Cargando…
Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study
BACKGROUND: Resource utilization among emergency department (ED) patients with possible coronary chest pain is highly variable. METHODS AND RESULTS: Controlled cohort study amongst 21 EDs of an integrated healthcare system examining the implementation of a graded coronary risk stratification algorit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34743565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022539 |
_version_ | 1784631782979665920 |
---|---|
author | Mark, Dustin G. Huang, Jie Ballard, Dustin W. Kene, Mamata V. Sax, Dana R. Chettipally, Uli K. Lin, James S. Bouvet, Sean C. Cotton, Dale M. Anderson, Megan L. McLachlan, Ian D. Simon, Laura E. Shan, Judy Rauchwerger, Adina S. Vinson, David R. Reed, Mary E. |
author_facet | Mark, Dustin G. Huang, Jie Ballard, Dustin W. Kene, Mamata V. Sax, Dana R. Chettipally, Uli K. Lin, James S. Bouvet, Sean C. Cotton, Dale M. Anderson, Megan L. McLachlan, Ian D. Simon, Laura E. Shan, Judy Rauchwerger, Adina S. Vinson, David R. Reed, Mary E. |
author_sort | Mark, Dustin G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Resource utilization among emergency department (ED) patients with possible coronary chest pain is highly variable. METHODS AND RESULTS: Controlled cohort study amongst 21 EDs of an integrated healthcare system examining the implementation of a graded coronary risk stratification algorithm (RISTRA‐ACS [risk stratification for acute coronary syndrome]). Thirteen EDs had access to RISTRA‐ACS within the electronic health record (RISTRA sites) beginning in month 24 of a 48‐month study period (January 2016 to December 2019); the remaining 8 EDs served as contemporaneous controls. Study participants had a chief complaint of chest pain and serum troponin measurement in the ED. The primary outcome was index visit resource utilization (observation unit or hospital admission, or 7‐day objective cardiac testing). Secondary outcomes were 30‐day objective cardiac testing, 60‐day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and 60‐day MACE‐CR (MACE excluding coronary revascularization). Difference‐in‐differences analyses controlled for secular trends with stratification by estimated risk and adjustment for risk factors, ED physician and facility. A total of 154 914 encounters were included. Relative to control sites, 30‐day objective cardiac testing decreased at RISTRA sites among patients with low (≤2%) estimated 60‐day MACE risk (−2.5%, 95% CI −3.7 to −1.2%, P<0.001) and increased among patients with non‐low (>2%) estimated risk (+2.8%, 95% CI +0.6 to +4.9%, P=0.014), without significant overall change (−1.0%, 95% CI −2.1 to 0.1%, P=0.079). There were no statistically significant differences in index visit resource utilization, 60‐day MACE or 60‐day MACE‐CR. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of RISTRA‐ACS was associated with better allocation of 30‐day objective cardiac testing and no change in index visit resource utilization or 60‐day MACE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03286179. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8751925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87519252022-01-14 Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study Mark, Dustin G. Huang, Jie Ballard, Dustin W. Kene, Mamata V. Sax, Dana R. Chettipally, Uli K. Lin, James S. Bouvet, Sean C. Cotton, Dale M. Anderson, Megan L. McLachlan, Ian D. Simon, Laura E. Shan, Judy Rauchwerger, Adina S. Vinson, David R. Reed, Mary E. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Resource utilization among emergency department (ED) patients with possible coronary chest pain is highly variable. METHODS AND RESULTS: Controlled cohort study amongst 21 EDs of an integrated healthcare system examining the implementation of a graded coronary risk stratification algorithm (RISTRA‐ACS [risk stratification for acute coronary syndrome]). Thirteen EDs had access to RISTRA‐ACS within the electronic health record (RISTRA sites) beginning in month 24 of a 48‐month study period (January 2016 to December 2019); the remaining 8 EDs served as contemporaneous controls. Study participants had a chief complaint of chest pain and serum troponin measurement in the ED. The primary outcome was index visit resource utilization (observation unit or hospital admission, or 7‐day objective cardiac testing). Secondary outcomes were 30‐day objective cardiac testing, 60‐day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and 60‐day MACE‐CR (MACE excluding coronary revascularization). Difference‐in‐differences analyses controlled for secular trends with stratification by estimated risk and adjustment for risk factors, ED physician and facility. A total of 154 914 encounters were included. Relative to control sites, 30‐day objective cardiac testing decreased at RISTRA sites among patients with low (≤2%) estimated 60‐day MACE risk (−2.5%, 95% CI −3.7 to −1.2%, P<0.001) and increased among patients with non‐low (>2%) estimated risk (+2.8%, 95% CI +0.6 to +4.9%, P=0.014), without significant overall change (−1.0%, 95% CI −2.1 to 0.1%, P=0.079). There were no statistically significant differences in index visit resource utilization, 60‐day MACE or 60‐day MACE‐CR. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of RISTRA‐ACS was associated with better allocation of 30‐day objective cardiac testing and no change in index visit resource utilization or 60‐day MACE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03286179. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8751925/ /pubmed/34743565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022539 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mark, Dustin G. Huang, Jie Ballard, Dustin W. Kene, Mamata V. Sax, Dana R. Chettipally, Uli K. Lin, James S. Bouvet, Sean C. Cotton, Dale M. Anderson, Megan L. McLachlan, Ian D. Simon, Laura E. Shan, Judy Rauchwerger, Adina S. Vinson, David R. Reed, Mary E. Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study |
title | Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study |
title_full | Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study |
title_short | Graded Coronary Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study |
title_sort | graded coronary risk stratification for emergency department patients with chest pain: a controlled cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34743565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022539 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT markdusting gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT huangjie gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT ballarddustinw gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT kenemamatav gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT saxdanar gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT chettipallyulik gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT linjamess gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT bouvetseanc gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT cottondalem gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT andersonmeganl gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT mclachlaniand gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT simonlaurae gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT shanjudy gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT rauchwergeradinas gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT vinsondavidr gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT reedmarye gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy AT gradedcoronaryriskstratificationforemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpainacontrolledcohortstudy |