Cargando…
Comparative analysis of proficiencies of various textures and geometric features in breast mass classification using k-nearest neighbor
This paper introduces a comparative analysis of the proficiencies of various textures and geometric features in the diagnosis of breast masses on mammograms. An improved machine learning-based framework was developed for this study. The proposed system was tested using 106 full field digital mammogr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35018506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42492-021-00100-1 |
_version_ | 1784631917501480960 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Harmandeep Sharma, Vipul Singh, Damanpreet |
author_facet | Singh, Harmandeep Sharma, Vipul Singh, Damanpreet |
author_sort | Singh, Harmandeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper introduces a comparative analysis of the proficiencies of various textures and geometric features in the diagnosis of breast masses on mammograms. An improved machine learning-based framework was developed for this study. The proposed system was tested using 106 full field digital mammography images from the INbreast dataset, containing a total of 115 breast mass lesions. The proficiencies of individual and various combinations of computed textures and geometric features were investigated by evaluating their contributions towards attaining higher classification accuracies. Four state-of-the-art filter-based feature selection algorithms (Relief-F, Pearson correlation coefficient, neighborhood component analysis, and term variance) were employed to select the top 20 most discriminative features. The Relief-F algorithm outperformed other feature selection algorithms in terms of classification results by reporting 85.2% accuracy, 82.0% sensitivity, and 88.0% specificity. A set of nine most discriminative features were then selected, out of the earlier mentioned 20 features obtained using Relief-F, as a result of further simulations. The classification performances of six state-of-the-art machine learning classifiers, namely k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), support vector machine, decision tree, Naive Bayes, random forest, and ensemble tree, were investigated, and the obtained results revealed that the best classification results (accuracy = 90.4%, sensitivity = 92.0%, specificity = 88.0%) were obtained for the k-NN classifier with the number of neighbors having k = 5 and squared inverse distance weight. The key findings include the identification of the nine most discriminative features, that is, FD26 (Fourier Descriptor), Euler number, solidity, mean, FD14, FD13, periodicity, skewness, and contrast out of a pool of 125 texture and geometric features. The proposed results revealed that the selected nine features can be used for the classification of breast masses in mammograms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8752652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87526522022-01-20 Comparative analysis of proficiencies of various textures and geometric features in breast mass classification using k-nearest neighbor Singh, Harmandeep Sharma, Vipul Singh, Damanpreet Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art Original Article This paper introduces a comparative analysis of the proficiencies of various textures and geometric features in the diagnosis of breast masses on mammograms. An improved machine learning-based framework was developed for this study. The proposed system was tested using 106 full field digital mammography images from the INbreast dataset, containing a total of 115 breast mass lesions. The proficiencies of individual and various combinations of computed textures and geometric features were investigated by evaluating their contributions towards attaining higher classification accuracies. Four state-of-the-art filter-based feature selection algorithms (Relief-F, Pearson correlation coefficient, neighborhood component analysis, and term variance) were employed to select the top 20 most discriminative features. The Relief-F algorithm outperformed other feature selection algorithms in terms of classification results by reporting 85.2% accuracy, 82.0% sensitivity, and 88.0% specificity. A set of nine most discriminative features were then selected, out of the earlier mentioned 20 features obtained using Relief-F, as a result of further simulations. The classification performances of six state-of-the-art machine learning classifiers, namely k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), support vector machine, decision tree, Naive Bayes, random forest, and ensemble tree, were investigated, and the obtained results revealed that the best classification results (accuracy = 90.4%, sensitivity = 92.0%, specificity = 88.0%) were obtained for the k-NN classifier with the number of neighbors having k = 5 and squared inverse distance weight. The key findings include the identification of the nine most discriminative features, that is, FD26 (Fourier Descriptor), Euler number, solidity, mean, FD14, FD13, periodicity, skewness, and contrast out of a pool of 125 texture and geometric features. The proposed results revealed that the selected nine features can be used for the classification of breast masses in mammograms. Springer Singapore 2022-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8752652/ /pubmed/35018506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42492-021-00100-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singh, Harmandeep Sharma, Vipul Singh, Damanpreet Comparative analysis of proficiencies of various textures and geometric features in breast mass classification using k-nearest neighbor |
title | Comparative analysis of proficiencies of various textures and geometric features in breast mass classification using k-nearest neighbor |
title_full | Comparative analysis of proficiencies of various textures and geometric features in breast mass classification using k-nearest neighbor |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of proficiencies of various textures and geometric features in breast mass classification using k-nearest neighbor |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of proficiencies of various textures and geometric features in breast mass classification using k-nearest neighbor |
title_short | Comparative analysis of proficiencies of various textures and geometric features in breast mass classification using k-nearest neighbor |
title_sort | comparative analysis of proficiencies of various textures and geometric features in breast mass classification using k-nearest neighbor |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35018506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42492-021-00100-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhharmandeep comparativeanalysisofproficienciesofvarioustexturesandgeometricfeaturesinbreastmassclassificationusingknearestneighbor AT sharmavipul comparativeanalysisofproficienciesofvarioustexturesandgeometricfeaturesinbreastmassclassificationusingknearestneighbor AT singhdamanpreet comparativeanalysisofproficienciesofvarioustexturesandgeometricfeaturesinbreastmassclassificationusingknearestneighbor |