Cargando…

Health care utilization following “digi-physical” assessment compared to physical assessment for infectious symptoms in primary care

BACKGROUND: The use of chat-based digital visits (eVisits) to assess infectious symptoms in primary care is rapidly increasing. The “digi-physical” model of care uses eVisits as the first line of assessment while assuming a certain proportion of patients will inevitably need to be further assessed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Entezarjou, Artin, Sjöbeck, Maria, Midlöv, Patrik, Nymberg, Veronica Milos, Vigren, Lina, Labaf, Ashkan, Jakobsson, Ulf, Calling, Susanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8753946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35036998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01618-2
_version_ 1784632177150918656
author Entezarjou, Artin
Sjöbeck, Maria
Midlöv, Patrik
Nymberg, Veronica Milos
Vigren, Lina
Labaf, Ashkan
Jakobsson, Ulf
Calling, Susanna
author_facet Entezarjou, Artin
Sjöbeck, Maria
Midlöv, Patrik
Nymberg, Veronica Milos
Vigren, Lina
Labaf, Ashkan
Jakobsson, Ulf
Calling, Susanna
author_sort Entezarjou, Artin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of chat-based digital visits (eVisits) to assess infectious symptoms in primary care is rapidly increasing. The “digi-physical” model of care uses eVisits as the first line of assessment while assuming a certain proportion of patients will inevitably need to be further assessed through urgent physical examination within 48 h. It is unclear to what extent this approach can mitigate physical visits compared to assessing patients directly using office visits. METHODS: This pre-COVID-19-pandemic observational study followed up “digi-physical” eVisit patients (n = 1188) compared to office visit patients (n = 599) with respiratory or urinary symptoms. Index visits occurred between March 30th 2016 and March 29th 2019. The primary outcome was subsequent physical visits to physicians within two weeks using registry data from Skåne county, Sweden (Region Skånes Vårddatabas, RSVD). RESULTS: No significant differences in subsequent physical visits within two weeks (excluding the first 48 h) were noted following “digi-physical” care compared to office visits (179 (18.0%) vs. 102 (17.6%), P = .854). As part of the “digital-physical” concept, a significantly larger proportion of eVisit patients had a physical visit within 48 h compared to corresponding office visit patients (191 (16.1%) vs. 19 (3.2%), P < .001), with 150 (78.5%) of these eVisit patients recommended some form of follow-up by the eVisit physician. CONCLUSIONS: Most eVisit patients (68.9%) with respiratory and urinary symptoms have no subsequent physical visits. Beyond an unavoidable portion of patients requiring urgent physical examination within 48 h, “digi-physical” management of respiratory and urinary symptoms results in comparable subsequent health care utilization compared to office visits. eVisit providers may need to optimize use of resources to minimize the proportion of patients being assessed both digitally and physically within 48 h as part of the “digi-physical” concept. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03474887. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01618-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8753946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87539462022-01-12 Health care utilization following “digi-physical” assessment compared to physical assessment for infectious symptoms in primary care Entezarjou, Artin Sjöbeck, Maria Midlöv, Patrik Nymberg, Veronica Milos Vigren, Lina Labaf, Ashkan Jakobsson, Ulf Calling, Susanna BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: The use of chat-based digital visits (eVisits) to assess infectious symptoms in primary care is rapidly increasing. The “digi-physical” model of care uses eVisits as the first line of assessment while assuming a certain proportion of patients will inevitably need to be further assessed through urgent physical examination within 48 h. It is unclear to what extent this approach can mitigate physical visits compared to assessing patients directly using office visits. METHODS: This pre-COVID-19-pandemic observational study followed up “digi-physical” eVisit patients (n = 1188) compared to office visit patients (n = 599) with respiratory or urinary symptoms. Index visits occurred between March 30th 2016 and March 29th 2019. The primary outcome was subsequent physical visits to physicians within two weeks using registry data from Skåne county, Sweden (Region Skånes Vårddatabas, RSVD). RESULTS: No significant differences in subsequent physical visits within two weeks (excluding the first 48 h) were noted following “digi-physical” care compared to office visits (179 (18.0%) vs. 102 (17.6%), P = .854). As part of the “digital-physical” concept, a significantly larger proportion of eVisit patients had a physical visit within 48 h compared to corresponding office visit patients (191 (16.1%) vs. 19 (3.2%), P < .001), with 150 (78.5%) of these eVisit patients recommended some form of follow-up by the eVisit physician. CONCLUSIONS: Most eVisit patients (68.9%) with respiratory and urinary symptoms have no subsequent physical visits. Beyond an unavoidable portion of patients requiring urgent physical examination within 48 h, “digi-physical” management of respiratory and urinary symptoms results in comparable subsequent health care utilization compared to office visits. eVisit providers may need to optimize use of resources to minimize the proportion of patients being assessed both digitally and physically within 48 h as part of the “digi-physical” concept. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03474887. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01618-2. BioMed Central 2022-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8753946/ /pubmed/35036998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01618-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Entezarjou, Artin
Sjöbeck, Maria
Midlöv, Patrik
Nymberg, Veronica Milos
Vigren, Lina
Labaf, Ashkan
Jakobsson, Ulf
Calling, Susanna
Health care utilization following “digi-physical” assessment compared to physical assessment for infectious symptoms in primary care
title Health care utilization following “digi-physical” assessment compared to physical assessment for infectious symptoms in primary care
title_full Health care utilization following “digi-physical” assessment compared to physical assessment for infectious symptoms in primary care
title_fullStr Health care utilization following “digi-physical” assessment compared to physical assessment for infectious symptoms in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Health care utilization following “digi-physical” assessment compared to physical assessment for infectious symptoms in primary care
title_short Health care utilization following “digi-physical” assessment compared to physical assessment for infectious symptoms in primary care
title_sort health care utilization following “digi-physical” assessment compared to physical assessment for infectious symptoms in primary care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8753946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35036998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01618-2
work_keys_str_mv AT entezarjouartin healthcareutilizationfollowingdigiphysicalassessmentcomparedtophysicalassessmentforinfectioussymptomsinprimarycare
AT sjobeckmaria healthcareutilizationfollowingdigiphysicalassessmentcomparedtophysicalassessmentforinfectioussymptomsinprimarycare
AT midlovpatrik healthcareutilizationfollowingdigiphysicalassessmentcomparedtophysicalassessmentforinfectioussymptomsinprimarycare
AT nymbergveronicamilos healthcareutilizationfollowingdigiphysicalassessmentcomparedtophysicalassessmentforinfectioussymptomsinprimarycare
AT vigrenlina healthcareutilizationfollowingdigiphysicalassessmentcomparedtophysicalassessmentforinfectioussymptomsinprimarycare
AT labafashkan healthcareutilizationfollowingdigiphysicalassessmentcomparedtophysicalassessmentforinfectioussymptomsinprimarycare
AT jakobssonulf healthcareutilizationfollowingdigiphysicalassessmentcomparedtophysicalassessmentforinfectioussymptomsinprimarycare
AT callingsusanna healthcareutilizationfollowingdigiphysicalassessmentcomparedtophysicalassessmentforinfectioussymptomsinprimarycare