Cargando…

Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: It is of great significance to explore a path for expedited recovery from thoracic surgery for patients undergoing minimally invasive lobectomy to ensure their rapid and smooth recovery and to conserve medical resources. METHODS: We analyzed 629 cases from the Department of Thoracic Surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ni, Haoxiang, Li, Peng, Meng, Zhe, Huang, Tianwei, Shi, Liang, Ni, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071486
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6493
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: It is of great significance to explore a path for expedited recovery from thoracic surgery for patients undergoing minimally invasive lobectomy to ensure their rapid and smooth recovery and to conserve medical resources. METHODS: We analyzed 629 cases from the Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2018 to January 2020. According to the length of postoperative stay (LOS) and perioperative management, the 629 patients were divided into group A [routine management group (RMG)], group B [rapidly recovery group (RRG), LOS >72 h], and group C (RRG, LOS ≤72 h). The t-test and chi-square test were used to compare the postoperative complications (PC), chest tube indwelling time (CTIT), LOS, postoperative opioid dosages (POD), and total costs (TC) of the 3 groups. RESULTS: Compared with the RMG, the LOS, PC, CTIT, POD, and TC of the RRG were statistically significantly ameliorated (P<0.05). When compared with group A, the PC (18.9% vs. 38.8%), LOS (2.74±0.80 vs. 5.70±1.10 d), CTIT (46.1±18.5 vs. 123.6±34.8 h), and TC (¥51,517±7,217 vs. ¥65,781±8,200) of group C were all decreased. Compared with group A, group B had more preoperative complications, less CTIT, but no significant difference in LOS, PC, and TC during hospital stay. Compared with group B, group C had less preoperative complications, and reduced LOS, CTIT, and TC. The POD in group A was significantly higher than that in groups B and C. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an enhanced recover after surgery (ERAS) protocol can reduce the postoperative complications and shorten the LOS. Some high-risk patients cannot be discharged within 72 h after surgery, but their incidence of grade II postoperative lung complications can be decreased and they can benefit from ERAS. Single intercostal nerve block, COX-2 selective inhibitor, and removal of the chest tube as early as possible can improve the ERAS. KEYWORDS: Enhanced recover after surgery (ERAS); video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS); minimally invasive lobectomy