with margins plus involved lymph nodes; 2—regional lymph node groups: perirectal (mesorectal), obturatory, inguinal, internal, external, and common iliac. The total doses of 57.5 GyE and 45 GyE, respectively, were administered in volumes 1 and 2 in 25 fractions, 5 fractions per week, respectively (a simultaneous integrated boost). Concomitant chemotherapy cisplatinum (CDDP) plus 5-FU or CDDP plus capecitabine was administered as per protocol. This single-institution study showed the high efficacy of PBS IMPT, achieving a high rate of complete regression. The 2-year overall survival, relapse-free survival and colostomy-free survival were 94.2, 93.8 and 91.0%, respectively. The haematological acute toxicity of grade 3–4 remained low. The acute toxicity completely resolved in all patients and had no lethal outcomes. ABSTRACT: Background: A favourable dose distribution has been described for proton beam therapy (PBT) of anal cancer in dosimetric studies. The relationship between dosimetric parameters in bone marrow and haematologic toxicity, treatment interruptions, and treatment efficacy has also been documented. There are only few references on clinical results of PBT for anal cancer. The primary objective of the retrospective study was to assess the efficacy of pencil beam scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy (PBS IMPT) in the definitive chemoradiotherapy of anal cancer. Secondary objectives were established to identify the risks of acute chronic toxicity risks and to assess colostomy rates. Materials and methods: Patients were treated for biopsy-proven squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the anus at initial or advanced stages. Eligible patients received PBS IMPT at a single institution. Treatment was administered in two volumes: 1—tumour with margins plus involved lymph nodes; 2—regional lymph node groups: perirectal (mesorectal), obturatory, inguinal, internal, external, and common iliac. The total doses of 57.5 GyE and 45 GyE, respectively, were administered in volumes 1 and 2 in 25 fractions, 5 fractions per week, respectively (a simultaneous integrated boost). Concomitant chemotherapy cisplatinum (CDDP) plus 5-FU or CDDP plus capecitabine was administered as per protocol. The treatment effect was assessed using DRE (digital rectal examination) and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) within the follow-up period. Toxicity was scaled using CTCAE version 4.0 criteria. Results: 39 of 41 patients treated during the period of February 2014–August 2021 were eligible for analysis. All patients completed treatment, 76.9% without interruption. The median treatment time was 35 days (32–35). The median follow-up period was 30 months, 34 patients are alive to-date, 5 patients died prior to the date of analysis, and 2 deaths were unrelated to the primary disease. The 2-year overall survival, relapse-free survival, and colostomy-free survival were 94.2%, 93.8%, and 91.0%, respectively. Complete regression was achieved in 36 patients (92.3%), partial regression was achieved in 2 (5.1%), and immediate progression at end of treatment occurred in 1 patient (2.6%). Salvage resection was indicated for two patients in partial regression and due to severe chronic dermatologic toxicity. The grade 3 and 4 haematological toxicity rates were 7.7% and 5.1%, respectively. The most frequent non-haematological acute toxicities of grade 3–4 observed were dermatitis (23.1%), diarrhoea (7.7%), and dehydration (7.7%). Chronic toxicity emerged predominantly as skin atrophy/ulceration grade 2 (26.5%) and grade 3–4 (5.8%), and radiation proctitis grade 2 (38.2%) and grade 3 (2.9%). Discussion, conclusions: This single-institution study showed the high efficacy of PBS IMPT, achieving a high rate of complete regression. The haematological acute toxicity of grade 3–4 remained low; however, the impact of altered chemotherapy (CDDP instead of mitomycin C) remains unclear. The incidence of other acute toxicities shares similarity with photon therapy investigated in large studies. The acute toxicity completely resolved in all patients, had no lethal outcomes, and never resulted in the necessity for colostomy. By contrast, it was chronic toxicity, skin ulceration, perirectal fistulation, and fibrosis that resulted in salvage surgery and/or the need for a colostomy. A challenging question remains: to what extent can PBT prevent chronic toxicity? Longer follow-up remains necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8750423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87504232022-01-12 Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Chemoradiotherapy for Anal Canal Cancer—Single Institution Experience Vítek, Pavel Kubeš, Jiří Vondráček, Vladimír Andrlik, Michal Navrátíl, Matěj Zapletal, Radek Haas, Alexandra Dědečková, Kateřina Ondrová, Barbora Grebenyuk, Alexander Rosina, Jozef Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Eligible patients received PBS IMPT at a single institution. Treatment was administered in two volumes: 1—tumour with margins plus involved lymph nodes; 2—regional lymph node groups: perirectal (mesorectal), obturatory, inguinal, internal, external, and common iliac. The total doses of 57.5 GyE and 45 GyE, respectively, were administered in volumes 1 and 2 in 25 fractions, 5 fractions per week, respectively (a simultaneous integrated boost). Concomitant chemotherapy cisplatinum (CDDP) plus 5-FU or CDDP plus capecitabine was administered as per protocol. This single-institution study showed the high efficacy of PBS IMPT, achieving a high rate of complete regression. The 2-year overall survival, relapse-free survival and colostomy-free survival were 94.2, 93.8 and 91.0%, respectively. The haematological acute toxicity of grade 3–4 remained low. The acute toxicity completely resolved in all patients and had no lethal outcomes. ABSTRACT: Background: A favourable dose distribution has been described for proton beam therapy (PBT) of anal cancer in dosimetric studies. The relationship between dosimetric parameters in bone marrow and haematologic toxicity, treatment interruptions, and treatment efficacy has also been documented. There are only few references on clinical results of PBT for anal cancer. The primary objective of the retrospective study was to assess the efficacy of pencil beam scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy (PBS IMPT) in the definitive chemoradiotherapy of anal cancer. Secondary objectives were established to identify the risks of acute chronic toxicity risks and to assess colostomy rates. Materials and methods: Patients were treated for biopsy-proven squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the anus at initial or advanced stages. Eligible patients received PBS IMPT at a single institution. Treatment was administered in two volumes: 1—tumour with margins plus involved lymph nodes; 2—regional lymph node groups: perirectal (mesorectal), obturatory, inguinal, internal, external, and common iliac. The total doses of 57.5 GyE and 45 GyE, respectively, were administered in volumes 1 and 2 in 25 fractions, 5 fractions per week, respectively (a simultaneous integrated boost). Concomitant chemotherapy cisplatinum (CDDP) plus 5-FU or CDDP plus capecitabine was administered as per protocol. The treatment effect was assessed using DRE (digital rectal examination) and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) within the follow-up period. Toxicity was scaled using CTCAE version 4.0 criteria. Results: 39 of 41 patients treated during the period of February 2014–August 2021 were eligible for analysis. All patients completed treatment, 76.9% without interruption. The median treatment time was 35 days (32–35). The median follow-up period was 30 months, 34 patients are alive to-date, 5 patients died prior to the date of analysis, and 2 deaths were unrelated to the primary disease. The 2-year overall survival, relapse-free survival, and colostomy-free survival were 94.2%, 93.8%, and 91.0%, respectively. Complete regression was achieved in 36 patients (92.3%), partial regression was achieved in 2 (5.1%), and immediate progression at end of treatment occurred in 1 patient (2.6%). Salvage resection was indicated for two patients in partial regression and due to severe chronic dermatologic toxicity. The grade 3 and 4 haematological toxicity rates were 7.7% and 5.1%, respectively. The most frequent non-haematological acute toxicities of grade 3–4 observed were dermatitis (23.1%), diarrhoea (7.7%), and dehydration (7.7%). Chronic toxicity emerged predominantly as skin atrophy/ulceration grade 2 (26.5%) and grade 3–4 (5.8%), and radiation proctitis grade 2 (38.2%) and grade 3 (2.9%). Discussion, conclusions: This single-institution study showed the high efficacy of PBS IMPT, achieving a high rate of complete regression. The haematological acute toxicity of grade 3–4 remained low; however, the impact of altered chemotherapy (CDDP instead of mitomycin C) remains unclear. The incidence of other acute toxicities shares similarity with photon therapy investigated in large studies. The acute toxicity completely resolved in all patients, had no lethal outcomes, and never resulted in the necessity for colostomy. By contrast, it was chronic toxicity, skin ulceration, perirectal fistulation, and fibrosis that resulted in salvage surgery and/or the need for a colostomy. A challenging question remains: to what extent can PBT prevent chronic toxicity? Longer follow-up remains necessary. MDPI 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8750423/ /pubmed/35008349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010185 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vítek, Pavel
Kubeš, Jiří
Vondráček, Vladimír
Andrlik, Michal
Navrátíl, Matěj
Zapletal, Radek
Haas, Alexandra
Dědečková, Kateřina
Ondrová, Barbora
Grebenyuk, Alexander
Rosina, Jozef
Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Chemoradiotherapy for Anal Canal Cancer—Single Institution Experience
title Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Chemoradiotherapy for Anal Canal Cancer—Single Institution Experience
title_full Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Chemoradiotherapy for Anal Canal Cancer—Single Institution Experience
title_fullStr Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Chemoradiotherapy for Anal Canal Cancer—Single Institution Experience
title_full_unstemmed Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Chemoradiotherapy for Anal Canal Cancer—Single Institution Experience
title_short Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Chemoradiotherapy for Anal Canal Cancer—Single Institution Experience
title_sort pencil beam scanning (pbs) intensity-modulated proton therapy (impt) chemoradiotherapy for anal canal cancer—single institution experience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8750423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35008349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010185
work_keys_str_mv AT vitekpavel pencilbeamscanningpbsintensitymodulatedprotontherapyimptchemoradiotherapyforanalcanalcancersingleinstitutionexperience
AT kubesjiri pencilbeamscanningpbsintensitymodulatedprotontherapyimptchemoradiotherapyforanalcanalcancersingleinstitutionexperience
AT vondracekvladimir pencilbeamscanningpbsintensitymodulatedprotontherapyimptchemoradiotherapyforanalcanalcancersingleinstitutionexperience
AT andrlikmichal pencilbeamscanningpbsintensitymodulatedprotontherapyimptchemoradiotherapyforanalcanalcancersingleinstitutionexperience
AT navratilmatej pencilbeamscanningpbsintensitymodulatedprotontherapyimptchemoradiotherapyforanalcanalcancersingleinstitutionexperience
AT zapletalradek pencilbeamscanningpbsintensitymodulatedprotontherapyimptchemoradiotherapyforanalcanalcancersingleinstitutionexperience
AT haasalexandra pencilbeamscanningpbsintensitymodulatedprotontherapyimptchemoradiotherapyforanalcanalcancersingleinstitutionexperience
AT dedeckovakaterina pencilbeamscanningpbsintensitymodulatedprotontherapyimptchemoradiotherapyforanalcanalcancersingleinstitutionexperience
AT ondrovabarbora pencilbeamscanningpbsintensitymodulatedprotontherapyimptchemoradiotherapyforanalcanalcancersingleinstitutionexperience
AT grebenyukalexander pencilbeamscanningpbsintensitymodulatedprotontherapyimptchemoradiotherapyforanalcanalcancersingleinstitutionexperience
AT rosinajozef pencilbeamscanningpbsintensitymodulatedprotontherapyimptchemoradiotherapyforanalcanalcancersingleinstitutionexperience