Cargando…

Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review

Tug-of-war (TOW) is an internationally played activity including professional and amateur athletes, defined as early as 4000 years ago (as a rope-less version) in the artwork on Egyptian tomb engravings, and is played as per the rules laid out by TWIF, which has 73 member countries and administrativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cayero, Ruth, Rocandio, Valentín, Zubillaga, Asier, Refoyo, Ignacio, Calleja-González, Julio, Castañeda-Babarro, Arkaitz, Martínez de Aldama, Inmaculada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010003
_version_ 1784631611186216960
author Cayero, Ruth
Rocandio, Valentín
Zubillaga, Asier
Refoyo, Ignacio
Calleja-González, Julio
Castañeda-Babarro, Arkaitz
Martínez de Aldama, Inmaculada
author_facet Cayero, Ruth
Rocandio, Valentín
Zubillaga, Asier
Refoyo, Ignacio
Calleja-González, Julio
Castañeda-Babarro, Arkaitz
Martínez de Aldama, Inmaculada
author_sort Cayero, Ruth
collection PubMed
description Tug-of-war (TOW) is an internationally played activity including professional and amateur athletes, defined as early as 4000 years ago (as a rope-less version) in the artwork on Egyptian tomb engravings, and is played as per the rules laid out by TWIF, which has 73 member countries and administrative headquarters in the USA. Typically, two teams of “pullers” participate and apply enormous contra directional forces on the pulling rope. Originally, two types of competition are used: knockout and points. This narrative review describes the scientific state of the art of TOW. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous information has been published on this topic. Anthropometric parameters for competitors are near 83.6, lean body mass 69.4, and body fat 16. The VO(2MAX) is 55.8 mL/kg/min. In terms of relative strength, the dynamic leg power is 4659.8 N. Endurance TOW elicits minimal muscle damage. Injured strains and sprains comprised over half of all injuries: back (42%), shoulder–upper limb (23%) and knee (17%). Pulling movement in TOW contests can be divided into three phases, namely the “drop”, “hold” and “drive” phases. The maximal pulling force was 1041.6 ± 123.9 N. The percentage of dynamic pulling force in the static maximal pulling force was 75.5 ± 14.4% and the dynamic ranged from 106.4 to 182.5%. There are two gripping styles: indoor and outdoor. The friction characteristics between surface and shoe in TOW is important in determining a suitable shoe for indoor TOW. A waist belt might be a useful piece of equipment for TOW sport. The EMG technique in TOW entails a high degree of dorsal muscle activity during the pulling. The factor of force vanishing was the coordination among athletes. The force vanishing percentage goes from 8.82 ± 5.59 for two contenders to 19.74 ± 2.22 for eight athletes, 6.4% in the sum of two pullers. However, in the drop phase, for female elite TOW team, only the 0.5% of the pulling force was wasted. Future studies are need in order to understand better this historical sport activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8751099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87510992022-01-12 Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review Cayero, Ruth Rocandio, Valentín Zubillaga, Asier Refoyo, Ignacio Calleja-González, Julio Castañeda-Babarro, Arkaitz Martínez de Aldama, Inmaculada Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Tug-of-war (TOW) is an internationally played activity including professional and amateur athletes, defined as early as 4000 years ago (as a rope-less version) in the artwork on Egyptian tomb engravings, and is played as per the rules laid out by TWIF, which has 73 member countries and administrative headquarters in the USA. Typically, two teams of “pullers” participate and apply enormous contra directional forces on the pulling rope. Originally, two types of competition are used: knockout and points. This narrative review describes the scientific state of the art of TOW. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous information has been published on this topic. Anthropometric parameters for competitors are near 83.6, lean body mass 69.4, and body fat 16. The VO(2MAX) is 55.8 mL/kg/min. In terms of relative strength, the dynamic leg power is 4659.8 N. Endurance TOW elicits minimal muscle damage. Injured strains and sprains comprised over half of all injuries: back (42%), shoulder–upper limb (23%) and knee (17%). Pulling movement in TOW contests can be divided into three phases, namely the “drop”, “hold” and “drive” phases. The maximal pulling force was 1041.6 ± 123.9 N. The percentage of dynamic pulling force in the static maximal pulling force was 75.5 ± 14.4% and the dynamic ranged from 106.4 to 182.5%. There are two gripping styles: indoor and outdoor. The friction characteristics between surface and shoe in TOW is important in determining a suitable shoe for indoor TOW. A waist belt might be a useful piece of equipment for TOW sport. The EMG technique in TOW entails a high degree of dorsal muscle activity during the pulling. The factor of force vanishing was the coordination among athletes. The force vanishing percentage goes from 8.82 ± 5.59 for two contenders to 19.74 ± 2.22 for eight athletes, 6.4% in the sum of two pullers. However, in the drop phase, for female elite TOW team, only the 0.5% of the pulling force was wasted. Future studies are need in order to understand better this historical sport activity. MDPI 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8751099/ /pubmed/35010268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010003 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cayero, Ruth
Rocandio, Valentín
Zubillaga, Asier
Refoyo, Ignacio
Calleja-González, Julio
Castañeda-Babarro, Arkaitz
Martínez de Aldama, Inmaculada
Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review
title Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review
title_full Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review
title_fullStr Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review
title_short Analysis of Tug of War Competition: A Narrative Complete Review
title_sort analysis of tug of war competition: a narrative complete review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010003
work_keys_str_mv AT cayeroruth analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview
AT rocandiovalentin analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview
AT zubillagaasier analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview
AT refoyoignacio analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview
AT callejagonzalezjulio analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview
AT castanedababarroarkaitz analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview
AT martinezdealdamainmaculada analysisoftugofwarcompetitionanarrativecompletereview