Cargando…

Risk Factors for Tracheostomy after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A 10‐Year Study of 456 Patients

OBJECTIVES: To explore the difference between tracheostomy and non‐tracheostomy and identify the risk factors associated with the need for tracheostomy after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (TCSCI). METHODS: The demographic and injury characteristics of 456 TCSCI patients, treated in the Xinqi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Long, Ping‐ping, Sun, Da‐wei, Zhang, Zheng‐feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8755884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34812567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13172
_version_ 1784632466086035456
author Long, Ping‐ping
Sun, Da‐wei
Zhang, Zheng‐feng
author_facet Long, Ping‐ping
Sun, Da‐wei
Zhang, Zheng‐feng
author_sort Long, Ping‐ping
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore the difference between tracheostomy and non‐tracheostomy and identify the risk factors associated with the need for tracheostomy after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (TCSCI). METHODS: The demographic and injury characteristics of 456 TCSCI patients, treated in the Xinqiao Hospital from 2010 to 2019, were retrospective analyzed. Patients were divided into the tracheostomy group (n = 63) and the non‐tracheostomy group (n = 393). Variables included were age, gender,smoking history, mechanism of injury, concomitant injury, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, the neurological level of injury, Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score (CSISS), surgery, and length of stay in ICU and hospital. SPSS 25.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis and ROC curve drawing. Chi‐square analysis was applied to find out the difference of variables between the tracheostomy and non‐tracheostomy groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis (ULRA) and multiple logistic regression analysis (MLRA) were used to identify risk factors for tracheostomy. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of these risk factors. RESULTS: Of 456 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 63 (13.8%) underwent tracheostomy. There were differences in age (χ(2) = 6.615, P = 0.032), mechanism of injury (χ(2) = 9.87, P = 0.036), concomitant injury (χ(2) = 6.131, P = 0.013),ASIA Impairment Scale (χ(2) = 123.08, P < 0.01), the neurological level of injury (χ(2) = 34.74, P < 0.01), and CSISS (χ(2) = 19.612, P < 0.01) between the tracheostomy and non‐tracheostomy groups. Smoking history, CSISS ≥ 7, AIS A and, NLI ≥ C5 were identified as potential risk factors for tracheostomy by ULRA. Smoking history (OR = 2.960, 95% CI: 1.524–5.750, P = 0.001), CSISS ≥ 7 (OR = 4.599, 95% CI: 2.328–9.085, P = 0.000), AIS A (OR = 14.213, 95% CI: 6.720–30.060, P = 0.000) and NLI ≥ C5 (OR = 8.312, 95% CI: 1.935–35.711, P = 0.004) as risk factors for tracheostomy were determined by MLRA. The AUC for the risk factors of tracheostomy after TCSCI was 0.858 (95% CI: 0.810–0.907). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking history, CSISS ≥ 7, AIS A and, NLI ≥ C5 were identified as risk factors needing of tracheostomy in patients with TCSCI. These risk factors may be important to assist the clinical decision of tracheostomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8755884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87558842022-01-19 Risk Factors for Tracheostomy after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A 10‐Year Study of 456 Patients Long, Ping‐ping Sun, Da‐wei Zhang, Zheng‐feng Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVES: To explore the difference between tracheostomy and non‐tracheostomy and identify the risk factors associated with the need for tracheostomy after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (TCSCI). METHODS: The demographic and injury characteristics of 456 TCSCI patients, treated in the Xinqiao Hospital from 2010 to 2019, were retrospective analyzed. Patients were divided into the tracheostomy group (n = 63) and the non‐tracheostomy group (n = 393). Variables included were age, gender,smoking history, mechanism of injury, concomitant injury, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, the neurological level of injury, Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score (CSISS), surgery, and length of stay in ICU and hospital. SPSS 25.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis and ROC curve drawing. Chi‐square analysis was applied to find out the difference of variables between the tracheostomy and non‐tracheostomy groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis (ULRA) and multiple logistic regression analysis (MLRA) were used to identify risk factors for tracheostomy. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of these risk factors. RESULTS: Of 456 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 63 (13.8%) underwent tracheostomy. There were differences in age (χ(2) = 6.615, P = 0.032), mechanism of injury (χ(2) = 9.87, P = 0.036), concomitant injury (χ(2) = 6.131, P = 0.013),ASIA Impairment Scale (χ(2) = 123.08, P < 0.01), the neurological level of injury (χ(2) = 34.74, P < 0.01), and CSISS (χ(2) = 19.612, P < 0.01) between the tracheostomy and non‐tracheostomy groups. Smoking history, CSISS ≥ 7, AIS A and, NLI ≥ C5 were identified as potential risk factors for tracheostomy by ULRA. Smoking history (OR = 2.960, 95% CI: 1.524–5.750, P = 0.001), CSISS ≥ 7 (OR = 4.599, 95% CI: 2.328–9.085, P = 0.000), AIS A (OR = 14.213, 95% CI: 6.720–30.060, P = 0.000) and NLI ≥ C5 (OR = 8.312, 95% CI: 1.935–35.711, P = 0.004) as risk factors for tracheostomy were determined by MLRA. The AUC for the risk factors of tracheostomy after TCSCI was 0.858 (95% CI: 0.810–0.907). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking history, CSISS ≥ 7, AIS A and, NLI ≥ C5 were identified as risk factors needing of tracheostomy in patients with TCSCI. These risk factors may be important to assist the clinical decision of tracheostomy. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8755884/ /pubmed/34812567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13172 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Long, Ping‐ping
Sun, Da‐wei
Zhang, Zheng‐feng
Risk Factors for Tracheostomy after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A 10‐Year Study of 456 Patients
title Risk Factors for Tracheostomy after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A 10‐Year Study of 456 Patients
title_full Risk Factors for Tracheostomy after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A 10‐Year Study of 456 Patients
title_fullStr Risk Factors for Tracheostomy after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A 10‐Year Study of 456 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors for Tracheostomy after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A 10‐Year Study of 456 Patients
title_short Risk Factors for Tracheostomy after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A 10‐Year Study of 456 Patients
title_sort risk factors for tracheostomy after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a 10‐year study of 456 patients
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8755884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34812567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13172
work_keys_str_mv AT longpingping riskfactorsfortracheostomyaftertraumaticcervicalspinalcordinjurya10yearstudyof456patients
AT sundawei riskfactorsfortracheostomyaftertraumaticcervicalspinalcordinjurya10yearstudyof456patients
AT zhangzhengfeng riskfactorsfortracheostomyaftertraumaticcervicalspinalcordinjurya10yearstudyof456patients