Cargando…

Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 vs Physician’s Choice of Therapy in the Long-Term Follow-Up of POLLUX, CASTOR, and EQUULEUS Clinical Trials for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a novel agent being investigated in the single-arm CARTITUDE-1 trial (NCT03548207) for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who are triple-class exposed to an immunomodulatory drug, proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weisel, Katja, Martin, Thomas, Krishnan, Amrita, Jagannath, Sundar, Londhe, Anil, Nair, Sandhya, Diels, Joris, Vogel, Martin, Schecter, Jordan M., Banerjee, Arnob, Berdeja, Jesus G., Nesheiwat, Tonia, Garrett, Ashraf, Qi, Keqin, Valluri, Satish, Usmani, Saad Z., Yong, Kwee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8755696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01100-y
_version_ 1784632423959494656
author Weisel, Katja
Martin, Thomas
Krishnan, Amrita
Jagannath, Sundar
Londhe, Anil
Nair, Sandhya
Diels, Joris
Vogel, Martin
Schecter, Jordan M.
Banerjee, Arnob
Berdeja, Jesus G.
Nesheiwat, Tonia
Garrett, Ashraf
Qi, Keqin
Valluri, Satish
Usmani, Saad Z.
Yong, Kwee
author_facet Weisel, Katja
Martin, Thomas
Krishnan, Amrita
Jagannath, Sundar
Londhe, Anil
Nair, Sandhya
Diels, Joris
Vogel, Martin
Schecter, Jordan M.
Banerjee, Arnob
Berdeja, Jesus G.
Nesheiwat, Tonia
Garrett, Ashraf
Qi, Keqin
Valluri, Satish
Usmani, Saad Z.
Yong, Kwee
author_sort Weisel, Katja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a novel agent being investigated in the single-arm CARTITUDE-1 trial (NCT03548207) for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who are triple-class exposed to an immunomodulatory drug, proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. The objective of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of cilta-cel vs physician’s choice of treatment, as no head-to-head trials have been conducted. METHODS: An external control arm for CARTITUDE-1 was created from patients in the long-term follow-up for three clinical trials of daratumumab (POLLUX, CASTOR, and EQUULEUS) who satisfied the eligibility criteria of CARTITUDE-1. These patients received physician’s choice of treatment following the discontinuation of study drugs. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to align the external control and CARTITUDE-1 populations on important baseline characteristics. Overall response rate, complete response or better rate, progression-free survival, time to next treatment, and overall survival were assessed. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: After propensity score weighting, baseline characteristics were comparable between cohorts. Patients showed improved results with cilta-cel vs physician’s choice of treatment: overall response rate (relative risk: 2.95 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.27, 3.84; p < 0.0001]), complete response or better (relative risk: 111.70 [95% CI 29.08, 429.06; p < 0.0001]), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24 [95% CI 0.15, 0.37; p < 0.0001]), time to next treatment (HR: 0.14 [95% CI 0.09, 0.22; p < 0.0001]), and overall survival (HR: 0.21 [95% CI 0.13, 0.35; p < 0.0001]). Results were consistent across all sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Cilta-cel showed superior efficacy compared with physician’s choice of treatment, making it a promising new treatment option for patients with triple-class exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-021-01100-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8755696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87556962022-01-20 Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 vs Physician’s Choice of Therapy in the Long-Term Follow-Up of POLLUX, CASTOR, and EQUULEUS Clinical Trials for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Weisel, Katja Martin, Thomas Krishnan, Amrita Jagannath, Sundar Londhe, Anil Nair, Sandhya Diels, Joris Vogel, Martin Schecter, Jordan M. Banerjee, Arnob Berdeja, Jesus G. Nesheiwat, Tonia Garrett, Ashraf Qi, Keqin Valluri, Satish Usmani, Saad Z. Yong, Kwee Clin Drug Investig Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a novel agent being investigated in the single-arm CARTITUDE-1 trial (NCT03548207) for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who are triple-class exposed to an immunomodulatory drug, proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. The objective of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of cilta-cel vs physician’s choice of treatment, as no head-to-head trials have been conducted. METHODS: An external control arm for CARTITUDE-1 was created from patients in the long-term follow-up for three clinical trials of daratumumab (POLLUX, CASTOR, and EQUULEUS) who satisfied the eligibility criteria of CARTITUDE-1. These patients received physician’s choice of treatment following the discontinuation of study drugs. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to align the external control and CARTITUDE-1 populations on important baseline characteristics. Overall response rate, complete response or better rate, progression-free survival, time to next treatment, and overall survival were assessed. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: After propensity score weighting, baseline characteristics were comparable between cohorts. Patients showed improved results with cilta-cel vs physician’s choice of treatment: overall response rate (relative risk: 2.95 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.27, 3.84; p < 0.0001]), complete response or better (relative risk: 111.70 [95% CI 29.08, 429.06; p < 0.0001]), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24 [95% CI 0.15, 0.37; p < 0.0001]), time to next treatment (HR: 0.14 [95% CI 0.09, 0.22; p < 0.0001]), and overall survival (HR: 0.21 [95% CI 0.13, 0.35; p < 0.0001]). Results were consistent across all sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Cilta-cel showed superior efficacy compared with physician’s choice of treatment, making it a promising new treatment option for patients with triple-class exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-021-01100-y. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8755696/ /pubmed/34822128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01100-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Weisel, Katja
Martin, Thomas
Krishnan, Amrita
Jagannath, Sundar
Londhe, Anil
Nair, Sandhya
Diels, Joris
Vogel, Martin
Schecter, Jordan M.
Banerjee, Arnob
Berdeja, Jesus G.
Nesheiwat, Tonia
Garrett, Ashraf
Qi, Keqin
Valluri, Satish
Usmani, Saad Z.
Yong, Kwee
Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 vs Physician’s Choice of Therapy in the Long-Term Follow-Up of POLLUX, CASTOR, and EQUULEUS Clinical Trials for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
title Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 vs Physician’s Choice of Therapy in the Long-Term Follow-Up of POLLUX, CASTOR, and EQUULEUS Clinical Trials for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
title_full Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 vs Physician’s Choice of Therapy in the Long-Term Follow-Up of POLLUX, CASTOR, and EQUULEUS Clinical Trials for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 vs Physician’s Choice of Therapy in the Long-Term Follow-Up of POLLUX, CASTOR, and EQUULEUS Clinical Trials for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 vs Physician’s Choice of Therapy in the Long-Term Follow-Up of POLLUX, CASTOR, and EQUULEUS Clinical Trials for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
title_short Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 vs Physician’s Choice of Therapy in the Long-Term Follow-Up of POLLUX, CASTOR, and EQUULEUS Clinical Trials for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
title_sort comparative efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel in cartitude-1 vs physician’s choice of therapy in the long-term follow-up of pollux, castor, and equuleus clinical trials for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8755696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01100-y
work_keys_str_mv AT weiselkatja comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT martinthomas comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT krishnanamrita comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT jagannathsundar comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT londheanil comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT nairsandhya comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT dielsjoris comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT vogelmartin comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT schecterjordanm comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT banerjeearnob comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT berdejajesusg comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT nesheiwattonia comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT garrettashraf comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT qikeqin comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT vallurisatish comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT usmanisaadz comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT yongkwee comparativeefficacyofciltacabtageneautoleucelincartitude1vsphysicianschoiceoftherapyinthelongtermfollowupofpolluxcastorandequuleusclinicaltrialsforthetreatmentofpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma