Cargando…

Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning?

[Purpose] Learning of movement procedures (sequence learning) is essential in physical therapy. Studies have shown that sequence-specific learning may be integrated from an early stage. This study examines the effect of an interference task on the retention of sequence-specific learning. [Participan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shibazaki, Akito, Watanabe, Miyoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.34.1
_version_ 1784631855336652800
author Shibazaki, Akito
Watanabe, Miyoko
author_facet Shibazaki, Akito
Watanabe, Miyoko
author_sort Shibazaki, Akito
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] Learning of movement procedures (sequence learning) is essential in physical therapy. Studies have shown that sequence-specific learning may be integrated from an early stage. This study examines the effect of an interference task on the retention of sequence-specific learning. [Participants and Methods] Young adults were randomly divided into a control group and an interference task group, and two experiments were performed. In each experiment, the control group practiced task A in both the acquisition phase and the retention phase four to five hours later. The Interference group practiced task A in the acquisition phase followed by task B, which is similar to the interference task, and then performed task A in the retention phase four to five hours later. In Experiment 2, the amount of practice for task A in the practice phase was 25% of that in Experiment 1. [Results] Sequence-specific learning occurred in the early stages of practice. In particular, the performance of Experiment 1 reached the ceiling. The results of the retention test showed no significant interference effect due to similar tasks. [Conclusion] Implicit sequence-specific learning stabilizes performance early and is not affected by interference tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8752284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87522842022-01-14 Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning? Shibazaki, Akito Watanabe, Miyoko J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] Learning of movement procedures (sequence learning) is essential in physical therapy. Studies have shown that sequence-specific learning may be integrated from an early stage. This study examines the effect of an interference task on the retention of sequence-specific learning. [Participants and Methods] Young adults were randomly divided into a control group and an interference task group, and two experiments were performed. In each experiment, the control group practiced task A in both the acquisition phase and the retention phase four to five hours later. The Interference group practiced task A in the acquisition phase followed by task B, which is similar to the interference task, and then performed task A in the retention phase four to five hours later. In Experiment 2, the amount of practice for task A in the practice phase was 25% of that in Experiment 1. [Results] Sequence-specific learning occurred in the early stages of practice. In particular, the performance of Experiment 1 reached the ceiling. The results of the retention test showed no significant interference effect due to similar tasks. [Conclusion] Implicit sequence-specific learning stabilizes performance early and is not affected by interference tasks. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2022-01-12 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8752284/ /pubmed/35035070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.34.1 Text en 2022©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Shibazaki, Akito
Watanabe, Miyoko
Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning?
title Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning?
title_full Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning?
title_fullStr Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning?
title_full_unstemmed Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning?
title_short Does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning?
title_sort does an interference task immediately after practice prevent memory consolidation of sequence-specific learning?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.34.1
work_keys_str_mv AT shibazakiakito doesaninterferencetaskimmediatelyafterpracticepreventmemoryconsolidationofsequencespecificlearning
AT watanabemiyoko doesaninterferencetaskimmediatelyafterpracticepreventmemoryconsolidationofsequencespecificlearning