Cargando…

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the Neck in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Degenerative Disease of the Cervical Spine

OBJECTIVE: To perform the psychometric validation of the Dutch version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck. METHODS: A total of 178 patients, who had an indication for surgery due to degenerative cervical spinal disease, were enrolled in the study. They filled in a baseline bookle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gadjradj, Pravesh S., Chin-See-Chong, Timothy C., Donk, Daphne, Depauw, Paul, van Tulder, Maurits W., Harhangi, Biswadjiet S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8752712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35000334
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2142682.341
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To perform the psychometric validation of the Dutch version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck. METHODS: A total of 178 patients, who had an indication for surgery due to degenerative cervical spinal disease, were enrolled in the study. They filled in a baseline booklet containing the Dutch version of the COMI-neck, Likert-scales for neck and arm/shoulder pain, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) and the 12-item Short Form health survey (SF-12). Aside from analyzing construct validity using the Spearman correlation test, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness at 3 months were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, respectively. RESULTS: The COMI-neck showed good acceptability with missing data ranging from 0% to 4.5% and some floor/ceiling effects for 3 of the domains at baseline. The COMI-summary score showed good to very good correlation with the EQ5D (ρ=-0.43), the physical component summary of the SF-12 (ρ=-0.47) and the NDI (ρ=0.73). Individual domains showed correlations of -0.28 to 0.85 with the reference questionnaires. Test-retest reliability analysis showed an ICC of 0.91 with a minimal detectable change of 1.7. Responsiveness analysis of the COMI-neck showed an area under 0.79 under the ROC-curve. The standardized response mean for a good outcome was 1.24 and for a poor outcome 0.37. CONCLUSION: The current study shows that the Dutch version of the COMI-neck is a valid, reliable and responsive Patient-Reported Outcome Measure, among patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical spinal disorders.