Cargando…

Corneal Biomechanics for Ocular Hypertension, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, and Amyloidotic Glaucoma: A Comparative Study by Corvis ST

BACKGROUND: To evaluate biomechanical parameters of the cornea provided by Corvis ST in patients with ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and amyloidotic glaucoma and to compare with healthy controls. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with ocular hypertension, prima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, Nisa, Ferreira, André, Baptista, Pedro Manuel, Figueiredo, Ana, Reis, Rita, Sampaio, Isabel, Beirão, João, Vinciguerra, Riccardo, Menéres, Pedro, Menéres, Maria João
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8754459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035215
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S350029
_version_ 1784632276653441024
author Silva, Nisa
Ferreira, André
Baptista, Pedro Manuel
Figueiredo, Ana
Reis, Rita
Sampaio, Isabel
Beirão, João
Vinciguerra, Riccardo
Menéres, Pedro
Menéres, Maria João
author_facet Silva, Nisa
Ferreira, André
Baptista, Pedro Manuel
Figueiredo, Ana
Reis, Rita
Sampaio, Isabel
Beirão, João
Vinciguerra, Riccardo
Menéres, Pedro
Menéres, Maria João
author_sort Silva, Nisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate biomechanical parameters of the cornea provided by Corvis ST in patients with ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and amyloidotic glaucoma and to compare with healthy controls. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and amyloidotic glaucoma that underwent Corvis ST imaging. Primary outcome was the comparison of corneal biomechanical parameters between study groups after adjusting for age, gender, Goldmann intraocular pressure (GAT-IOP), and prostaglandin analogues medication. Secondary outcome was the comparison of different IOP measurements in each group. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-three eyes from 115 patients were included: 61 with primary open-angle glaucoma, 32 with amyloidotic glaucoma, 37 with ocular hypertension and 53 were healthy controls. Amyloidotic glaucoma group had smaller radius (p=0.025), lower deflection amplitude at highest concavity (p=0.019), and higher integrated radius (p=0.014) than controls. Ocular hypertension group had higher stiffness parameter at first applanation (p=0.043) than those with primary open-angle glaucoma, and higher stress–strain index (p=0.049) than those with amyloidotic glaucoma. Biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure was significantly lower than Goldmann intraocular pressure in group with primary open-angle glaucoma (p=0.005) and control group (p=0.013), and Goldmann intraocular pressure adjusted for pachymetry in group with primary open-angle glaucoma (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Eyes with amyloidotic glaucoma have more deformable corneas, while eyes with ocular hypertension have less deformable corneas. These findings may be linked to the susceptibility to glaucomatous damage and progression. There were significant differences between Goldmann applanation tonometry and biomechanically corrected intraocular ocular pressure provided by Corvis ST.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8754459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87544592022-01-13 Corneal Biomechanics for Ocular Hypertension, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, and Amyloidotic Glaucoma: A Comparative Study by Corvis ST Silva, Nisa Ferreira, André Baptista, Pedro Manuel Figueiredo, Ana Reis, Rita Sampaio, Isabel Beirão, João Vinciguerra, Riccardo Menéres, Pedro Menéres, Maria João Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate biomechanical parameters of the cornea provided by Corvis ST in patients with ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and amyloidotic glaucoma and to compare with healthy controls. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and amyloidotic glaucoma that underwent Corvis ST imaging. Primary outcome was the comparison of corneal biomechanical parameters between study groups after adjusting for age, gender, Goldmann intraocular pressure (GAT-IOP), and prostaglandin analogues medication. Secondary outcome was the comparison of different IOP measurements in each group. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-three eyes from 115 patients were included: 61 with primary open-angle glaucoma, 32 with amyloidotic glaucoma, 37 with ocular hypertension and 53 were healthy controls. Amyloidotic glaucoma group had smaller radius (p=0.025), lower deflection amplitude at highest concavity (p=0.019), and higher integrated radius (p=0.014) than controls. Ocular hypertension group had higher stiffness parameter at first applanation (p=0.043) than those with primary open-angle glaucoma, and higher stress–strain index (p=0.049) than those with amyloidotic glaucoma. Biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure was significantly lower than Goldmann intraocular pressure in group with primary open-angle glaucoma (p=0.005) and control group (p=0.013), and Goldmann intraocular pressure adjusted for pachymetry in group with primary open-angle glaucoma (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Eyes with amyloidotic glaucoma have more deformable corneas, while eyes with ocular hypertension have less deformable corneas. These findings may be linked to the susceptibility to glaucomatous damage and progression. There were significant differences between Goldmann applanation tonometry and biomechanically corrected intraocular ocular pressure provided by Corvis ST. Dove 2022-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8754459/ /pubmed/35035215 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S350029 Text en © 2022 Silva et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Silva, Nisa
Ferreira, André
Baptista, Pedro Manuel
Figueiredo, Ana
Reis, Rita
Sampaio, Isabel
Beirão, João
Vinciguerra, Riccardo
Menéres, Pedro
Menéres, Maria João
Corneal Biomechanics for Ocular Hypertension, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, and Amyloidotic Glaucoma: A Comparative Study by Corvis ST
title Corneal Biomechanics for Ocular Hypertension, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, and Amyloidotic Glaucoma: A Comparative Study by Corvis ST
title_full Corneal Biomechanics for Ocular Hypertension, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, and Amyloidotic Glaucoma: A Comparative Study by Corvis ST
title_fullStr Corneal Biomechanics for Ocular Hypertension, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, and Amyloidotic Glaucoma: A Comparative Study by Corvis ST
title_full_unstemmed Corneal Biomechanics for Ocular Hypertension, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, and Amyloidotic Glaucoma: A Comparative Study by Corvis ST
title_short Corneal Biomechanics for Ocular Hypertension, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, and Amyloidotic Glaucoma: A Comparative Study by Corvis ST
title_sort corneal biomechanics for ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and amyloidotic glaucoma: a comparative study by corvis st
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8754459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035215
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S350029
work_keys_str_mv AT silvanisa cornealbiomechanicsforocularhypertensionprimaryopenangleglaucomaandamyloidoticglaucomaacomparativestudybycorvisst
AT ferreiraandre cornealbiomechanicsforocularhypertensionprimaryopenangleglaucomaandamyloidoticglaucomaacomparativestudybycorvisst
AT baptistapedromanuel cornealbiomechanicsforocularhypertensionprimaryopenangleglaucomaandamyloidoticglaucomaacomparativestudybycorvisst
AT figueiredoana cornealbiomechanicsforocularhypertensionprimaryopenangleglaucomaandamyloidoticglaucomaacomparativestudybycorvisst
AT reisrita cornealbiomechanicsforocularhypertensionprimaryopenangleglaucomaandamyloidoticglaucomaacomparativestudybycorvisst
AT sampaioisabel cornealbiomechanicsforocularhypertensionprimaryopenangleglaucomaandamyloidoticglaucomaacomparativestudybycorvisst
AT beiraojoao cornealbiomechanicsforocularhypertensionprimaryopenangleglaucomaandamyloidoticglaucomaacomparativestudybycorvisst
AT vinciguerrariccardo cornealbiomechanicsforocularhypertensionprimaryopenangleglaucomaandamyloidoticglaucomaacomparativestudybycorvisst
AT menerespedro cornealbiomechanicsforocularhypertensionprimaryopenangleglaucomaandamyloidoticglaucomaacomparativestudybycorvisst
AT meneresmariajoao cornealbiomechanicsforocularhypertensionprimaryopenangleglaucomaandamyloidoticglaucomaacomparativestudybycorvisst