Feasibility of Synthetic Computed Tomography Images Generated from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans Using Various Deep Learning Methods in the Planning of Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

SIMPLE SUMMARY: MRI-only simulation in radiation therapy (RT) planning has received attention because the CT scan can be omitted. For MRI-only simulation, synthetic CT (sCT) is necessary for the dose calculation. Various methodologies have been suggested for the generation of sCT and, recently, methods using the deep learning approaches are actively investigated. GAN and cycle-consistent GAN (CycGAN) have been mainly tested, however, very limited studies compared the qualities of sCTs generated from these methods or suggested other models for sCT generation. We have compared GAN, CycGAN, and, reference-guided GAN (RgGAN), a new model of deep learning method. We found that the performance in the HU conservation for soft tissue was poorest for GAN. All methods could generate sCTs feasible for VMAT planning with the trend that sCT generated from the RgGAN showed best performance in dosimetric conservation D(98%) and D(95%) than sCTs from other methodologies. ABSTRACT: We aimed to evaluate and compare the qualities of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) generated by various deep-learning methods in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for prostate cancer. Simulation computed tomography (CT) and T2-weighted simulation magnetic resonance image from 113 patients were used in the sCT generation by three deep-learning approaches: generative adversarial network (GAN), cycle-consistent GAN (CycGAN), and reference-guided CycGAN (RgGAN), a new model which performed further adjustment of sCTs generated by CycGAN with available paired images. VMAT plans on the original simulation CT images were recalculated on the sCTs and the dosimetric differences were evaluated. For soft tissue, a significant difference in the mean Hounsfield unites (HUs) was observed between the original CT images and only sCTs from GAN (p = 0.03). The mean relative dose differences for planning target volumes or organs at risk were within 2% among the sCTs from the three deep-learning approaches. The differences in dosimetric parameters for D(98%) and D(95%) from original CT were lowest in sCT from RgGAN. In conclusion, HU conservation for soft tissue was poorest for GAN. There was the trend that sCT generated from the RgGAN showed best performance in dosimetric conservation D(98%) and D(95%) than sCTs from other methodologies.