Cargando…

Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Resource utilization among emergency department (ED) patients with possible coronary chest pain is highly variable. METHODS AND RESULTS: Controlled cohort study amongst 21 EDs of an integrated healthcare system examining the implementation of a graded coronary risk stratification algorit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mark, Dustin G., Huang, Jie, Ballard, Dustin W., Kene, Mamata V., Sax, Dana R., Chettipally, Uli K., Lin, James S., Bouvet, Sean C., Cotton, Dale M., Anderson, Megan L., McLachlan, Ian D., Simon, Laura E., Shan, Judy, Rauchwerger, Adina S., Vinson, David R., Reed, Mary E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34743565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022539
_version_ 1784631782979665920
author Mark, Dustin G.
Huang, Jie
Ballard, Dustin W.
Kene, Mamata V.
Sax, Dana R.
Chettipally, Uli K.
Lin, James S.
Bouvet, Sean C.
Cotton, Dale M.
Anderson, Megan L.
McLachlan, Ian D.
Simon, Laura E.
Shan, Judy
Rauchwerger, Adina S.
Vinson, David R.
Reed, Mary E.
author_facet Mark, Dustin G.
Huang, Jie
Ballard, Dustin W.
Kene, Mamata V.
Sax, Dana R.
Chettipally, Uli K.
Lin, James S.
Bouvet, Sean C.
Cotton, Dale M.
Anderson, Megan L.
McLachlan, Ian D.
Simon, Laura E.
Shan, Judy
Rauchwerger, Adina S.
Vinson, David R.
Reed, Mary E.
author_sort Mark, Dustin G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Resource utilization among emergency department (ED) patients with possible coronary chest pain is highly variable. METHODS AND RESULTS: Controlled cohort study amongst 21 EDs of an integrated healthcare system examining the implementation of a graded coronary risk stratification algorithm (RISTRA‐ACS [risk stratification for acute coronary syndrome]). Thirteen EDs had access to RISTRA‐ACS within the electronic health record (RISTRA sites) beginning in month 24 of a 48‐month study period (January 2016 to December 2019); the remaining 8 EDs served as contemporaneous controls. Study participants had a chief complaint of chest pain and serum troponin measurement in the ED. The primary outcome was index visit resource utilization (observation unit or hospital admission, or 7‐day objective cardiac testing). Secondary outcomes were 30‐day objective cardiac testing, 60‐day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and 60‐day MACE‐CR (MACE excluding coronary revascularization). Difference‐in‐differences analyses controlled for secular trends with stratification by estimated risk and adjustment for risk factors, ED physician and facility. A total of 154 914 encounters were included. Relative to control sites, 30‐day objective cardiac testing decreased at RISTRA sites among patients with low (≤2%) estimated 60‐day MACE risk (−2.5%, 95% CI −3.7 to −1.2%, P<0.001) and increased among patients with non‐low (>2%) estimated risk (+2.8%, 95% CI +0.6 to +4.9%, P=0.014), without significant overall change (−1.0%, 95% CI −2.1 to 0.1%, P=0.079). There were no statistically significant differences in index visit resource utilization, 60‐day MACE or 60‐day MACE‐CR. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of RISTRA‐ACS was associated with better allocation of 30‐day objective cardiac testing and no change in index visit resource utilization or 60‐day MACE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03286179.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8751925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87519252022-01-14 Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study Mark, Dustin G. Huang, Jie Ballard, Dustin W. Kene, Mamata V. Sax, Dana R. Chettipally, Uli K. Lin, James S. Bouvet, Sean C. Cotton, Dale M. Anderson, Megan L. McLachlan, Ian D. Simon, Laura E. Shan, Judy Rauchwerger, Adina S. Vinson, David R. Reed, Mary E. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Resource utilization among emergency department (ED) patients with possible coronary chest pain is highly variable. METHODS AND RESULTS: Controlled cohort study amongst 21 EDs of an integrated healthcare system examining the implementation of a graded coronary risk stratification algorithm (RISTRA‐ACS [risk stratification for acute coronary syndrome]). Thirteen EDs had access to RISTRA‐ACS within the electronic health record (RISTRA sites) beginning in month 24 of a 48‐month study period (January 2016 to December 2019); the remaining 8 EDs served as contemporaneous controls. Study participants had a chief complaint of chest pain and serum troponin measurement in the ED. The primary outcome was index visit resource utilization (observation unit or hospital admission, or 7‐day objective cardiac testing). Secondary outcomes were 30‐day objective cardiac testing, 60‐day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and 60‐day MACE‐CR (MACE excluding coronary revascularization). Difference‐in‐differences analyses controlled for secular trends with stratification by estimated risk and adjustment for risk factors, ED physician and facility. A total of 154 914 encounters were included. Relative to control sites, 30‐day objective cardiac testing decreased at RISTRA sites among patients with low (≤2%) estimated 60‐day MACE risk (−2.5%, 95% CI −3.7 to −1.2%, P<0.001) and increased among patients with non‐low (>2%) estimated risk (+2.8%, 95% CI +0.6 to +4.9%, P=0.014), without significant overall change (−1.0%, 95% CI −2.1 to 0.1%, P=0.079). There were no statistically significant differences in index visit resource utilization, 60‐day MACE or 60‐day MACE‐CR. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of RISTRA‐ACS was associated with better allocation of 30‐day objective cardiac testing and no change in index visit resource utilization or 60‐day MACE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03286179. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8751925/ /pubmed/34743565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022539 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mark, Dustin G.
Huang, Jie
Ballard, Dustin W.
Kene, Mamata V.
Sax, Dana R.
Chettipally, Uli K.
Lin, James S.
Bouvet, Sean C.
Cotton, Dale M.
Anderson, Megan L.
McLachlan, Ian D.
Simon, Laura E.
Shan, Judy
Rauchwerger, Adina S.
Vinson, David R.
Reed, Mary E.
Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study
title Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study
title_full Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study
title_fullStr Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study
title_short Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study
title_sort graded coronary risk stratification for emergency department patients with chest pain: a controlled cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34743565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022539
work_keys_str_mv AT markdusting gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT huangjie gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT ballarddustinw gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT kenemamatav gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT saxdanar gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT chettipallyulik gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT linjamess gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT bouvetseanc gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT cottondalem gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT andersonmeganl gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT mclachlaniand gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT simonlaurae gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT shanjudy gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT rauchwergeradinas gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT vinsondavidr gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT reedmarye gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy
AT gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy