Cargando…

Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer using polygenic risk models in Asians

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate the performance of a polygenic risk score (PRS) constructed in a Korean male population to predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total 2,702 PCa samples and 7,485 controls were used to discover csPCa susceptible single nucleot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Sang Hun, Kim, Eunae, Woo, Eunjin, Kwon, Eunkyung, Yoon, Sungroh, Kim, Jung Kwon, Lee, Hakmin, Oh, Jong Jin, Lee, Sangchul, Hong, Sung Kyu, Byun, Seok-Soo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34983122
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.20210305
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate the performance of a polygenic risk score (PRS) constructed in a Korean male population to predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total 2,702 PCa samples and 7,485 controls were used to discover csPCa susceptible single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Males with biopsy-proven or post-radical prostatectomy Gleason score 7 or higher were included for analysis. After genotype imputation for quality control, logistic regression models were applied to test association and calculate effect size. Extracted candidate SNPs were further tested to compare predictive performance according to number of SNPs included in the PRS. The best-fit model was validated in an independent cohort of 311 cases and 822 controls. RESULTS: Of the 83 candidate SNPs with significant PCa association reported in previous literature, rs72725879 located in PRNCR1 showed the highest significance for PCa risk (odds ratio, 0.597; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.555–0.641; p=4.3×10(-45)). Thirty-two SNPs within 26 distinct loci were further selected for PRS construction. Best performance was found with the top 29 SNPs, with AUC found to be 0.700 (95% CI, 0.667–0.734). Males with very-high PRS (above the 95th percentile) had a 4.92-fold increased risk for csPCa. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic-specific PRS was developed and validated in Korean males to predict csPCa susceptibility using the largest csPCa sample size in Asia. PRS can be a potential biomarker to predict individual risk. Future multi-ethnic trials are required to further validate our results.