Cargando…

Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case-Control Study

OBJECTIVE: To identify potential risk factors of unsatisfactory screw position during robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation performed in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from March 2018 to March 2019 was conducted. Research data w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Qi, Fan, Ming-Xing, Han, Xiao-Guang, Liu, Ya-Jun, He, Da, Liu, Bo, Tian, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35000338
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2142560.180
_version_ 1784631926288547840
author Zhang, Qi
Fan, Ming-Xing
Han, Xiao-Guang
Liu, Ya-Jun
He, Da
Liu, Bo
Tian, Wei
author_facet Zhang, Qi
Fan, Ming-Xing
Han, Xiao-Guang
Liu, Ya-Jun
He, Da
Liu, Bo
Tian, Wei
author_sort Zhang, Qi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify potential risk factors of unsatisfactory screw position during robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation performed in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from March 2018 to March 2019 was conducted. Research data was collected from the medical record and imaging systems. Univariate tests were performed on the potential risk factors (patient’s characteristics and surgical factors) of unsatisfactory screw position during robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation. For statistically significant variables in univariate tests, a logistic regression test was used to identify independent risk factors for unsatisfactory screw position. RESULTS: A total of 780 pedicle screws placed in 163 robot-assisted surgeries were analyzed. The rate of perfect screw positions was 93.08%, and the unsatisfactory rate was 6.92%. In patients with severe obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) (odds ratio [OR], 2.459; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.199–5.044; p=0.014), osteoporosis (T ≤ -2.5) (OR, 1.857; 95% CI, 1.046–3.295; p=0.034), and the segments 3 levels away from the tracker (OR, 2.216; 95% CI, 1.119–4.387; p=0.022), robot-assisted pedicle screw placement has a higher risk of screw malposition. CONCLUSION: During robot-assisted pedicle screw placement for patients with severe obesity, osteoporosis, and segments 3 levels away from the tracker, vigilance should be maintained during surgery to avoid postoperative complications due to unsatisfactory screw position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8752688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87526882022-01-21 Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case-Control Study Zhang, Qi Fan, Ming-Xing Han, Xiao-Guang Liu, Ya-Jun He, Da Liu, Bo Tian, Wei Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: To identify potential risk factors of unsatisfactory screw position during robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation performed in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from March 2018 to March 2019 was conducted. Research data was collected from the medical record and imaging systems. Univariate tests were performed on the potential risk factors (patient’s characteristics and surgical factors) of unsatisfactory screw position during robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation. For statistically significant variables in univariate tests, a logistic regression test was used to identify independent risk factors for unsatisfactory screw position. RESULTS: A total of 780 pedicle screws placed in 163 robot-assisted surgeries were analyzed. The rate of perfect screw positions was 93.08%, and the unsatisfactory rate was 6.92%. In patients with severe obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) (odds ratio [OR], 2.459; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.199–5.044; p=0.014), osteoporosis (T ≤ -2.5) (OR, 1.857; 95% CI, 1.046–3.295; p=0.034), and the segments 3 levels away from the tracker (OR, 2.216; 95% CI, 1.119–4.387; p=0.022), robot-assisted pedicle screw placement has a higher risk of screw malposition. CONCLUSION: During robot-assisted pedicle screw placement for patients with severe obesity, osteoporosis, and segments 3 levels away from the tracker, vigilance should be maintained during surgery to avoid postoperative complications due to unsatisfactory screw position. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021-12 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8752688/ /pubmed/35000338 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2142560.180 Text en Copyright © 2021 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Qi
Fan, Ming-Xing
Han, Xiao-Guang
Liu, Ya-Jun
He, Da
Liu, Bo
Tian, Wei
Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case-Control Study
title Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case-Control Study
title_full Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case-Control Study
title_fullStr Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case-Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case-Control Study
title_short Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case-Control Study
title_sort risk factors of unsatisfactory robot-assisted pedicle screw placement: a case-control study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35000338
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2142560.180
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangqi riskfactorsofunsatisfactoryrobotassistedpediclescrewplacementacasecontrolstudy
AT fanmingxing riskfactorsofunsatisfactoryrobotassistedpediclescrewplacementacasecontrolstudy
AT hanxiaoguang riskfactorsofunsatisfactoryrobotassistedpediclescrewplacementacasecontrolstudy
AT liuyajun riskfactorsofunsatisfactoryrobotassistedpediclescrewplacementacasecontrolstudy
AT heda riskfactorsofunsatisfactoryrobotassistedpediclescrewplacementacasecontrolstudy
AT liubo riskfactorsofunsatisfactoryrobotassistedpediclescrewplacementacasecontrolstudy
AT tianwei riskfactorsofunsatisfactoryrobotassistedpediclescrewplacementacasecontrolstudy