Cargando…
Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary diseases have considerable prognostic relevance for all-cause mortality. Most patients with lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are treated by general practitioners. Understanding the clinical consequences such as pulmonary hyperinflation or reduced diff...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Thoracic Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079740 http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0035OC |
_version_ | 1784631728106635264 |
---|---|
author | Braun, Silke Doris Clayton, Mareen Koschel, Dirk Prescher, Claudia Körndle, Hermann Narciss, Susanne |
author_facet | Braun, Silke Doris Clayton, Mareen Koschel, Dirk Prescher, Claudia Körndle, Hermann Narciss, Susanne |
author_sort | Braun, Silke Doris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pulmonary diseases have considerable prognostic relevance for all-cause mortality. Most patients with lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are treated by general practitioners. Understanding the clinical consequences such as pulmonary hyperinflation or reduced diffusion capacity is important for the management and prognosis of patients with chronic respiratory disorders. Therefore, the interpretation of pulmonary function testing (PFT) results needs to see more emphasis in the medical education curriculum. OBJECTIVE: To develop PFT training for final-year medical students and to compare the efficacy of instructional training to self-reliant textbook study. METHODS: A two-armed randomized control trial compares learning outcomes in PFT interpretation. A total of 25 final-year medical students were selected at random into the 1) instructional training group or 2) self-reliant textbook study group on PFT interpretation. The learning time for both groups was 2 hours. The duration of the written pre- and post-training examinations was 60 minutes each. Both exams had a knowledge section (30 questions, maximum 120 points) and a skills section (11 case studies, maximum 75 points). RESULTS: The instructional training group acquired significantly more knowledge and, in particular, higher skill levels when compared with the self-reliant reading group. In the reading group, knowledge scores increased from 48 to 60% (12%) and skills scores increased from 14 to 22% (8%), whereas in the instructional group, knowledge increased from 47 to 71% (24%) and skills from 18 to 58% (40%). A multivariate analysis (Pillai’s Trace: 0.633; P < 0.001) as well as follow-up univariate analyses reveal that these differences are statistically significant (knowledge: F = 8.811, df = 1, P = 0.007; skills F = 33.965, df = 1, P < 0.001). Interestingly, there was no significant group effect in the pure knowledge gain about respiratory disorders per se. CONCLUSION: The self-reliant study group was less able to translate their newly acquired knowledge into interpretation of comprehensive PFT reports. A mandatory 2-hour instructional training greatly enhances the students’ knowledge and skills about PFT interpretation. Obligatory PFT instructional training should therefore be included in the students’ curriculum. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8751683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Thoracic Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87516832022-01-24 Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation Braun, Silke Doris Clayton, Mareen Koschel, Dirk Prescher, Claudia Körndle, Hermann Narciss, Susanne ATS Sch Original Research BACKGROUND: Pulmonary diseases have considerable prognostic relevance for all-cause mortality. Most patients with lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are treated by general practitioners. Understanding the clinical consequences such as pulmonary hyperinflation or reduced diffusion capacity is important for the management and prognosis of patients with chronic respiratory disorders. Therefore, the interpretation of pulmonary function testing (PFT) results needs to see more emphasis in the medical education curriculum. OBJECTIVE: To develop PFT training for final-year medical students and to compare the efficacy of instructional training to self-reliant textbook study. METHODS: A two-armed randomized control trial compares learning outcomes in PFT interpretation. A total of 25 final-year medical students were selected at random into the 1) instructional training group or 2) self-reliant textbook study group on PFT interpretation. The learning time for both groups was 2 hours. The duration of the written pre- and post-training examinations was 60 minutes each. Both exams had a knowledge section (30 questions, maximum 120 points) and a skills section (11 case studies, maximum 75 points). RESULTS: The instructional training group acquired significantly more knowledge and, in particular, higher skill levels when compared with the self-reliant reading group. In the reading group, knowledge scores increased from 48 to 60% (12%) and skills scores increased from 14 to 22% (8%), whereas in the instructional group, knowledge increased from 47 to 71% (24%) and skills from 18 to 58% (40%). A multivariate analysis (Pillai’s Trace: 0.633; P < 0.001) as well as follow-up univariate analyses reveal that these differences are statistically significant (knowledge: F = 8.811, df = 1, P = 0.007; skills F = 33.965, df = 1, P < 0.001). Interestingly, there was no significant group effect in the pure knowledge gain about respiratory disorders per se. CONCLUSION: The self-reliant study group was less able to translate their newly acquired knowledge into interpretation of comprehensive PFT reports. A mandatory 2-hour instructional training greatly enhances the students’ knowledge and skills about PFT interpretation. Obligatory PFT instructional training should therefore be included in the students’ curriculum. American Thoracic Society 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8751683/ /pubmed/35079740 http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0035OC Text en Copyright © 2021 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Braun, Silke Doris Clayton, Mareen Koschel, Dirk Prescher, Claudia Körndle, Hermann Narciss, Susanne Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation |
title | Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation |
title_full | Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation |
title_fullStr | Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation |
title_full_unstemmed | Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation |
title_short | Instructional Training Compared with Self-Study for Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation |
title_sort | instructional training compared with self-study for pulmonary function test interpretation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079740 http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0035OC |
work_keys_str_mv | AT braunsilkedoris instructionaltrainingcomparedwithselfstudyforpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT claytonmareen instructionaltrainingcomparedwithselfstudyforpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT koscheldirk instructionaltrainingcomparedwithselfstudyforpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT prescherclaudia instructionaltrainingcomparedwithselfstudyforpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT korndlehermann instructionaltrainingcomparedwithselfstudyforpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT narcisssusanne instructionaltrainingcomparedwithselfstudyforpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation |