Cargando…

Methodological problems of SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care tests when used in mass testing

The aim of the current study is to perform model calculations on the possible use of SARS-CoV-2-rapid point-of-care tests as mass tests, using the quality criteria extracted from evidence-based research as an example for the Federal Republic of Germany. In addition to illustrating the problem of fal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirsch, Oliver, Bergholz, Werner, Kisielinski, Kai, Giboni, Paul, Sönnichsen, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AIMS Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8755956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071670
http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2022007
_version_ 1784632477638197248
author Hirsch, Oliver
Bergholz, Werner
Kisielinski, Kai
Giboni, Paul
Sönnichsen, Andreas
author_facet Hirsch, Oliver
Bergholz, Werner
Kisielinski, Kai
Giboni, Paul
Sönnichsen, Andreas
author_sort Hirsch, Oliver
collection PubMed
description The aim of the current study is to perform model calculations on the possible use of SARS-CoV-2-rapid point-of-care tests as mass tests, using the quality criteria extracted from evidence-based research as an example for the Federal Republic of Germany. In addition to illustrating the problem of false positive test results, these calculations are used to examine their possible influence on the 7-day incidence. For a substantial period of time, this parameter formed the decisive basis for decisions on measures to protect the population in the wake of the COVID pandemic, which were taken by the government. Primarily, model calculations were performed for a base model of 1,000,000 SARS-CoV-2-rapid point-of-care tests per week using various sensitivities and specificities reported in the literature, followed by sequential testing of the test positives obtained by a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. Furthermore, a calculation was performed for an actual maximum model based on self-test contingents by the German Federal Ministry of Health. Assuming a number of 1,000,000 tests per week at a prevalence of 0.5%, a high number of false positive test results, a low positive predictive value, a high negative predictive value, and an increase in the 7-day incidence due to the additional antigen rapid tests of approx. 5/100,000 were obtained. A previous maximum calculation based on contingent numbers for self-tests given by the German Federal Ministry of Health even showed an additional possible influence on the 7-day incidence of 84.6/100,000. The model calculations refer in each case to representative population samples that would have to be drawn if the successive results were comparable which should be given, as far-reaching actions were based on this parameter. The additionally performed SARS-CoV-2-rapid point-of-care tests increase the 7-day incidence in a clear way depending on the number of tests and clearly show their dependence on the respective number of tests. SARS-CoV-2-rapid point-of-care tests as well as the SARS-CoV-2-PCR test method should both be used exclusively in the presence of corresponding respiratory symptoms and not in symptom-free persons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8755956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AIMS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87559562022-01-20 Methodological problems of SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care tests when used in mass testing Hirsch, Oliver Bergholz, Werner Kisielinski, Kai Giboni, Paul Sönnichsen, Andreas AIMS Public Health Research Article The aim of the current study is to perform model calculations on the possible use of SARS-CoV-2-rapid point-of-care tests as mass tests, using the quality criteria extracted from evidence-based research as an example for the Federal Republic of Germany. In addition to illustrating the problem of false positive test results, these calculations are used to examine their possible influence on the 7-day incidence. For a substantial period of time, this parameter formed the decisive basis for decisions on measures to protect the population in the wake of the COVID pandemic, which were taken by the government. Primarily, model calculations were performed for a base model of 1,000,000 SARS-CoV-2-rapid point-of-care tests per week using various sensitivities and specificities reported in the literature, followed by sequential testing of the test positives obtained by a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. Furthermore, a calculation was performed for an actual maximum model based on self-test contingents by the German Federal Ministry of Health. Assuming a number of 1,000,000 tests per week at a prevalence of 0.5%, a high number of false positive test results, a low positive predictive value, a high negative predictive value, and an increase in the 7-day incidence due to the additional antigen rapid tests of approx. 5/100,000 were obtained. A previous maximum calculation based on contingent numbers for self-tests given by the German Federal Ministry of Health even showed an additional possible influence on the 7-day incidence of 84.6/100,000. The model calculations refer in each case to representative population samples that would have to be drawn if the successive results were comparable which should be given, as far-reaching actions were based on this parameter. The additionally performed SARS-CoV-2-rapid point-of-care tests increase the 7-day incidence in a clear way depending on the number of tests and clearly show their dependence on the respective number of tests. SARS-CoV-2-rapid point-of-care tests as well as the SARS-CoV-2-PCR test method should both be used exclusively in the presence of corresponding respiratory symptoms and not in symptom-free persons. AIMS Press 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8755956/ /pubmed/35071670 http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2022007 Text en © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Research Article
Hirsch, Oliver
Bergholz, Werner
Kisielinski, Kai
Giboni, Paul
Sönnichsen, Andreas
Methodological problems of SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care tests when used in mass testing
title Methodological problems of SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care tests when used in mass testing
title_full Methodological problems of SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care tests when used in mass testing
title_fullStr Methodological problems of SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care tests when used in mass testing
title_full_unstemmed Methodological problems of SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care tests when used in mass testing
title_short Methodological problems of SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care tests when used in mass testing
title_sort methodological problems of sars-cov-2 rapid point-of-care tests when used in mass testing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8755956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071670
http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2022007
work_keys_str_mv AT hirscholiver methodologicalproblemsofsarscov2rapidpointofcaretestswhenusedinmasstesting
AT bergholzwerner methodologicalproblemsofsarscov2rapidpointofcaretestswhenusedinmasstesting
AT kisielinskikai methodologicalproblemsofsarscov2rapidpointofcaretestswhenusedinmasstesting
AT gibonipaul methodologicalproblemsofsarscov2rapidpointofcaretestswhenusedinmasstesting
AT sonnichsenandreas methodologicalproblemsofsarscov2rapidpointofcaretestswhenusedinmasstesting