Cargando…

Living donor liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma including macrovascular invasion

BACKGROUND: The indications for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continue to evolve. The aim of this study was to report outcomes in patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for HCC outside traditional criteria including macrovascular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez, Naqvi, Wajih, Khan, Nusrat Yar, Zia, Haseeb Haider, Dar, Faisal Saud, Khan, Zahid Amin, Rana, Atif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03665-9
_version_ 1784631899425079296
author Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez
Naqvi, Wajih
Khan, Nusrat Yar
Zia, Haseeb Haider
Dar, Faisal Saud
Khan, Zahid Amin
Rana, Atif
author_facet Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez
Naqvi, Wajih
Khan, Nusrat Yar
Zia, Haseeb Haider
Dar, Faisal Saud
Khan, Zahid Amin
Rana, Atif
author_sort Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The indications for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continue to evolve. The aim of this study was to report outcomes in patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for HCC outside traditional criteria including macrovascular invasion (MVI). METHODS: We reviewed outcomes in patients who met the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria (n = 159) and our center-specific criteria (UCSF+) (largest tumor diameter ≤ 10 cm, any tumor number, AFP ≤ 1000 ng/ml) (n = 58). We also assessed outcomes in patients with MVI (n = 27). RESULTS: The median follow was 28 (10.6–42.7) months. The 5 year overall survival and risk of recurrence (RR) in the UCSF and UCSF + group was 71% vs 69% (P = 0.7) and 13% vs 36% (P = 0.1) respectively. When patients with AFP > 600 ng/ml were excluded from the UCSF + group, RR was 27% (P = 0.3). Among patients with MVI who had downstaging (DS), 4/5(80%) in low-risk group (good response and AFP ≤ 100 ng/ml) and 2/10 (20%) in the high-risk group (poor response or AFP > 100 ng/ml) were alive at the last follow-up. When DS was not feasible, 3/3 (100%) in the low-risk group (AFP ≤ 100 ng/ml + Vp1-2 MVI) and 1/9 (9.1%) in the high-risk group (AFP > 100 or Vp3 MVI) were alive. The 5 year OS in the low-risk MVI group was 85% (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: With inclusion of AFP, response to downstaging and degree of MVI, acceptable survival can be achieved with LDLT for HCC outside traditional criteria. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03665-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8752562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87525622022-01-20 Living donor liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma including macrovascular invasion Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez Naqvi, Wajih Khan, Nusrat Yar Zia, Haseeb Haider Dar, Faisal Saud Khan, Zahid Amin Rana, Atif J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology BACKGROUND: The indications for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continue to evolve. The aim of this study was to report outcomes in patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for HCC outside traditional criteria including macrovascular invasion (MVI). METHODS: We reviewed outcomes in patients who met the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria (n = 159) and our center-specific criteria (UCSF+) (largest tumor diameter ≤ 10 cm, any tumor number, AFP ≤ 1000 ng/ml) (n = 58). We also assessed outcomes in patients with MVI (n = 27). RESULTS: The median follow was 28 (10.6–42.7) months. The 5 year overall survival and risk of recurrence (RR) in the UCSF and UCSF + group was 71% vs 69% (P = 0.7) and 13% vs 36% (P = 0.1) respectively. When patients with AFP > 600 ng/ml were excluded from the UCSF + group, RR was 27% (P = 0.3). Among patients with MVI who had downstaging (DS), 4/5(80%) in low-risk group (good response and AFP ≤ 100 ng/ml) and 2/10 (20%) in the high-risk group (poor response or AFP > 100 ng/ml) were alive at the last follow-up. When DS was not feasible, 3/3 (100%) in the low-risk group (AFP ≤ 100 ng/ml + Vp1-2 MVI) and 1/9 (9.1%) in the high-risk group (AFP > 100 or Vp3 MVI) were alive. The 5 year OS in the low-risk MVI group was 85% (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: With inclusion of AFP, response to downstaging and degree of MVI, acceptable survival can be achieved with LDLT for HCC outside traditional criteria. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03665-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8752562/ /pubmed/34117916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03665-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article – Clinical Oncology
Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez
Naqvi, Wajih
Khan, Nusrat Yar
Zia, Haseeb Haider
Dar, Faisal Saud
Khan, Zahid Amin
Rana, Atif
Living donor liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma including macrovascular invasion
title Living donor liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma including macrovascular invasion
title_full Living donor liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma including macrovascular invasion
title_fullStr Living donor liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma including macrovascular invasion
title_full_unstemmed Living donor liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma including macrovascular invasion
title_short Living donor liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma including macrovascular invasion
title_sort living donor liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma including macrovascular invasion
topic Original Article – Clinical Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03665-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattiabubakarhafeez livingdonorlivertransplantationforadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaincludingmacrovascularinvasion
AT naqviwajih livingdonorlivertransplantationforadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaincludingmacrovascularinvasion
AT khannusratyar livingdonorlivertransplantationforadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaincludingmacrovascularinvasion
AT ziahaseebhaider livingdonorlivertransplantationforadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaincludingmacrovascularinvasion
AT darfaisalsaud livingdonorlivertransplantationforadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaincludingmacrovascularinvasion
AT khanzahidamin livingdonorlivertransplantationforadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaincludingmacrovascularinvasion
AT ranaatif livingdonorlivertransplantationforadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomaincludingmacrovascularinvasion