Cargando…

Comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND: Good clinical outcomes for locking plates as an external fixator to treat tibial fractures have been reported. However, external locking plate fixation is still generally rarely performed. This study aimed to compare the stability of an external locking plate fixator with that of a conve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blažević, Dejan, Kodvanj, Janoš, Adamović, Petra, Vidović, Dinko, Trobonjača, Zlatko, Sabalić, Srećko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8753923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35016716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02907-3
_version_ 1784632172386189312
author Blažević, Dejan
Kodvanj, Janoš
Adamović, Petra
Vidović, Dinko
Trobonjača, Zlatko
Sabalić, Srećko
author_facet Blažević, Dejan
Kodvanj, Janoš
Adamović, Petra
Vidović, Dinko
Trobonjača, Zlatko
Sabalić, Srećko
author_sort Blažević, Dejan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Good clinical outcomes for locking plates as an external fixator to treat tibial fractures have been reported. However, external locking plate fixation is still generally rarely performed. This study aimed to compare the stability of an external locking plate fixator with that of a conventional external fixator for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures using finite element analysis. METHODS: Three models were constructed: (1) external locking plate fixation of proximal tibial fracture with lateral proximal tibial locking plate and 5-mm screws (ELP), (2) conventional external fixation of proximal tibial fracture with an 11-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-11), and (3) conventional external fixation of a proximal tibial fracture with a 7-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-7). The stress distribution, displacement at the fracture gap, and stiffness of the three finite element models at 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-mm plate–rod offsets from the lateral surface of the lateral condyle of the tibia were determined. RESULTS: The conventional external fixator showed higher stiffness than the external locking plate fixator. In all models, the stiffness decreased as the distance of the plate–rod from the bone surface increased. The maximum stiffness was 121.06 N/mm in the EF-11 model with 30-mm tibia–rod offset. In the EF-7 model group, the maximum stiffness was 40.00 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia–rod offset. In the ELP model group, the maximum stiffness was 35.79 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia–plate offset. CONCLUSIONS: Finite element analysis indicated that external locking plate fixation is more flexible than conventional external fixation and can influence secondary bone healing. External locking plate fixation requires the placement of the plate as close as possible to the skin, which allows for a low-profile design because the increased distance from the plate to the bone can be too flexible for bone healing. Further experimental mechanical model tests are necessary to validate these finite element models, and further biological analysis is necessary to evaluate the effect of external locking plate fixation on fracture healing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8753923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87539232022-01-18 Comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis Blažević, Dejan Kodvanj, Janoš Adamović, Petra Vidović, Dinko Trobonjača, Zlatko Sabalić, Srećko J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Good clinical outcomes for locking plates as an external fixator to treat tibial fractures have been reported. However, external locking plate fixation is still generally rarely performed. This study aimed to compare the stability of an external locking plate fixator with that of a conventional external fixator for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures using finite element analysis. METHODS: Three models were constructed: (1) external locking plate fixation of proximal tibial fracture with lateral proximal tibial locking plate and 5-mm screws (ELP), (2) conventional external fixation of proximal tibial fracture with an 11-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-11), and (3) conventional external fixation of a proximal tibial fracture with a 7-mm rod and 5-mm Schanz screws (EF-7). The stress distribution, displacement at the fracture gap, and stiffness of the three finite element models at 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-mm plate–rod offsets from the lateral surface of the lateral condyle of the tibia were determined. RESULTS: The conventional external fixator showed higher stiffness than the external locking plate fixator. In all models, the stiffness decreased as the distance of the plate–rod from the bone surface increased. The maximum stiffness was 121.06 N/mm in the EF-11 model with 30-mm tibia–rod offset. In the EF-7 model group, the maximum stiffness was 40.00 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia–rod offset. In the ELP model group, the maximum stiffness was 35.79 N/mm in the model with 30-mm tibia–plate offset. CONCLUSIONS: Finite element analysis indicated that external locking plate fixation is more flexible than conventional external fixation and can influence secondary bone healing. External locking plate fixation requires the placement of the plate as close as possible to the skin, which allows for a low-profile design because the increased distance from the plate to the bone can be too flexible for bone healing. Further experimental mechanical model tests are necessary to validate these finite element models, and further biological analysis is necessary to evaluate the effect of external locking plate fixation on fracture healing. BioMed Central 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8753923/ /pubmed/35016716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02907-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blažević, Dejan
Kodvanj, Janoš
Adamović, Petra
Vidović, Dinko
Trobonjača, Zlatko
Sabalić, Srećko
Comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis
title Comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis
title_full Comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis
title_short Comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis
title_sort comparison between external locking plate fixation and conventional external fixation for extraarticular proximal tibial fractures: a finite element analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8753923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35016716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02907-3
work_keys_str_mv AT blazevicdejan comparisonbetweenexternallockingplatefixationandconventionalexternalfixationforextraarticularproximaltibialfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT kodvanjjanos comparisonbetweenexternallockingplatefixationandconventionalexternalfixationforextraarticularproximaltibialfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT adamovicpetra comparisonbetweenexternallockingplatefixationandconventionalexternalfixationforextraarticularproximaltibialfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT vidovicdinko comparisonbetweenexternallockingplatefixationandconventionalexternalfixationforextraarticularproximaltibialfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT trobonjacazlatko comparisonbetweenexternallockingplatefixationandconventionalexternalfixationforextraarticularproximaltibialfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT sabalicsrecko comparisonbetweenexternallockingplatefixationandconventionalexternalfixationforextraarticularproximaltibialfracturesafiniteelementanalysis