Cargando…
Phase-Synchronized Stimulus Presentation Augments Contingency Knowledge and Affective Evaluation in a Fear-Conditioning Task
Memory often combines information from different sensory modalities. Animal studies show that synchronized neuronal activity in the theta band (4–8 Hz) binds multimodal associations. Studies with human participants have likewise established that theta-phase synchronization augments the formation of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Neuroscience
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34857589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0538-20.2021 |
_version_ | 1784631764594982912 |
---|---|
author | Plog, Elena Antov, Martin I. Bierwirth, Philipp Keil, Andreas Stockhorst, Ursula |
author_facet | Plog, Elena Antov, Martin I. Bierwirth, Philipp Keil, Andreas Stockhorst, Ursula |
author_sort | Plog, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Memory often combines information from different sensory modalities. Animal studies show that synchronized neuronal activity in the theta band (4–8 Hz) binds multimodal associations. Studies with human participants have likewise established that theta-phase synchronization augments the formation of declarative video–tone pair memories. Another form of associative learning, classical fear conditioning, models nondeclarative, emotional memory with distinct neuronal mechanisms. Typical fear-conditioning tasks pair a conditioned stimulus (CS) in one modality with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) in another. The present study examines the effects of CS–US synchronization in the theta band on fear memory formation in humans. In a fear generalization procedure, we paired one of five visual gratings of varying orientation (CS) with an aversive auditory US. We modulated the luminance of the CS and the volume of the US at a rate of 4 Hz. To manipulate the synchrony between visual and auditory input during fear acquisition, one group (N = 20) received synchronous CS–US pairing, whereas the control group (N = 20) received the CS–US pairs out of phase. Phase synchronization improved CS–US contingency knowledge and facilitated CS discrimination in terms of rated valence and arousal, resulting in narrower generalization across the CS gratings compared with the out-of-phase group. In contrast, synchronization did not amplify conditioned responding in physiological arousal (skin conductance) and visuocortical engagement (steady-state visually evoked potentials) during acquisition, although both measures demonstrated tuning toward the CS(+). Together, these data support a causal role of theta-phase synchronization in affective evaluation and contingency report during fear acquisition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8751852 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87518522022-01-12 Phase-Synchronized Stimulus Presentation Augments Contingency Knowledge and Affective Evaluation in a Fear-Conditioning Task Plog, Elena Antov, Martin I. Bierwirth, Philipp Keil, Andreas Stockhorst, Ursula eNeuro Research Article: New Research Memory often combines information from different sensory modalities. Animal studies show that synchronized neuronal activity in the theta band (4–8 Hz) binds multimodal associations. Studies with human participants have likewise established that theta-phase synchronization augments the formation of declarative video–tone pair memories. Another form of associative learning, classical fear conditioning, models nondeclarative, emotional memory with distinct neuronal mechanisms. Typical fear-conditioning tasks pair a conditioned stimulus (CS) in one modality with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) in another. The present study examines the effects of CS–US synchronization in the theta band on fear memory formation in humans. In a fear generalization procedure, we paired one of five visual gratings of varying orientation (CS) with an aversive auditory US. We modulated the luminance of the CS and the volume of the US at a rate of 4 Hz. To manipulate the synchrony between visual and auditory input during fear acquisition, one group (N = 20) received synchronous CS–US pairing, whereas the control group (N = 20) received the CS–US pairs out of phase. Phase synchronization improved CS–US contingency knowledge and facilitated CS discrimination in terms of rated valence and arousal, resulting in narrower generalization across the CS gratings compared with the out-of-phase group. In contrast, synchronization did not amplify conditioned responding in physiological arousal (skin conductance) and visuocortical engagement (steady-state visually evoked potentials) during acquisition, although both measures demonstrated tuning toward the CS(+). Together, these data support a causal role of theta-phase synchronization in affective evaluation and contingency report during fear acquisition. Society for Neuroscience 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8751852/ /pubmed/34857589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0538-20.2021 Text en Copyright © 2022 Plog et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Research Article: New Research Plog, Elena Antov, Martin I. Bierwirth, Philipp Keil, Andreas Stockhorst, Ursula Phase-Synchronized Stimulus Presentation Augments Contingency Knowledge and Affective Evaluation in a Fear-Conditioning Task |
title | Phase-Synchronized Stimulus Presentation Augments Contingency Knowledge and Affective Evaluation in a Fear-Conditioning Task |
title_full | Phase-Synchronized Stimulus Presentation Augments Contingency Knowledge and Affective Evaluation in a Fear-Conditioning Task |
title_fullStr | Phase-Synchronized Stimulus Presentation Augments Contingency Knowledge and Affective Evaluation in a Fear-Conditioning Task |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase-Synchronized Stimulus Presentation Augments Contingency Knowledge and Affective Evaluation in a Fear-Conditioning Task |
title_short | Phase-Synchronized Stimulus Presentation Augments Contingency Knowledge and Affective Evaluation in a Fear-Conditioning Task |
title_sort | phase-synchronized stimulus presentation augments contingency knowledge and affective evaluation in a fear-conditioning task |
topic | Research Article: New Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34857589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0538-20.2021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT plogelena phasesynchronizedstimuluspresentationaugmentscontingencyknowledgeandaffectiveevaluationinafearconditioningtask AT antovmartini phasesynchronizedstimuluspresentationaugmentscontingencyknowledgeandaffectiveevaluationinafearconditioningtask AT bierwirthphilipp phasesynchronizedstimuluspresentationaugmentscontingencyknowledgeandaffectiveevaluationinafearconditioningtask AT keilandreas phasesynchronizedstimuluspresentationaugmentscontingencyknowledgeandaffectiveevaluationinafearconditioningtask AT stockhorstursula phasesynchronizedstimuluspresentationaugmentscontingencyknowledgeandaffectiveevaluationinafearconditioningtask |