Cargando…

Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices at School: A Systematic Literature Review

Background: In recent years, the use of restorative justice (RJ) and restorative practices (RP) in schools has grown rapidly. Understanding how theory and research address this topic is important for its practical implementation based on scientific knowledge. The aim of this article was to analyse t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lodi, Ernesto, Perrella, Lucrezia, Lepri, Gian Luigi, Scarpa, Maria Luisa, Patrizi, Patrizia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010355
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010096
_version_ 1784631640512790528
author Lodi, Ernesto
Perrella, Lucrezia
Lepri, Gian Luigi
Scarpa, Maria Luisa
Patrizi, Patrizia
author_facet Lodi, Ernesto
Perrella, Lucrezia
Lepri, Gian Luigi
Scarpa, Maria Luisa
Patrizi, Patrizia
author_sort Lodi, Ernesto
collection PubMed
description Background: In recent years, the use of restorative justice (RJ) and restorative practices (RP) in schools has grown rapidly. Understanding how theory and research address this topic is important for its practical implementation based on scientific knowledge. The aim of this article was to analyse the practices derived from RJ implemented in school and what kinds of results have been achieved. Starting from the analysis of the qualitative and quantitative research in the field, a systematic review was conducted on the last decade of studies using RJ and RP at every level of school education. Methods: For this review, methods including the PRISMA guidelines, the PRISMA flow diagram, and qualitative synthesis were carried out. Scientific articles for the literature review were selected according to the following criteria: (1) publication date between the years 2010–2021; (2) student population aged 6–18 years; (3) publications in the English language; (4) articles directly accessible or accessible by contacting the author(s); 34 articles met the inclusion criteria. Results: The most used RP in school are circles (n = 26), followed by restorative conferences (n = 17), peer mediation (n = 10), restorative conversations (n = 8), mediation (n = 7), community-building circles (n = 5). RP can improve the school climate, discipline, positive conflict management through actions that aim at preventing suspensions, exclusions, conflicts, and misbehaviours (e.g., bullying). RJ practices promote positive relationships between peers and between students and teachers, as well as to prosocial behaviours through the development of social and emotional skills. Conclusions: From the studies examined, a great interest in applying restorative justice and practices in schools clearly emerged. Discussions on the benefits and challenges of implementation were provided. However, there is still limited evidence in terms of direct correlation, which suggests further studies on the impact of RJ and RP in school settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8751228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87512282022-01-12 Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices at School: A Systematic Literature Review Lodi, Ernesto Perrella, Lucrezia Lepri, Gian Luigi Scarpa, Maria Luisa Patrizi, Patrizia Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Background: In recent years, the use of restorative justice (RJ) and restorative practices (RP) in schools has grown rapidly. Understanding how theory and research address this topic is important for its practical implementation based on scientific knowledge. The aim of this article was to analyse the practices derived from RJ implemented in school and what kinds of results have been achieved. Starting from the analysis of the qualitative and quantitative research in the field, a systematic review was conducted on the last decade of studies using RJ and RP at every level of school education. Methods: For this review, methods including the PRISMA guidelines, the PRISMA flow diagram, and qualitative synthesis were carried out. Scientific articles for the literature review were selected according to the following criteria: (1) publication date between the years 2010–2021; (2) student population aged 6–18 years; (3) publications in the English language; (4) articles directly accessible or accessible by contacting the author(s); 34 articles met the inclusion criteria. Results: The most used RP in school are circles (n = 26), followed by restorative conferences (n = 17), peer mediation (n = 10), restorative conversations (n = 8), mediation (n = 7), community-building circles (n = 5). RP can improve the school climate, discipline, positive conflict management through actions that aim at preventing suspensions, exclusions, conflicts, and misbehaviours (e.g., bullying). RJ practices promote positive relationships between peers and between students and teachers, as well as to prosocial behaviours through the development of social and emotional skills. Conclusions: From the studies examined, a great interest in applying restorative justice and practices in schools clearly emerged. Discussions on the benefits and challenges of implementation were provided. However, there is still limited evidence in terms of direct correlation, which suggests further studies on the impact of RJ and RP in school settings. MDPI 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8751228/ /pubmed/35010355 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010096 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Lodi, Ernesto
Perrella, Lucrezia
Lepri, Gian Luigi
Scarpa, Maria Luisa
Patrizi, Patrizia
Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices at School: A Systematic Literature Review
title Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices at School: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices at School: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices at School: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices at School: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Use of Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices at School: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort use of restorative justice and restorative practices at school: a systematic literature review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010355
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010096
work_keys_str_mv AT lodiernesto useofrestorativejusticeandrestorativepracticesatschoolasystematicliteraturereview
AT perrellalucrezia useofrestorativejusticeandrestorativepracticesatschoolasystematicliteraturereview
AT leprigianluigi useofrestorativejusticeandrestorativepracticesatschoolasystematicliteraturereview
AT scarpamarialuisa useofrestorativejusticeandrestorativepracticesatschoolasystematicliteraturereview
AT patrizipatrizia useofrestorativejusticeandrestorativepracticesatschoolasystematicliteraturereview