Cargando…

Long-Term Clinicoradiological Outcomes of Cervical Fusion With Polyether Ether Ketone versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in a Double-Blinded Randomized Control Trial

INTRODUCTION: In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, we compare the long-term clinicoradiological effects of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyether ether ketone implant (ACDF with PEEK) versus artificial cervical disc (cervical disc arthroplasty [CDA]) in patients with s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Vijay Kumar, Basantani, Neeraj, Carvalho, Ajay Sebastian, Gupta, Ekata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071069
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_345_20
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, we compare the long-term clinicoradiological effects of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyether ether ketone implant (ACDF with PEEK) versus artificial cervical disc (cervical disc arthroplasty [CDA]) in patients with single and bilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). AIMS: We aimed to compare the pain scores, cervical kinematics, and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing CDA and ACDF for single and bilevel CDDD over 5 years. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This study was carried out from 2010 to 2019 in the Neurosurgery Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital attached to a Medical College in India. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 30 patients in each group. Clinical and radiological assessments were carried out for all patients over a period of 5 years. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Wilcoxon Signed-rank test, Mann–Whitney U-test, and Fischer's exact test were used for comparing the preoperative and follow-uP values. R software version 3.6.0 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A significant improvement in the cervical range of motion, sagittal range of motion (ROM), and functional spinal unit (FSU) was observed in the CDA group at final follow-up, while the PEEK group reported a significant decrease in the ROM and FSU and the difference between the two groups was also found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: When assessed over 5 years following surgery, we found CDA to be superior with respect to ROM, FSU, overall cervical alignment, and maintenance of disc height when compared to ACDF with PEEK implant.