Cargando…

An Investigator-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Effectiveness, Safety of Levocetirizine and Bepotastine in Chronic Urticaria

INTRODUCTION: Chronic urticaria is common and distressing dermatosis where the search for newer agents with improved effectiveness and tolerability profile is a felt need. Bepotastine, a second-generation antihistamine, with added effect on suppression of eosinophil migration has a prospect in the m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sil, Amrita, Rahaman, Sufiur, Mondal, Nasiruddin, Ahmed, Sk Shahriar, Tarafdar, Dhiman, Patra, Aparesh Chandra, Roy, Sudipta, Das, Nilay Kanti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35068500
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_813_20
_version_ 1784631731554353152
author Sil, Amrita
Rahaman, Sufiur
Mondal, Nasiruddin
Ahmed, Sk Shahriar
Tarafdar, Dhiman
Patra, Aparesh Chandra
Roy, Sudipta
Das, Nilay Kanti
author_facet Sil, Amrita
Rahaman, Sufiur
Mondal, Nasiruddin
Ahmed, Sk Shahriar
Tarafdar, Dhiman
Patra, Aparesh Chandra
Roy, Sudipta
Das, Nilay Kanti
author_sort Sil, Amrita
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chronic urticaria is common and distressing dermatosis where the search for newer agents with improved effectiveness and tolerability profile is a felt need. Bepotastine, a second-generation antihistamine, with added effect on suppression of eosinophil migration has a prospect in the management of chronic urticaria. AIMS: To assess and compare effectiveness and safety of bepotastine versus levocetirizine in chronic urticaria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center, investigator-blind, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group phase IV trial (CTRI REF/2018/04/019692) conducted on adult patients of chronic urticaria of either sex. Patients were randomized into receiving either bepotastine besilate 10 mg tablet twice daily or levocetirizine 5 mg tablet once daily with fortnightly follow-up for 6 follow-up visits after thebaseline evaluation. The primary outcome measures were Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) and Urticaria Total Severity Score (TSS). Routine hematological, biochemical tests, treatment-emergent adverse events were monitored for safety. RESULTS: Thirty patients in the bepotastine group and 29 patients in the levocetirizine group were analyzed by modified-intention-to-treat criteria. The study groups were comparable at the baseline with respect to the severity of chronic urticaria. UAS7 and TSS reduced significantly (P < 0.001, Friedman's ANOVA) in both treatment groups from 1(st) follow-up visit and 2(nd) follow-up visits (P < 0.05, Post Hoc Dunn's test) At the test-of-cure visit, UAS7 (5.13 ± 8.21 vs 7.48 ± 8.96) and TSS (5.10 ± 4.06 vs 7.07 ± 4.48) were less with bepotastine than levocetirizine although not statistically significant (P = 0.188 and 0.073, respectively, Mann–Whitney U test). Sedation during daytime was found to be significantly more (P < 0.001, Fischer's exact test) with levocetirizine than bepotastine (73.3% vs 17.2%). CONCLUSION: Bepotastine is comparable to levocetirizine with respect to its effectiveness with an edge in terms of side-effect (sedation during day time); thus, it offers a new therapeutic option in chronic urticaria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8751697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87516972022-01-21 An Investigator-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Effectiveness, Safety of Levocetirizine and Bepotastine in Chronic Urticaria Sil, Amrita Rahaman, Sufiur Mondal, Nasiruddin Ahmed, Sk Shahriar Tarafdar, Dhiman Patra, Aparesh Chandra Roy, Sudipta Das, Nilay Kanti Indian J Dermatol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Chronic urticaria is common and distressing dermatosis where the search for newer agents with improved effectiveness and tolerability profile is a felt need. Bepotastine, a second-generation antihistamine, with added effect on suppression of eosinophil migration has a prospect in the management of chronic urticaria. AIMS: To assess and compare effectiveness and safety of bepotastine versus levocetirizine in chronic urticaria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center, investigator-blind, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group phase IV trial (CTRI REF/2018/04/019692) conducted on adult patients of chronic urticaria of either sex. Patients were randomized into receiving either bepotastine besilate 10 mg tablet twice daily or levocetirizine 5 mg tablet once daily with fortnightly follow-up for 6 follow-up visits after thebaseline evaluation. The primary outcome measures were Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) and Urticaria Total Severity Score (TSS). Routine hematological, biochemical tests, treatment-emergent adverse events were monitored for safety. RESULTS: Thirty patients in the bepotastine group and 29 patients in the levocetirizine group were analyzed by modified-intention-to-treat criteria. The study groups were comparable at the baseline with respect to the severity of chronic urticaria. UAS7 and TSS reduced significantly (P < 0.001, Friedman's ANOVA) in both treatment groups from 1(st) follow-up visit and 2(nd) follow-up visits (P < 0.05, Post Hoc Dunn's test) At the test-of-cure visit, UAS7 (5.13 ± 8.21 vs 7.48 ± 8.96) and TSS (5.10 ± 4.06 vs 7.07 ± 4.48) were less with bepotastine than levocetirizine although not statistically significant (P = 0.188 and 0.073, respectively, Mann–Whitney U test). Sedation during daytime was found to be significantly more (P < 0.001, Fischer's exact test) with levocetirizine than bepotastine (73.3% vs 17.2%). CONCLUSION: Bepotastine is comparable to levocetirizine with respect to its effectiveness with an edge in terms of side-effect (sedation during day time); thus, it offers a new therapeutic option in chronic urticaria. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8751697/ /pubmed/35068500 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_813_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Dermatology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sil, Amrita
Rahaman, Sufiur
Mondal, Nasiruddin
Ahmed, Sk Shahriar
Tarafdar, Dhiman
Patra, Aparesh Chandra
Roy, Sudipta
Das, Nilay Kanti
An Investigator-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Effectiveness, Safety of Levocetirizine and Bepotastine in Chronic Urticaria
title An Investigator-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Effectiveness, Safety of Levocetirizine and Bepotastine in Chronic Urticaria
title_full An Investigator-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Effectiveness, Safety of Levocetirizine and Bepotastine in Chronic Urticaria
title_fullStr An Investigator-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Effectiveness, Safety of Levocetirizine and Bepotastine in Chronic Urticaria
title_full_unstemmed An Investigator-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Effectiveness, Safety of Levocetirizine and Bepotastine in Chronic Urticaria
title_short An Investigator-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Effectiveness, Safety of Levocetirizine and Bepotastine in Chronic Urticaria
title_sort investigator-blind randomized controlled trial comparing effectiveness, safety of levocetirizine and bepotastine in chronic urticaria
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35068500
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_813_20
work_keys_str_mv AT silamrita aninvestigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT rahamansufiur aninvestigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT mondalnasiruddin aninvestigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT ahmedskshahriar aninvestigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT tarafdardhiman aninvestigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT patraapareshchandra aninvestigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT roysudipta aninvestigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT dasnilaykanti aninvestigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT silamrita investigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT rahamansufiur investigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT mondalnasiruddin investigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT ahmedskshahriar investigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT tarafdardhiman investigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT patraapareshchandra investigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT roysudipta investigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria
AT dasnilaykanti investigatorblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingeffectivenesssafetyoflevocetirizineandbepotastineinchronicurticaria