The Diagnostic Accuracy of Xpert Xpress to SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review

The SARS-CoV-2 infection rate, as well as mortality rate, is high. There is an urgent need for a high-throughput, accurate and reliable method of diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia. We included references from databases, such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase, and extracted data. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Xun-Jie, Fang, Ke-Ying, Li, Ya-Ping, Zhou, Jie, Guo, Xu-Guang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8754461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35032480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2022.114460
Descripción
Sumario:The SARS-CoV-2 infection rate, as well as mortality rate, is high. There is an urgent need for a high-throughput, accurate and reliable method of diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia. We included references from databases, such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase, and extracted data. Then, MetaDisc and STATA were used to establish forest plots and funnel plots for meta-analysis. We collected 14 articles and performed a systematic review. The following results were obtained: sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 (0.96 to 0.98) and 0.97 (0.96 to 0.98) respectively; PLR and NLR were 24.51 (16.63–36.12) and 0.03 (0.01 to 0.10) respectively, DOR was 975.15 (430.11–2210.88), and AUC was 0.9926. When Xpress detects SARS-CoV-2 in different samples, the heterogeneity is small and the specificity and sensitivity are extremely high. We recommend the employment of Xpert Xpress analysis in rapid screening.

Ejemplares similares