Cargando…

What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System

PURPOSE: Quality improvement is an international priority, and health organisations invest heavily in this endeavour. Little, however, is known of the role and perspectives of Quality Improvement Managers who are responsible for quality improvement implementation. We explored the quality improvement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akmal, Adeel, Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya, Stokes, Tim, Foote, Jeff, Greatbanks, Richard, Gauld, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35012524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07433-w
_version_ 1784631652529471488
author Akmal, Adeel
Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya
Stokes, Tim
Foote, Jeff
Greatbanks, Richard
Gauld, Robin
author_facet Akmal, Adeel
Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya
Stokes, Tim
Foote, Jeff
Greatbanks, Richard
Gauld, Robin
author_sort Akmal, Adeel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Quality improvement is an international priority, and health organisations invest heavily in this endeavour. Little, however, is known of the role and perspectives of Quality Improvement Managers who are responsible for quality improvement implementation. We explored the quality improvement managers’ accounts of what competencies and qualities they require to achieve day-to-day and long-term quality improvement objectives. DESIGN: Qualitative exploratory design using an interpretivist approach with semi-structured interviews analysed thematically. Setting and participants. Interviews were conducted with 56 quality improvement managers from 15 (out of 20) New Zealand District Health Boards. Participants were divided into two groups: traditional and clinical quality improvement managers. The former group consisted of those with formal quality improvement education—typically operations managers or process engineers. The latter group was represented by clinical staff—physicians and nurses—who received on-the-job training. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: quality improvement expertise, leadership competencies and interpersonal competencies. Effective quality improvement managers require quality improvement experience and expertise in healthcare environments. They require leadership competencies including sense-giving, taking a long-term view and systems thinking. They also require interpersonal competencies including approachability, trustworthiness and supportiveness. Traditional and clinical quality improvement managers attributed different value to these characteristics with traditional quality improvement managers emphasising leadership competencies and interpersonal skills more than clinical quality improvement managers. CONCLUSIONS: We differentiate between traditional and clinical quality improvement managers, and suggest how both groups can be better prepared to be effective in their roles. Both groups require a comprehensive socialisation and training process designed to meet specific learning needs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07433-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8751312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87513122022-01-12 What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System Akmal, Adeel Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya Stokes, Tim Foote, Jeff Greatbanks, Richard Gauld, Robin BMC Health Serv Res Research PURPOSE: Quality improvement is an international priority, and health organisations invest heavily in this endeavour. Little, however, is known of the role and perspectives of Quality Improvement Managers who are responsible for quality improvement implementation. We explored the quality improvement managers’ accounts of what competencies and qualities they require to achieve day-to-day and long-term quality improvement objectives. DESIGN: Qualitative exploratory design using an interpretivist approach with semi-structured interviews analysed thematically. Setting and participants. Interviews were conducted with 56 quality improvement managers from 15 (out of 20) New Zealand District Health Boards. Participants were divided into two groups: traditional and clinical quality improvement managers. The former group consisted of those with formal quality improvement education—typically operations managers or process engineers. The latter group was represented by clinical staff—physicians and nurses—who received on-the-job training. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: quality improvement expertise, leadership competencies and interpersonal competencies. Effective quality improvement managers require quality improvement experience and expertise in healthcare environments. They require leadership competencies including sense-giving, taking a long-term view and systems thinking. They also require interpersonal competencies including approachability, trustworthiness and supportiveness. Traditional and clinical quality improvement managers attributed different value to these characteristics with traditional quality improvement managers emphasising leadership competencies and interpersonal skills more than clinical quality improvement managers. CONCLUSIONS: We differentiate between traditional and clinical quality improvement managers, and suggest how both groups can be better prepared to be effective in their roles. Both groups require a comprehensive socialisation and training process designed to meet specific learning needs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07433-w. BioMed Central 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8751312/ /pubmed/35012524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07433-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Akmal, Adeel
Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya
Stokes, Tim
Foote, Jeff
Greatbanks, Richard
Gauld, Robin
What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System
title What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System
title_full What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System
title_fullStr What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System
title_full_unstemmed What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System
title_short What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System
title_sort what makes an effective quality improvement manager? a qualitative study in the new zealand health system
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35012524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07433-w
work_keys_str_mv AT akmaladeel whatmakesaneffectivequalityimprovementmanageraqualitativestudyinthenewzealandhealthsystem
AT podgorodnichenkonataliya whatmakesaneffectivequalityimprovementmanageraqualitativestudyinthenewzealandhealthsystem
AT stokestim whatmakesaneffectivequalityimprovementmanageraqualitativestudyinthenewzealandhealthsystem
AT footejeff whatmakesaneffectivequalityimprovementmanageraqualitativestudyinthenewzealandhealthsystem
AT greatbanksrichard whatmakesaneffectivequalityimprovementmanageraqualitativestudyinthenewzealandhealthsystem
AT gauldrobin whatmakesaneffectivequalityimprovementmanageraqualitativestudyinthenewzealandhealthsystem