Cargando…

"Unconstitutionality of Patent Extensions": Decision of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil (Supremo Tribunal Federal) 12 May 2021 – Case No. 672/2020

1. The sole paragraph of Art. 40 of the Brazilian Intellectual Property Act (Law No. 9279/1996) is unconstitutional. 2. This decision has ex nunc effects. 3. Exempted from the ex nunc effects – with only ex tunc effects – are (i) the judicial actions filed by or on 7 April 2021 (date of the partial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8753007/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01144-9
_version_ 1784631999197085696
collection PubMed
description 1. The sole paragraph of Art. 40 of the Brazilian Intellectual Property Act (Law No. 9279/1996) is unconstitutional. 2. This decision has ex nunc effects. 3. Exempted from the ex nunc effects – with only ex tunc effects – are (i) the judicial actions filed by or on 7 April 2021 (date of the partial upholding of the preliminary injunction in the present case), and (ii) the patents granted with an extension of the term related to pharmaceutical products and processes, as well as healthcare devices and/or materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8753007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87530072022-01-12 "Unconstitutionality of Patent Extensions": Decision of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil (Supremo Tribunal Federal) 12 May 2021 – Case No. 672/2020 IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law Decision • Patent Law 1. The sole paragraph of Art. 40 of the Brazilian Intellectual Property Act (Law No. 9279/1996) is unconstitutional. 2. This decision has ex nunc effects. 3. Exempted from the ex nunc effects – with only ex tunc effects – are (i) the judicial actions filed by or on 7 April 2021 (date of the partial upholding of the preliminary injunction in the present case), and (ii) the patents granted with an extension of the term related to pharmaceutical products and processes, as well as healthcare devices and/or materials. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8753007/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01144-9 Text en © Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Decision • Patent Law
"Unconstitutionality of Patent Extensions": Decision of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil (Supremo Tribunal Federal) 12 May 2021 – Case No. 672/2020
title "Unconstitutionality of Patent Extensions": Decision of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil (Supremo Tribunal Federal) 12 May 2021 – Case No. 672/2020
title_full "Unconstitutionality of Patent Extensions": Decision of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil (Supremo Tribunal Federal) 12 May 2021 – Case No. 672/2020
title_fullStr "Unconstitutionality of Patent Extensions": Decision of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil (Supremo Tribunal Federal) 12 May 2021 – Case No. 672/2020
title_full_unstemmed "Unconstitutionality of Patent Extensions": Decision of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil (Supremo Tribunal Federal) 12 May 2021 – Case No. 672/2020
title_short "Unconstitutionality of Patent Extensions": Decision of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil (Supremo Tribunal Federal) 12 May 2021 – Case No. 672/2020
title_sort "unconstitutionality of patent extensions": decision of the supreme federal court of brazil (supremo tribunal federal) 12 may 2021 – case no. 672/2020
topic Decision • Patent Law
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8753007/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01144-9
work_keys_str_mv AT unconstitutionalityofpatentextensionsdecisionofthesupremefederalcourtofbrazilsupremotribunalfederal12may2021caseno6722020