Cargando…

Effectiveness of Skin Graft in the Chest for Postburn Cervical Contractures

Skin grafts (SGs) offer a simple and reliable means of correcting postburn cervical contractures. However, their use has a high risk of contracture recurrence, as proper postoperative care is often difficult to perform. Splinting and pressure therapy are challenging in the neck, which has complex mu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maitani, Kosuke, Tomita, Koichi, Taminato, Mifue, Kubo, Tateki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003929
_version_ 1784631748301160448
author Maitani, Kosuke
Tomita, Koichi
Taminato, Mifue
Kubo, Tateki
author_facet Maitani, Kosuke
Tomita, Koichi
Taminato, Mifue
Kubo, Tateki
author_sort Maitani, Kosuke
collection PubMed
description Skin grafts (SGs) offer a simple and reliable means of correcting postburn cervical contractures. However, their use has a high risk of contracture recurrence, as proper postoperative care is often difficult to perform. Splinting and pressure therapy are challenging in the neck, which has complex multidirectional mobility and contains critical structures. In contrast, the upper chest area, which also contributes to neck extension, has a relatively plane surface and rigid subcutaneous tissue, and is likely to be a more reliable site for pressure application. Here we report a case with good restoration of neck extension after using a split-thickness SG (STSG) only in the upper chest. A 22-year-old man with third-degree burns survived with the use of multiple SGs. Nine years later, he lacked a healthy donor site for a full-thickness SG or flap surgery. Although a split-thickness SG on the neck was performed for restricted cervical extension, severe contracture of the skin graft developed due to failure to continue postoperative pressure therapy. As a last resort, further surgery with a split-thickness SG was performed in the upper chest after releasing the contracture. With continued, successful postoperative pressure therapy, contracture of the skin graft was minimized. According to our survey of healthy volunteers, chest skin mobilization contributes to about 30% of cervical extension. This suggests that SG use in the chest is a reasonable option to reliability and effectively address restricted neck motility due to postburn contracture when a healthy donor site for a full-thickness SG or flap surgery is unavailable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8751771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87517712022-01-12 Effectiveness of Skin Graft in the Chest for Postburn Cervical Contractures Maitani, Kosuke Tomita, Koichi Taminato, Mifue Kubo, Tateki Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Reconstructive Skin grafts (SGs) offer a simple and reliable means of correcting postburn cervical contractures. However, their use has a high risk of contracture recurrence, as proper postoperative care is often difficult to perform. Splinting and pressure therapy are challenging in the neck, which has complex multidirectional mobility and contains critical structures. In contrast, the upper chest area, which also contributes to neck extension, has a relatively plane surface and rigid subcutaneous tissue, and is likely to be a more reliable site for pressure application. Here we report a case with good restoration of neck extension after using a split-thickness SG (STSG) only in the upper chest. A 22-year-old man with third-degree burns survived with the use of multiple SGs. Nine years later, he lacked a healthy donor site for a full-thickness SG or flap surgery. Although a split-thickness SG on the neck was performed for restricted cervical extension, severe contracture of the skin graft developed due to failure to continue postoperative pressure therapy. As a last resort, further surgery with a split-thickness SG was performed in the upper chest after releasing the contracture. With continued, successful postoperative pressure therapy, contracture of the skin graft was minimized. According to our survey of healthy volunteers, chest skin mobilization contributes to about 30% of cervical extension. This suggests that SG use in the chest is a reasonable option to reliability and effectively address restricted neck motility due to postburn contracture when a healthy donor site for a full-thickness SG or flap surgery is unavailable. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8751771/ /pubmed/35028260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003929 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Reconstructive
Maitani, Kosuke
Tomita, Koichi
Taminato, Mifue
Kubo, Tateki
Effectiveness of Skin Graft in the Chest for Postburn Cervical Contractures
title Effectiveness of Skin Graft in the Chest for Postburn Cervical Contractures
title_full Effectiveness of Skin Graft in the Chest for Postburn Cervical Contractures
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Skin Graft in the Chest for Postburn Cervical Contractures
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Skin Graft in the Chest for Postburn Cervical Contractures
title_short Effectiveness of Skin Graft in the Chest for Postburn Cervical Contractures
title_sort effectiveness of skin graft in the chest for postburn cervical contractures
topic Reconstructive
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003929
work_keys_str_mv AT maitanikosuke effectivenessofskingraftinthechestforpostburncervicalcontractures
AT tomitakoichi effectivenessofskingraftinthechestforpostburncervicalcontractures
AT taminatomifue effectivenessofskingraftinthechestforpostburncervicalcontractures
AT kubotateki effectivenessofskingraftinthechestforpostburncervicalcontractures