Cargando…

Hemodynamic Analysis of Pipeline Embolization Device Stent for Treatment of Giant Intracranial Aneurysm under Unsupervised Learning Algorithm

To treat large intracranial aneurysms, pipeline embolization device (PED) stent with unsupervised learning algorithms was utilized. Unsupervised learning model algorithm was used to screen aneurysm health big data, find aneurysm blood flow and PED stent positioning characteristic parameters, and gui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Haibin, You, Wei, Lv, Jian, Li, Youxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8509195
_version_ 1784631841094893568
author Gao, Haibin
You, Wei
Lv, Jian
Li, Youxiang
author_facet Gao, Haibin
You, Wei
Lv, Jian
Li, Youxiang
author_sort Gao, Haibin
collection PubMed
description To treat large intracranial aneurysms, pipeline embolization device (PED) stent with unsupervised learning algorithms was utilized. Unsupervised learning model algorithm was used to screen aneurysm health big data, find aneurysm blood flow and PED stent positioning characteristic parameters, and guide PED stent treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The research objects were 100 patients with intracranial large aneurysm admitted to X Hospital of X Province from June 2020 to June 2021, who were enrolled into two groups. One group used the prototype transfer generative adversarial network (PTGAN) model to measure mean blood flow and mean vascular pressure and guide the placement of PED stents (PTGAN group). The other group did not use the model to place PED (control group). The PTGAN model can learn feature information from horizontal and vertical directions, with smooth edges and prominent features, which can effectively extract the main morphological and texture features of aneurysms. Compared with the convolutional neural network (CNN) model, the accuracy of the PTGAN model increased by 8.449% (87.452%–79.003%), and the precision increased by 8.347% (91.23%–82.883%). The recall rate increased by 7.011% (87.231%–80.22%), and the F1 score increased by 8.09% (89.73%–81.64%). After the adoption of the PTGAN model, the average blood flow inside the aneurysm body was 0.22 (m/s). After the adoption of the CNN model, the average blood flow inside the aneurysm body was 0.21 (m/s), and the difference was 0.01 (m/s), which was considerable (p < 0.05). Through this research, it was found that the PTGAN model was better than the CNN model in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score values. The PTGAN model was better than the CNN model in detecting the average blood flow rate and average blood pressure after treatment, and the blood flowed smoothly. Postoperative complications and postoperative relief were also better than those of the control group. In summary, based on the unsupervised learning algorithm, the PED stent had a good adoption effect in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms and was suitable for subsequent treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8752217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87522172022-01-12 Hemodynamic Analysis of Pipeline Embolization Device Stent for Treatment of Giant Intracranial Aneurysm under Unsupervised Learning Algorithm Gao, Haibin You, Wei Lv, Jian Li, Youxiang J Healthc Eng Research Article To treat large intracranial aneurysms, pipeline embolization device (PED) stent with unsupervised learning algorithms was utilized. Unsupervised learning model algorithm was used to screen aneurysm health big data, find aneurysm blood flow and PED stent positioning characteristic parameters, and guide PED stent treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The research objects were 100 patients with intracranial large aneurysm admitted to X Hospital of X Province from June 2020 to June 2021, who were enrolled into two groups. One group used the prototype transfer generative adversarial network (PTGAN) model to measure mean blood flow and mean vascular pressure and guide the placement of PED stents (PTGAN group). The other group did not use the model to place PED (control group). The PTGAN model can learn feature information from horizontal and vertical directions, with smooth edges and prominent features, which can effectively extract the main morphological and texture features of aneurysms. Compared with the convolutional neural network (CNN) model, the accuracy of the PTGAN model increased by 8.449% (87.452%–79.003%), and the precision increased by 8.347% (91.23%–82.883%). The recall rate increased by 7.011% (87.231%–80.22%), and the F1 score increased by 8.09% (89.73%–81.64%). After the adoption of the PTGAN model, the average blood flow inside the aneurysm body was 0.22 (m/s). After the adoption of the CNN model, the average blood flow inside the aneurysm body was 0.21 (m/s), and the difference was 0.01 (m/s), which was considerable (p < 0.05). Through this research, it was found that the PTGAN model was better than the CNN model in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score values. The PTGAN model was better than the CNN model in detecting the average blood flow rate and average blood pressure after treatment, and the blood flowed smoothly. Postoperative complications and postoperative relief were also better than those of the control group. In summary, based on the unsupervised learning algorithm, the PED stent had a good adoption effect in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms and was suitable for subsequent treatment. Hindawi 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8752217/ /pubmed/35028125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8509195 Text en Copyright © 2022 Haibin Gao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gao, Haibin
You, Wei
Lv, Jian
Li, Youxiang
Hemodynamic Analysis of Pipeline Embolization Device Stent for Treatment of Giant Intracranial Aneurysm under Unsupervised Learning Algorithm
title Hemodynamic Analysis of Pipeline Embolization Device Stent for Treatment of Giant Intracranial Aneurysm under Unsupervised Learning Algorithm
title_full Hemodynamic Analysis of Pipeline Embolization Device Stent for Treatment of Giant Intracranial Aneurysm under Unsupervised Learning Algorithm
title_fullStr Hemodynamic Analysis of Pipeline Embolization Device Stent for Treatment of Giant Intracranial Aneurysm under Unsupervised Learning Algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Hemodynamic Analysis of Pipeline Embolization Device Stent for Treatment of Giant Intracranial Aneurysm under Unsupervised Learning Algorithm
title_short Hemodynamic Analysis of Pipeline Embolization Device Stent for Treatment of Giant Intracranial Aneurysm under Unsupervised Learning Algorithm
title_sort hemodynamic analysis of pipeline embolization device stent for treatment of giant intracranial aneurysm under unsupervised learning algorithm
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8509195
work_keys_str_mv AT gaohaibin hemodynamicanalysisofpipelineembolizationdevicestentfortreatmentofgiantintracranialaneurysmunderunsupervisedlearningalgorithm
AT youwei hemodynamicanalysisofpipelineembolizationdevicestentfortreatmentofgiantintracranialaneurysmunderunsupervisedlearningalgorithm
AT lvjian hemodynamicanalysisofpipelineembolizationdevicestentfortreatmentofgiantintracranialaneurysmunderunsupervisedlearningalgorithm
AT liyouxiang hemodynamicanalysisofpipelineembolizationdevicestentfortreatmentofgiantintracranialaneurysmunderunsupervisedlearningalgorithm