Cargando…

Managing the risks of making the wrong diagnosis: First, do no harm

The appropriate use of diagnostics is important as misdiagnosis may have serious consequences. Confidence in a diagnostic test result depends on the test’s accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) in the context of the use-case (who is tested and why) and the prevalence of the condition investigated....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olliaro, Piero, Torreele, Els
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33845195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.004
_version_ 1784631889873600512
author Olliaro, Piero
Torreele, Els
author_facet Olliaro, Piero
Torreele, Els
author_sort Olliaro, Piero
collection PubMed
description The appropriate use of diagnostics is important as misdiagnosis may have serious consequences. Confidence in a diagnostic test result depends on the test’s accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) in the context of the use-case (who is tested and why) and the prevalence of the condition investigated. Here, we offer an approach to diagnostics focused on the risks and effects of making the wrong diagnosis. We propose ‘fitness brackets’ for a given test to define the range within which the test is fit-for-purpose, based on the use-case and risk-management principles. We use as exemplars tests for dengue pre-vaccination screening and tests for diagnosing Covid-19 in different settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8752462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87524622022-01-19 Managing the risks of making the wrong diagnosis: First, do no harm Olliaro, Piero Torreele, Els Int J Infect Dis Perspective The appropriate use of diagnostics is important as misdiagnosis may have serious consequences. Confidence in a diagnostic test result depends on the test’s accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) in the context of the use-case (who is tested and why) and the prevalence of the condition investigated. Here, we offer an approach to diagnostics focused on the risks and effects of making the wrong diagnosis. We propose ‘fitness brackets’ for a given test to define the range within which the test is fit-for-purpose, based on the use-case and risk-management principles. We use as exemplars tests for dengue pre-vaccination screening and tests for diagnosing Covid-19 in different settings. Elsevier 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8752462/ /pubmed/33845195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.004 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Perspective
Olliaro, Piero
Torreele, Els
Managing the risks of making the wrong diagnosis: First, do no harm
title Managing the risks of making the wrong diagnosis: First, do no harm
title_full Managing the risks of making the wrong diagnosis: First, do no harm
title_fullStr Managing the risks of making the wrong diagnosis: First, do no harm
title_full_unstemmed Managing the risks of making the wrong diagnosis: First, do no harm
title_short Managing the risks of making the wrong diagnosis: First, do no harm
title_sort managing the risks of making the wrong diagnosis: first, do no harm
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33845195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.004
work_keys_str_mv AT olliaropiero managingtherisksofmakingthewrongdiagnosisfirstdonoharm
AT torreeleels managingtherisksofmakingthewrongdiagnosisfirstdonoharm