Cargando…

Economic cost–utility analysis of stage-directed gastric cancer treatment

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) treatment levies substantial financial burden on health services. Potentially curative surgery with or without chemotherapy is offered to patients with locoregional disease. This study aimed to examine treatment costs related to life-years gained in patients having po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Powell, Arfon G, Wheat, Jennifer R, Eley, Catherine, Robinson, David, Roberts, Stuart A, Lewis, Wyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35022675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab129
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) treatment levies substantial financial burden on health services. Potentially curative surgery with or without chemotherapy is offered to patients with locoregional disease. This study aimed to examine treatment costs related to life-years gained in patients having potentially curative treatment (gastrectomy) and those receiving best supportive care (BSC). METHODS: Some 398 consecutive patients with GC were classified according to treatment modality (116 BSC, 282 gastrectomy). Cost calculations for 1 year’s treatment from referral were made according to network diagnostic, staging and treatment algorithms. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: GC median survival after BSC was 8 months, costing €5413, compared with gastrectomy median survival of 34 months, costing €22 753 for 1 year’s treatment: cost per life-year gained €9319. Cost incurred for stage I GC was €22 434, stage II €23 498, stage III €22 445, and stage IV €22 032. Based on these values, the cost per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) for BSC for stage I GC was –€8335 stage II –€8952, stage III –€11 317, and stage IV –€25 669. CONCLUSION: Potentially curative treatment that included gastrectomy improved OS four-fold compared with BSC and was cost-effective at national thresholds of readiness to pay per QALY.