Cargando…

Comparison of Long‐Term Outcomes for Responders Versus Non‐Responders Following Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension

BACKGROUND: Recent trial results support the efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation in lowering blood pressure (BP). While BP reduction in general is associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in cardiovascular events and mortality, such a relationship has not been described for patients u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fengler, Karl, Reimann, Paul, Rommel, Karl‐Philipp, Kresoja, Karl‐Patrik, Blazek, Stephan, Unterhuber, Matthias, Besler, Christian, von Roeder, Maximilian, Böhm, Michael, Desch, Steffen, Thiele, Holger, Lurz, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34713718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022429
_version_ 1784631759840739328
author Fengler, Karl
Reimann, Paul
Rommel, Karl‐Philipp
Kresoja, Karl‐Patrik
Blazek, Stephan
Unterhuber, Matthias
Besler, Christian
von Roeder, Maximilian
Böhm, Michael
Desch, Steffen
Thiele, Holger
Lurz, Philipp
author_facet Fengler, Karl
Reimann, Paul
Rommel, Karl‐Philipp
Kresoja, Karl‐Patrik
Blazek, Stephan
Unterhuber, Matthias
Besler, Christian
von Roeder, Maximilian
Böhm, Michael
Desch, Steffen
Thiele, Holger
Lurz, Philipp
author_sort Fengler, Karl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent trial results support the efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation in lowering blood pressure (BP). While BP reduction in general is associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in cardiovascular events and mortality, such a relationship has not been described for patients undergoing renal sympathetic denervation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical events were assessed in patients who underwent renal sympathetic denervation at our center using telephone‐ and clinical follow‐up, interviews with general practitioners, as well as review of hospital databases. Event rates were compared between BP responders (≥5 mm Hg 24‐hour ambulatory BP reduction) and non‐responders; 296 patients were included. Compared with baseline, 24‐hour systolic ambulatory BP was reduced by 8.3±12.2 mm Hg and diastolic BP by 4.8±7.0 mm Hg (P<0.001 for both) after 3 months. One hundred eighty patients were classified as BP responders and 116 as non‐responders. During a median follow‐up time of 48 months, significantly less major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, critical limb ischemia, renal failure) occurred in responders than in non‐responders (22 versus 23 events, hazard ratio [HR], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.97], P=0.041). This was consistent after adjustment for potential confounders as well as confirmed by propensity‐score matching. A proportional relationship was found between BP reduction after 3 months and frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97] per 10 mm Hg 24‐hour systolic ambulatory BP reduction). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these observational data, blood pressure response to renal sympathetic denervation is associated with improved long‐term clinical outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8751833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87518332022-01-14 Comparison of Long‐Term Outcomes for Responders Versus Non‐Responders Following Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension Fengler, Karl Reimann, Paul Rommel, Karl‐Philipp Kresoja, Karl‐Patrik Blazek, Stephan Unterhuber, Matthias Besler, Christian von Roeder, Maximilian Böhm, Michael Desch, Steffen Thiele, Holger Lurz, Philipp J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Recent trial results support the efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation in lowering blood pressure (BP). While BP reduction in general is associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in cardiovascular events and mortality, such a relationship has not been described for patients undergoing renal sympathetic denervation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical events were assessed in patients who underwent renal sympathetic denervation at our center using telephone‐ and clinical follow‐up, interviews with general practitioners, as well as review of hospital databases. Event rates were compared between BP responders (≥5 mm Hg 24‐hour ambulatory BP reduction) and non‐responders; 296 patients were included. Compared with baseline, 24‐hour systolic ambulatory BP was reduced by 8.3±12.2 mm Hg and diastolic BP by 4.8±7.0 mm Hg (P<0.001 for both) after 3 months. One hundred eighty patients were classified as BP responders and 116 as non‐responders. During a median follow‐up time of 48 months, significantly less major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, critical limb ischemia, renal failure) occurred in responders than in non‐responders (22 versus 23 events, hazard ratio [HR], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.97], P=0.041). This was consistent after adjustment for potential confounders as well as confirmed by propensity‐score matching. A proportional relationship was found between BP reduction after 3 months and frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97] per 10 mm Hg 24‐hour systolic ambulatory BP reduction). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these observational data, blood pressure response to renal sympathetic denervation is associated with improved long‐term clinical outcome. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8751833/ /pubmed/34713718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022429 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Fengler, Karl
Reimann, Paul
Rommel, Karl‐Philipp
Kresoja, Karl‐Patrik
Blazek, Stephan
Unterhuber, Matthias
Besler, Christian
von Roeder, Maximilian
Böhm, Michael
Desch, Steffen
Thiele, Holger
Lurz, Philipp
Comparison of Long‐Term Outcomes for Responders Versus Non‐Responders Following Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension
title Comparison of Long‐Term Outcomes for Responders Versus Non‐Responders Following Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension
title_full Comparison of Long‐Term Outcomes for Responders Versus Non‐Responders Following Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension
title_fullStr Comparison of Long‐Term Outcomes for Responders Versus Non‐Responders Following Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Long‐Term Outcomes for Responders Versus Non‐Responders Following Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension
title_short Comparison of Long‐Term Outcomes for Responders Versus Non‐Responders Following Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension
title_sort comparison of long‐term outcomes for responders versus non‐responders following renal denervation in resistant hypertension
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34713718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022429
work_keys_str_mv AT fenglerkarl comparisonoflongtermoutcomesforrespondersversusnonrespondersfollowingrenaldenervationinresistanthypertension
AT reimannpaul comparisonoflongtermoutcomesforrespondersversusnonrespondersfollowingrenaldenervationinresistanthypertension
AT rommelkarlphilipp comparisonoflongtermoutcomesforrespondersversusnonrespondersfollowingrenaldenervationinresistanthypertension
AT kresojakarlpatrik comparisonoflongtermoutcomesforrespondersversusnonrespondersfollowingrenaldenervationinresistanthypertension
AT blazekstephan comparisonoflongtermoutcomesforrespondersversusnonrespondersfollowingrenaldenervationinresistanthypertension
AT unterhubermatthias comparisonoflongtermoutcomesforrespondersversusnonrespondersfollowingrenaldenervationinresistanthypertension
AT beslerchristian comparisonoflongtermoutcomesforrespondersversusnonrespondersfollowingrenaldenervationinresistanthypertension
AT vonroedermaximilian comparisonoflongtermoutcomesforrespondersversusnonrespondersfollowingrenaldenervationinresistanthypertension
AT bohmmichael comparisonoflongtermoutcomesforrespondersversusnonrespondersfollowingrenaldenervationinresistanthypertension
AT deschsteffen comparisonoflongtermoutcomesforrespondersversusnonrespondersfollowingrenaldenervationinresistanthypertension
AT thieleholger comparisonoflongtermoutcomesforrespondersversusnonrespondersfollowingrenaldenervationinresistanthypertension
AT lurzphilipp comparisonoflongtermoutcomesforrespondersversusnonrespondersfollowingrenaldenervationinresistanthypertension