Cargando…
What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System
PURPOSE: Quality improvement is an international priority, and health organisations invest heavily in this endeavour. Little, however, is known of the role and perspectives of Quality Improvement Managers who are responsible for quality improvement implementation. We explored the quality improvement...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35012524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07433-w |
_version_ | 1784631652529471488 |
---|---|
author | Akmal, Adeel Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya Stokes, Tim Foote, Jeff Greatbanks, Richard Gauld, Robin |
author_facet | Akmal, Adeel Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya Stokes, Tim Foote, Jeff Greatbanks, Richard Gauld, Robin |
author_sort | Akmal, Adeel |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Quality improvement is an international priority, and health organisations invest heavily in this endeavour. Little, however, is known of the role and perspectives of Quality Improvement Managers who are responsible for quality improvement implementation. We explored the quality improvement managers’ accounts of what competencies and qualities they require to achieve day-to-day and long-term quality improvement objectives. DESIGN: Qualitative exploratory design using an interpretivist approach with semi-structured interviews analysed thematically. Setting and participants. Interviews were conducted with 56 quality improvement managers from 15 (out of 20) New Zealand District Health Boards. Participants were divided into two groups: traditional and clinical quality improvement managers. The former group consisted of those with formal quality improvement education—typically operations managers or process engineers. The latter group was represented by clinical staff—physicians and nurses—who received on-the-job training. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: quality improvement expertise, leadership competencies and interpersonal competencies. Effective quality improvement managers require quality improvement experience and expertise in healthcare environments. They require leadership competencies including sense-giving, taking a long-term view and systems thinking. They also require interpersonal competencies including approachability, trustworthiness and supportiveness. Traditional and clinical quality improvement managers attributed different value to these characteristics with traditional quality improvement managers emphasising leadership competencies and interpersonal skills more than clinical quality improvement managers. CONCLUSIONS: We differentiate between traditional and clinical quality improvement managers, and suggest how both groups can be better prepared to be effective in their roles. Both groups require a comprehensive socialisation and training process designed to meet specific learning needs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07433-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8751312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87513122022-01-12 What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System Akmal, Adeel Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya Stokes, Tim Foote, Jeff Greatbanks, Richard Gauld, Robin BMC Health Serv Res Research PURPOSE: Quality improvement is an international priority, and health organisations invest heavily in this endeavour. Little, however, is known of the role and perspectives of Quality Improvement Managers who are responsible for quality improvement implementation. We explored the quality improvement managers’ accounts of what competencies and qualities they require to achieve day-to-day and long-term quality improvement objectives. DESIGN: Qualitative exploratory design using an interpretivist approach with semi-structured interviews analysed thematically. Setting and participants. Interviews were conducted with 56 quality improvement managers from 15 (out of 20) New Zealand District Health Boards. Participants were divided into two groups: traditional and clinical quality improvement managers. The former group consisted of those with formal quality improvement education—typically operations managers or process engineers. The latter group was represented by clinical staff—physicians and nurses—who received on-the-job training. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: quality improvement expertise, leadership competencies and interpersonal competencies. Effective quality improvement managers require quality improvement experience and expertise in healthcare environments. They require leadership competencies including sense-giving, taking a long-term view and systems thinking. They also require interpersonal competencies including approachability, trustworthiness and supportiveness. Traditional and clinical quality improvement managers attributed different value to these characteristics with traditional quality improvement managers emphasising leadership competencies and interpersonal skills more than clinical quality improvement managers. CONCLUSIONS: We differentiate between traditional and clinical quality improvement managers, and suggest how both groups can be better prepared to be effective in their roles. Both groups require a comprehensive socialisation and training process designed to meet specific learning needs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07433-w. BioMed Central 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8751312/ /pubmed/35012524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07433-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Akmal, Adeel Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya Stokes, Tim Foote, Jeff Greatbanks, Richard Gauld, Robin What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System |
title | What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System |
title_full | What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System |
title_fullStr | What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System |
title_full_unstemmed | What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System |
title_short | What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System |
title_sort | what makes an effective quality improvement manager? a qualitative study in the new zealand health system |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35012524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07433-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akmaladeel whatmakesaneffectivequalityimprovementmanageraqualitativestudyinthenewzealandhealthsystem AT podgorodnichenkonataliya whatmakesaneffectivequalityimprovementmanageraqualitativestudyinthenewzealandhealthsystem AT stokestim whatmakesaneffectivequalityimprovementmanageraqualitativestudyinthenewzealandhealthsystem AT footejeff whatmakesaneffectivequalityimprovementmanageraqualitativestudyinthenewzealandhealthsystem AT greatbanksrichard whatmakesaneffectivequalityimprovementmanageraqualitativestudyinthenewzealandhealthsystem AT gauldrobin whatmakesaneffectivequalityimprovementmanageraqualitativestudyinthenewzealandhealthsystem |