Cargando…

Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary diseases have considerable prognostic relevance for all-cause mortality. Most patients with lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are treated by general practitioners. Understanding the clinical consequences such as pulmonary hyperinflation or reduced diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braun, Silke Doris, Clayton, Mareen, Koschel, Dirk, Prescher, Claudia, Körndle, Hermann, Narciss, Susanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Thoracic Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079740
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0035OC
_version_ 1784631728106635264
author Braun, Silke Doris
Clayton, Mareen
Koschel, Dirk
Prescher, Claudia
Körndle, Hermann
Narciss, Susanne
author_facet Braun, Silke Doris
Clayton, Mareen
Koschel, Dirk
Prescher, Claudia
Körndle, Hermann
Narciss, Susanne
author_sort Braun, Silke Doris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary diseases have considerable prognostic relevance for all-cause mortality. Most patients with lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are treated by general practitioners. Understanding the clinical consequences such as pulmonary hyperinflation or reduced diffusion capacity is important for the management and prognosis of patients with chronic respiratory disorders. Therefore, the interpretation of pulmonary function testing (PFT) results needs to see more emphasis in the medical education curriculum. OBJECTIVE: To develop PFT training for final-year medical students and to compare the efficacy of instructional training to self-reliant textbook study. METHODS: A two-armed randomized control trial compares learning outcomes in PFT interpretation. A total of 25 final-year medical students were selected at random into the 1) instructional training group or 2) self-reliant textbook study group on PFT interpretation. The learning time for both groups was 2 hours. The duration of the written pre- and post-training examinations was 60 minutes each. Both exams had a knowledge section (30 questions, maximum 120 points) and a skills section (11 case studies, maximum 75 points). RESULTS: The instructional training group acquired significantly more knowledge and, in particular, higher skill levels when compared with the self-reliant reading group. In the reading group, knowledge scores increased from 48 to 60% (12%) and skills scores increased from 14 to 22% (8%), whereas in the instructional group, knowledge increased from 47 to 71% (24%) and skills from 18 to 58% (40%). A multivariate analysis (Pillai’s Trace: 0.633; P < 0.001) as well as follow-up univariate analyses reveal that these differences are statistically significant (knowledge: F = 8.811, df = 1, P = 0.007; skills F = 33.965, df = 1, P < 0.001). Interestingly, there was no significant group effect in the pure knowledge gain about respiratory disorders per se. CONCLUSION: The self-reliant study group was less able to translate their newly acquired knowledge into interpretation of comprehensive PFT reports. A mandatory 2-hour instructional training greatly enhances the students’ knowledge and skills about PFT interpretation. Obligatory PFT instructional training should therefore be included in the students’ curriculum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8751683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Thoracic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87516832022-01-24 Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation Braun, Silke Doris Clayton, Mareen Koschel, Dirk Prescher, Claudia Körndle, Hermann Narciss, Susanne ATS Sch Original Research BACKGROUND: Pulmonary diseases have considerable prognostic relevance for all-cause mortality. Most patients with lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are treated by general practitioners. Understanding the clinical consequences such as pulmonary hyperinflation or reduced diffusion capacity is important for the management and prognosis of patients with chronic respiratory disorders. Therefore, the interpretation of pulmonary function testing (PFT) results needs to see more emphasis in the medical education curriculum. OBJECTIVE: To develop PFT training for final-year medical students and to compare the efficacy of instructional training to self-reliant textbook study. METHODS: A two-armed randomized control trial compares learning outcomes in PFT interpretation. A total of 25 final-year medical students were selected at random into the 1) instructional training group or 2) self-reliant textbook study group on PFT interpretation. The learning time for both groups was 2 hours. The duration of the written pre- and post-training examinations was 60 minutes each. Both exams had a knowledge section (30 questions, maximum 120 points) and a skills section (11 case studies, maximum 75 points). RESULTS: The instructional training group acquired significantly more knowledge and, in particular, higher skill levels when compared with the self-reliant reading group. In the reading group, knowledge scores increased from 48 to 60% (12%) and skills scores increased from 14 to 22% (8%), whereas in the instructional group, knowledge increased from 47 to 71% (24%) and skills from 18 to 58% (40%). A multivariate analysis (Pillai’s Trace: 0.633; P < 0.001) as well as follow-up univariate analyses reveal that these differences are statistically significant (knowledge: F = 8.811, df = 1, P = 0.007; skills F = 33.965, df = 1, P < 0.001). Interestingly, there was no significant group effect in the pure knowledge gain about respiratory disorders per se. CONCLUSION: The self-reliant study group was less able to translate their newly acquired knowledge into interpretation of comprehensive PFT reports. A mandatory 2-hour instructional training greatly enhances the students’ knowledge and skills about PFT interpretation. Obligatory PFT instructional training should therefore be included in the students’ curriculum. American Thoracic Society 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8751683/ /pubmed/35079740 http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0035OC Text en Copyright © 2021 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern.
spellingShingle Original Research
Braun, Silke Doris
Clayton, Mareen
Koschel, Dirk
Prescher, Claudia
Körndle, Hermann
Narciss, Susanne
Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation
title Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation
title_full Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation
title_fullStr Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation
title_full_unstemmed Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation
title_short Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation
title_sort instructional training compared with self-study for pulmonary function test interpretation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079740
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0035OC
work_keys_str_mv AT braunsilkedoris instructionaltrainingcomparedwithselfstudyforpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation
AT claytonmareen instructionaltrainingcomparedwithselfstudyforpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation
AT koscheldirk instructionaltrainingcomparedwithselfstudyforpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation
AT prescherclaudia instructionaltrainingcomparedwithselfstudyforpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation
AT korndlehermann instructionaltrainingcomparedwithselfstudyforpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation
AT narcisssusanne instructionaltrainingcomparedwithselfstudyforpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation