Cargando…

Using artificial intelligence to risk stratify COVID-19 patients based on chest X-ray findings

BACKGROUND: Deep learning-based radiological image analysis could facilitate use of chest x-rays as a triaging tool for COVID-19 diagnosis in resource-limited settings. This study sought to determine whether a modified commercially available deep learning algorithm (M-qXR) could risk stratify patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hipolito Canario, Diego A., Fromke, Eric, Patetta, Matthew A., Eltilib, Mohamed T., Reyes-Gonzalez, Juan P., Rodriguez, Georgina Cornelio, Fusco Cornejo, Valeria A., Duncker, Seymour, Stewart, Jessica K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8755446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmed.2022.100049
_version_ 1784632383470829568
author Hipolito Canario, Diego A.
Fromke, Eric
Patetta, Matthew A.
Eltilib, Mohamed T.
Reyes-Gonzalez, Juan P.
Rodriguez, Georgina Cornelio
Fusco Cornejo, Valeria A.
Duncker, Seymour
Stewart, Jessica K.
author_facet Hipolito Canario, Diego A.
Fromke, Eric
Patetta, Matthew A.
Eltilib, Mohamed T.
Reyes-Gonzalez, Juan P.
Rodriguez, Georgina Cornelio
Fusco Cornejo, Valeria A.
Duncker, Seymour
Stewart, Jessica K.
author_sort Hipolito Canario, Diego A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep learning-based radiological image analysis could facilitate use of chest x-rays as a triaging tool for COVID-19 diagnosis in resource-limited settings. This study sought to determine whether a modified commercially available deep learning algorithm (M-qXR) could risk stratify patients with suspected COVID-19 infections. METHODS: A dual track clinical validation study was designed to assess the clinical accuracy of M-qXR. The algorithm evaluated all Chest-X-rays (CXRs) performed during the study period for abnormal findings and assigned a COVID-19 risk score. Four independent radiologists served as radiological ground truth. The M-qXR algorithm output was compared against radiological ground truth and summary statistics for prediction accuracy were calculated. In addition, patients who underwent both PCR testing and CXR for suspected COVID-19 infection were included in a co-occurrence matrix to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the M-qXR algorithm. RESULTS: 625 CXRs were included in the clinical validation study. 98% of total interpretations made by M-qXR agreed with ground truth (p = 0.25). M-qXR correctly identified the presence or absence of pulmonary opacities in 94% of CXR interpretations. M-qXR's sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for detecting pulmonary opacities were 94%, 95%, 99%, and 88% respectively. M-qXR correctly identified the presence or absence of pulmonary consolidation in 88% of CXR interpretations (p = 0.48). M-qXR's sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for detecting pulmonary consolidation were 91%, 84%, 89%, and 86% respectively. Furthermore, 113 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases were used to create a co-occurrence matrix between M-qXR's COVID-19 risk score and COVID-19 PCR test results. The PPV and NPV of a medium to high COVID-19 risk score assigned by M-qXR yielding a positive COVID-19 PCR test result was estimated to be 89.7% and 80.4% respectively. CONCLUSION: M-qXR was found to have comparable accuracy to radiological ground truth in detecting radiographic abnormalities on CXR suggestive of COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8755446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87554462022-01-13 Using artificial intelligence to risk stratify COVID-19 patients based on chest X-ray findings Hipolito Canario, Diego A. Fromke, Eric Patetta, Matthew A. Eltilib, Mohamed T. Reyes-Gonzalez, Juan P. Rodriguez, Georgina Cornelio Fusco Cornejo, Valeria A. Duncker, Seymour Stewart, Jessica K. Intell Based Med Article BACKGROUND: Deep learning-based radiological image analysis could facilitate use of chest x-rays as a triaging tool for COVID-19 diagnosis in resource-limited settings. This study sought to determine whether a modified commercially available deep learning algorithm (M-qXR) could risk stratify patients with suspected COVID-19 infections. METHODS: A dual track clinical validation study was designed to assess the clinical accuracy of M-qXR. The algorithm evaluated all Chest-X-rays (CXRs) performed during the study period for abnormal findings and assigned a COVID-19 risk score. Four independent radiologists served as radiological ground truth. The M-qXR algorithm output was compared against radiological ground truth and summary statistics for prediction accuracy were calculated. In addition, patients who underwent both PCR testing and CXR for suspected COVID-19 infection were included in a co-occurrence matrix to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the M-qXR algorithm. RESULTS: 625 CXRs were included in the clinical validation study. 98% of total interpretations made by M-qXR agreed with ground truth (p = 0.25). M-qXR correctly identified the presence or absence of pulmonary opacities in 94% of CXR interpretations. M-qXR's sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for detecting pulmonary opacities were 94%, 95%, 99%, and 88% respectively. M-qXR correctly identified the presence or absence of pulmonary consolidation in 88% of CXR interpretations (p = 0.48). M-qXR's sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for detecting pulmonary consolidation were 91%, 84%, 89%, and 86% respectively. Furthermore, 113 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases were used to create a co-occurrence matrix between M-qXR's COVID-19 risk score and COVID-19 PCR test results. The PPV and NPV of a medium to high COVID-19 risk score assigned by M-qXR yielding a positive COVID-19 PCR test result was estimated to be 89.7% and 80.4% respectively. CONCLUSION: M-qXR was found to have comparable accuracy to radiological ground truth in detecting radiographic abnormalities on CXR suggestive of COVID-19. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8755446/ /pubmed/35039806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmed.2022.100049 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Hipolito Canario, Diego A.
Fromke, Eric
Patetta, Matthew A.
Eltilib, Mohamed T.
Reyes-Gonzalez, Juan P.
Rodriguez, Georgina Cornelio
Fusco Cornejo, Valeria A.
Duncker, Seymour
Stewart, Jessica K.
Using artificial intelligence to risk stratify COVID-19 patients based on chest X-ray findings
title Using artificial intelligence to risk stratify COVID-19 patients based on chest X-ray findings
title_full Using artificial intelligence to risk stratify COVID-19 patients based on chest X-ray findings
title_fullStr Using artificial intelligence to risk stratify COVID-19 patients based on chest X-ray findings
title_full_unstemmed Using artificial intelligence to risk stratify COVID-19 patients based on chest X-ray findings
title_short Using artificial intelligence to risk stratify COVID-19 patients based on chest X-ray findings
title_sort using artificial intelligence to risk stratify covid-19 patients based on chest x-ray findings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8755446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmed.2022.100049
work_keys_str_mv AT hipolitocanariodiegoa usingartificialintelligencetoriskstratifycovid19patientsbasedonchestxrayfindings
AT fromkeeric usingartificialintelligencetoriskstratifycovid19patientsbasedonchestxrayfindings
AT patettamatthewa usingartificialintelligencetoriskstratifycovid19patientsbasedonchestxrayfindings
AT eltilibmohamedt usingartificialintelligencetoriskstratifycovid19patientsbasedonchestxrayfindings
AT reyesgonzalezjuanp usingartificialintelligencetoriskstratifycovid19patientsbasedonchestxrayfindings
AT rodriguezgeorginacornelio usingartificialintelligencetoriskstratifycovid19patientsbasedonchestxrayfindings
AT fuscocornejovaleriaa usingartificialintelligencetoriskstratifycovid19patientsbasedonchestxrayfindings
AT dunckerseymour usingartificialintelligencetoriskstratifycovid19patientsbasedonchestxrayfindings
AT stewartjessicak usingartificialintelligencetoriskstratifycovid19patientsbasedonchestxrayfindings