Cargando…
Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning?
[Purpose] Learning of movement procedures (sequence learning) is essential in physical therapy. Studies have shown that sequence-specific learning may be integrated from an early stage. This study examines the effect of an interference task on the retention of sequence-specific learning. [Participan...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.34.1 |
_version_ | 1784631855336652800 |
---|---|
author | Shibazaki, Akito Watanabe, Miyoko |
author_facet | Shibazaki, Akito Watanabe, Miyoko |
author_sort | Shibazaki, Akito |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] Learning of movement procedures (sequence learning) is essential in physical therapy. Studies have shown that sequence-specific learning may be integrated from an early stage. This study examines the effect of an interference task on the retention of sequence-specific learning. [Participants and Methods] Young adults were randomly divided into a control group and an interference task group, and two experiments were performed. In each experiment, the control group practiced task A in both the acquisition phase and the retention phase four to five hours later. The Interference group practiced task A in the acquisition phase followed by task B, which is similar to the interference task, and then performed task A in the retention phase four to five hours later. In Experiment 2, the amount of practice for task A in the practice phase was 25% of that in Experiment 1. [Results] Sequence-specific learning occurred in the early stages of practice. In particular, the performance of Experiment 1 reached the ceiling. The results of the retention test showed no significant interference effect due to similar tasks. [Conclusion] Implicit sequence-specific learning stabilizes performance early and is not affected by interference tasks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8752284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87522842022-01-14 Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning? Shibazaki, Akito Watanabe, Miyoko J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] Learning of movement procedures (sequence learning) is essential in physical therapy. Studies have shown that sequence-specific learning may be integrated from an early stage. This study examines the effect of an interference task on the retention of sequence-specific learning. [Participants and Methods] Young adults were randomly divided into a control group and an interference task group, and two experiments were performed. In each experiment, the control group practiced task A in both the acquisition phase and the retention phase four to five hours later. The Interference group practiced task A in the acquisition phase followed by task B, which is similar to the interference task, and then performed task A in the retention phase four to five hours later. In Experiment 2, the amount of practice for task A in the practice phase was 25% of that in Experiment 1. [Results] Sequence-specific learning occurred in the early stages of practice. In particular, the performance of Experiment 1 reached the ceiling. The results of the retention test showed no significant interference effect due to similar tasks. [Conclusion] Implicit sequence-specific learning stabilizes performance early and is not affected by interference tasks. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2022-01-12 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8752284/ /pubmed/35035070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.34.1 Text en 2022©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shibazaki, Akito Watanabe, Miyoko Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning? |
title | Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning? |
title_full | Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning? |
title_fullStr | Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning? |
title_short | Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning? |
title_sort | does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.34.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shibazakiakito doesaninterferencetaskimmediatelyafterpracticepreventmemoryconsolidationofsequencespecificlearning AT watanabemiyoko doesaninterferencetaskimmediatelyafterpracticepreventmemoryconsolidationofsequencespecificlearning |