Cargando…
Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review
Tug-of-war (TOW) is an internationally played activity including professional and amateur athletes, defined as early as 4000 years ago (as a rope-less version) in the artwork on Egyptian tomb engravings, and is played as per the rules laid out by TWIF, which has 73 member countries and administrativ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010003 |
_version_ | 1784631611186216960 |
---|---|
author | Cayero, Ruth Rocandio, Valentín Zubillaga, Asier Refoyo, Ignacio Calleja-González, Julio Castañeda-Babarro, Arkaitz Martínez de Aldama, Inmaculada |
author_facet | Cayero, Ruth Rocandio, Valentín Zubillaga, Asier Refoyo, Ignacio Calleja-González, Julio Castañeda-Babarro, Arkaitz Martínez de Aldama, Inmaculada |
author_sort | Cayero, Ruth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tug-of-war (TOW) is an internationally played activity including professional and amateur athletes, defined as early as 4000 years ago (as a rope-less version) in the artwork on Egyptian tomb engravings, and is played as per the rules laid out by TWIF, which has 73 member countries and administrative headquarters in the USA. Typically, two teams of “pullers” participate and apply enormous contra directional forces on the pulling rope. Originally, two types of competition are used: knockout and points. This narrative review describes the scientific state of the art of TOW. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous information has been published on this topic. Anthropometric parameters for competitors are near 83.6, lean body mass 69.4, and body fat 16. The VO(2MAX) is 55.8 mL/kg/min. In terms of relative strength, the dynamic leg power is 4659.8 N. Endurance TOW elicits minimal muscle damage. Injured strains and sprains comprised over half of all injuries: back (42%), shoulder–upper limb (23%) and knee (17%). Pulling movement in TOW contests can be divided into three phases, namely the “drop”, “hold” and “drive” phases. The maximal pulling force was 1041.6 ± 123.9 N. The percentage of dynamic pulling force in the static maximal pulling force was 75.5 ± 14.4% and the dynamic ranged from 106.4 to 182.5%. There are two gripping styles: indoor and outdoor. The friction characteristics between surface and shoe in TOW is important in determining a suitable shoe for indoor TOW. A waist belt might be a useful piece of equipment for TOW sport. The EMG technique in TOW entails a high degree of dorsal muscle activity during the pulling. The factor of force vanishing was the coordination among athletes. The force vanishing percentage goes from 8.82 ± 5.59 for two contenders to 19.74 ± 2.22 for eight athletes, 6.4% in the sum of two pullers. However, in the drop phase, for female elite TOW team, only the 0.5% of the pulling force was wasted. Future studies are need in order to understand better this historical sport activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8751099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87510992022-01-12 Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review Cayero, Ruth Rocandio, Valentín Zubillaga, Asier Refoyo, Ignacio Calleja-González, Julio Castañeda-Babarro, Arkaitz Martínez de Aldama, Inmaculada Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Tug-of-war (TOW) is an internationally played activity including professional and amateur athletes, defined as early as 4000 years ago (as a rope-less version) in the artwork on Egyptian tomb engravings, and is played as per the rules laid out by TWIF, which has 73 member countries and administrative headquarters in the USA. Typically, two teams of “pullers” participate and apply enormous contra directional forces on the pulling rope. Originally, two types of competition are used: knockout and points. This narrative review describes the scientific state of the art of TOW. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous information has been published on this topic. Anthropometric parameters for competitors are near 83.6, lean body mass 69.4, and body fat 16. The VO(2MAX) is 55.8 mL/kg/min. In terms of relative strength, the dynamic leg power is 4659.8 N. Endurance TOW elicits minimal muscle damage. Injured strains and sprains comprised over half of all injuries: back (42%), shoulder–upper limb (23%) and knee (17%). Pulling movement in TOW contests can be divided into three phases, namely the “drop”, “hold” and “drive” phases. The maximal pulling force was 1041.6 ± 123.9 N. The percentage of dynamic pulling force in the static maximal pulling force was 75.5 ± 14.4% and the dynamic ranged from 106.4 to 182.5%. There are two gripping styles: indoor and outdoor. The friction characteristics between surface and shoe in TOW is important in determining a suitable shoe for indoor TOW. A waist belt might be a useful piece of equipment for TOW sport. The EMG technique in TOW entails a high degree of dorsal muscle activity during the pulling. The factor of force vanishing was the coordination among athletes. The force vanishing percentage goes from 8.82 ± 5.59 for two contenders to 19.74 ± 2.22 for eight athletes, 6.4% in the sum of two pullers. However, in the drop phase, for female elite TOW team, only the 0.5% of the pulling force was wasted. Future studies are need in order to understand better this historical sport activity. MDPI 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8751099/ /pubmed/35010268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010003 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Cayero, Ruth Rocandio, Valentín Zubillaga, Asier Refoyo, Ignacio Calleja-González, Julio Castañeda-Babarro, Arkaitz Martínez de Aldama, Inmaculada Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review |
title | Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review |
title_full | Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review |
title_short | Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review |
title_sort | analysis of tug of war competition: a narrative complete review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cayeroruth analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview AT rocandiovalentin analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview AT zubillagaasier analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview AT refoyoignacio analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview AT callejagonzalezjulio analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview AT castanedababarroarkaitz analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview AT martinezdealdamainmaculada analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview |