Cargando…

Risk factors deteriorating severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency measured by stool elastase after pancreatoduodenectomy and the risk factors for weight loss

PURPOSE: The measurement of stool elastase (SE) level is useful for evaluating pancreatic exocrine function. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), and analyze serial changes in nutritional markers and weigh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Ara, Kim, Hongbeom, Sohn, Hee Ju, Lee, Mirang, Kang, Yoon Hyung, Kim, Hyeong Seok, Han, Youngmin, Kang, Jae Seung, Kwon, Wooil, Jang, Jin-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8753381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071116
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2022.102.1.20
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The measurement of stool elastase (SE) level is useful for evaluating pancreatic exocrine function. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), and analyze serial changes in nutritional markers and weight based on the SE level. METHODS: Among patients who underwent PD for periampullary disease, patients whose preoperative and postoperative SE levels were measured were included in the study. The deteriorated (exocrine function) group comprised patients whose SE levels decreased from ≥100 µg/g preoperatively to <100 µg/g postoperatively. Patients whose weight 12 months postoperatively was greater than that 3 months postoperatively were classified into the weight-recovery group. RESULTS: Of the 202 included patients, the deteriorated group had a higher incidence of preoperative SE level above 200 µg/g, benign pathology, and the presence of a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula than the maintained group. Patients who did not undergo weight recovery had a higher rate of history of adjuvant radiotherapy compared to the no-recovery group. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of EPI by measuring SE alone is not sufficient because it does not reflect the nutritional status of patients, and a comprehensive approach that considers other parameters is required for EPI management.