Cargando…
Spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in Arkansas and Kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, March – November 2020()
PURPOSE: To examine the time-varying reproduction number, R(t), for COVID-19 in Arkansas and Kentucky and investigate the impact of policies and preventative measures on the variability in R(t). METHODS: Arkansas and Kentucky county-level COVID-19 cumulative case count data (March 6-November 7, 2020...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8750695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.12.012 |
_version_ | 1784631519307890688 |
---|---|
author | Politis, Maria D. Hua, Xinyi Ogwara, Chigozie A. Davies, Margaret R. Adebile, Temitayo M. Sherman, Maya P. Zhou, Xiaolu Chowell, Gerardo Spaulding, Anne C. Fung, Isaac Chun-Hai |
author_facet | Politis, Maria D. Hua, Xinyi Ogwara, Chigozie A. Davies, Margaret R. Adebile, Temitayo M. Sherman, Maya P. Zhou, Xiaolu Chowell, Gerardo Spaulding, Anne C. Fung, Isaac Chun-Hai |
author_sort | Politis, Maria D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To examine the time-varying reproduction number, R(t), for COVID-19 in Arkansas and Kentucky and investigate the impact of policies and preventative measures on the variability in R(t). METHODS: Arkansas and Kentucky county-level COVID-19 cumulative case count data (March 6-November 7, 2020) were obtained. R(t) was estimated using the R package ‘EpiEstim’, by county, region (Delta, non-Delta, Appalachian, non-Appalachian), and policy measures. RESULTS: The R(t) was initially high, falling below 1 in May or June depending on the region, before stabilizing around 1 in the later months. The median R(t) for Arkansas and Kentucky at the end of the study were 1.15 (95% credible interval [CrI], 1.13, 1.18) and 1.10 (95% CrI, 1.08, 1.12), respectively, and remained above 1 for the non-Appalachian region. R(t) decreased when facial coverings were mandated, changing by -10.64% (95% CrI, -10.60%, -10.70%) in Arkansas and -5.93% (95% CrI, -4.31%, -7.65%) in Kentucky. The trends in R(t) estimates were mostly associated with the implementation and relaxation of social distancing measures. CONCLUSIONS: Arkansas and Kentucky maintained a median R(t) above 1 during the entire study period. Changes in R(t) estimates allow quantitative estimates of potential impact of policies such as facemask mandate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8750695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87506952022-01-11 Spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in Arkansas and Kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, March – November 2020() Politis, Maria D. Hua, Xinyi Ogwara, Chigozie A. Davies, Margaret R. Adebile, Temitayo M. Sherman, Maya P. Zhou, Xiaolu Chowell, Gerardo Spaulding, Anne C. Fung, Isaac Chun-Hai Ann Epidemiol Original Article PURPOSE: To examine the time-varying reproduction number, R(t), for COVID-19 in Arkansas and Kentucky and investigate the impact of policies and preventative measures on the variability in R(t). METHODS: Arkansas and Kentucky county-level COVID-19 cumulative case count data (March 6-November 7, 2020) were obtained. R(t) was estimated using the R package ‘EpiEstim’, by county, region (Delta, non-Delta, Appalachian, non-Appalachian), and policy measures. RESULTS: The R(t) was initially high, falling below 1 in May or June depending on the region, before stabilizing around 1 in the later months. The median R(t) for Arkansas and Kentucky at the end of the study were 1.15 (95% credible interval [CrI], 1.13, 1.18) and 1.10 (95% CrI, 1.08, 1.12), respectively, and remained above 1 for the non-Appalachian region. R(t) decreased when facial coverings were mandated, changing by -10.64% (95% CrI, -10.60%, -10.70%) in Arkansas and -5.93% (95% CrI, -4.31%, -7.65%) in Kentucky. The trends in R(t) estimates were mostly associated with the implementation and relaxation of social distancing measures. CONCLUSIONS: Arkansas and Kentucky maintained a median R(t) above 1 during the entire study period. Changes in R(t) estimates allow quantitative estimates of potential impact of policies such as facemask mandate. Elsevier Inc. 2022-04 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8750695/ /pubmed/35031444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.12.012 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Politis, Maria D. Hua, Xinyi Ogwara, Chigozie A. Davies, Margaret R. Adebile, Temitayo M. Sherman, Maya P. Zhou, Xiaolu Chowell, Gerardo Spaulding, Anne C. Fung, Isaac Chun-Hai Spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in Arkansas and Kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, March – November 2020() |
title | Spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in Arkansas and Kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, March – November 2020() |
title_full | Spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in Arkansas and Kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, March – November 2020() |
title_fullStr | Spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in Arkansas and Kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, March – November 2020() |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in Arkansas and Kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, March – November 2020() |
title_short | Spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in Arkansas and Kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, March – November 2020() |
title_sort | spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of sars-cov-2 in arkansas and kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, march – november 2020() |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8750695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.12.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT politismariad spatiallyrefinedtimevaryingreproductionnumbersofsarscov2inarkansasandkentuckyandtheirrelationshiptopopulationsizeandpublichealthpolicymarchnovember2020 AT huaxinyi spatiallyrefinedtimevaryingreproductionnumbersofsarscov2inarkansasandkentuckyandtheirrelationshiptopopulationsizeandpublichealthpolicymarchnovember2020 AT ogwarachigoziea spatiallyrefinedtimevaryingreproductionnumbersofsarscov2inarkansasandkentuckyandtheirrelationshiptopopulationsizeandpublichealthpolicymarchnovember2020 AT daviesmargaretr spatiallyrefinedtimevaryingreproductionnumbersofsarscov2inarkansasandkentuckyandtheirrelationshiptopopulationsizeandpublichealthpolicymarchnovember2020 AT adebiletemitayom spatiallyrefinedtimevaryingreproductionnumbersofsarscov2inarkansasandkentuckyandtheirrelationshiptopopulationsizeandpublichealthpolicymarchnovember2020 AT shermanmayap spatiallyrefinedtimevaryingreproductionnumbersofsarscov2inarkansasandkentuckyandtheirrelationshiptopopulationsizeandpublichealthpolicymarchnovember2020 AT zhouxiaolu spatiallyrefinedtimevaryingreproductionnumbersofsarscov2inarkansasandkentuckyandtheirrelationshiptopopulationsizeandpublichealthpolicymarchnovember2020 AT chowellgerardo spatiallyrefinedtimevaryingreproductionnumbersofsarscov2inarkansasandkentuckyandtheirrelationshiptopopulationsizeandpublichealthpolicymarchnovember2020 AT spauldingannec spatiallyrefinedtimevaryingreproductionnumbersofsarscov2inarkansasandkentuckyandtheirrelationshiptopopulationsizeandpublichealthpolicymarchnovember2020 AT fungisaacchunhai spatiallyrefinedtimevaryingreproductionnumbersofsarscov2inarkansasandkentuckyandtheirrelationshiptopopulationsizeandpublichealthpolicymarchnovember2020 |