Cargando…

Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: It is of great significance to explore a path for expedited recovery from thoracic surgery for patients undergoing minimally invasive lobectomy to ensure their rapid and smooth recovery and to conserve medical resources. METHODS: We analyzed 629 cases from the Department of Thoracic Surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ni, Haoxiang, Li, Peng, Meng, Zhe, Huang, Tianwei, Shi, Liang, Ni, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071486
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6493
_version_ 1784632521639591936
author Ni, Haoxiang
Li, Peng
Meng, Zhe
Huang, Tianwei
Shi, Liang
Ni, Bin
author_facet Ni, Haoxiang
Li, Peng
Meng, Zhe
Huang, Tianwei
Shi, Liang
Ni, Bin
author_sort Ni, Haoxiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is of great significance to explore a path for expedited recovery from thoracic surgery for patients undergoing minimally invasive lobectomy to ensure their rapid and smooth recovery and to conserve medical resources. METHODS: We analyzed 629 cases from the Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2018 to January 2020. According to the length of postoperative stay (LOS) and perioperative management, the 629 patients were divided into group A [routine management group (RMG)], group B [rapidly recovery group (RRG), LOS >72 h], and group C (RRG, LOS ≤72 h). The t-test and chi-square test were used to compare the postoperative complications (PC), chest tube indwelling time (CTIT), LOS, postoperative opioid dosages (POD), and total costs (TC) of the 3 groups. RESULTS: Compared with the RMG, the LOS, PC, CTIT, POD, and TC of the RRG were statistically significantly ameliorated (P<0.05). When compared with group A, the PC (18.9% vs. 38.8%), LOS (2.74±0.80 vs. 5.70±1.10 d), CTIT (46.1±18.5 vs. 123.6±34.8 h), and TC (¥51,517±7,217 vs. ¥65,781±8,200) of group C were all decreased. Compared with group A, group B had more preoperative complications, less CTIT, but no significant difference in LOS, PC, and TC during hospital stay. Compared with group B, group C had less preoperative complications, and reduced LOS, CTIT, and TC. The POD in group A was significantly higher than that in groups B and C. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an enhanced recover after surgery (ERAS) protocol can reduce the postoperative complications and shorten the LOS. Some high-risk patients cannot be discharged within 72 h after surgery, but their incidence of grade II postoperative lung complications can be decreased and they can benefit from ERAS. Single intercostal nerve block, COX-2 selective inhibitor, and removal of the chest tube as early as possible can improve the ERAS. KEYWORDS: Enhanced recover after surgery (ERAS); video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS); minimally invasive lobectomy
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8756218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87562182022-01-21 Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study Ni, Haoxiang Li, Peng Meng, Zhe Huang, Tianwei Shi, Liang Ni, Bin Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: It is of great significance to explore a path for expedited recovery from thoracic surgery for patients undergoing minimally invasive lobectomy to ensure their rapid and smooth recovery and to conserve medical resources. METHODS: We analyzed 629 cases from the Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2018 to January 2020. According to the length of postoperative stay (LOS) and perioperative management, the 629 patients were divided into group A [routine management group (RMG)], group B [rapidly recovery group (RRG), LOS >72 h], and group C (RRG, LOS ≤72 h). The t-test and chi-square test were used to compare the postoperative complications (PC), chest tube indwelling time (CTIT), LOS, postoperative opioid dosages (POD), and total costs (TC) of the 3 groups. RESULTS: Compared with the RMG, the LOS, PC, CTIT, POD, and TC of the RRG were statistically significantly ameliorated (P<0.05). When compared with group A, the PC (18.9% vs. 38.8%), LOS (2.74±0.80 vs. 5.70±1.10 d), CTIT (46.1±18.5 vs. 123.6±34.8 h), and TC (¥51,517±7,217 vs. ¥65,781±8,200) of group C were all decreased. Compared with group A, group B had more preoperative complications, less CTIT, but no significant difference in LOS, PC, and TC during hospital stay. Compared with group B, group C had less preoperative complications, and reduced LOS, CTIT, and TC. The POD in group A was significantly higher than that in groups B and C. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an enhanced recover after surgery (ERAS) protocol can reduce the postoperative complications and shorten the LOS. Some high-risk patients cannot be discharged within 72 h after surgery, but their incidence of grade II postoperative lung complications can be decreased and they can benefit from ERAS. Single intercostal nerve block, COX-2 selective inhibitor, and removal of the chest tube as early as possible can improve the ERAS. KEYWORDS: Enhanced recover after surgery (ERAS); video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS); minimally invasive lobectomy AME Publishing Company 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8756218/ /pubmed/35071486 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6493 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Ni, Haoxiang
Li, Peng
Meng, Zhe
Huang, Tianwei
Shi, Liang
Ni, Bin
Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study
title Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study
title_full Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study
title_fullStr Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study
title_short Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study
title_sort discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071486
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6493
work_keys_str_mv AT nihaoxiang discussionoftheexperienceandimprovementofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprocedureforminimallyinvasivelobectomyacohortstudy
AT lipeng discussionoftheexperienceandimprovementofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprocedureforminimallyinvasivelobectomyacohortstudy
AT mengzhe discussionoftheexperienceandimprovementofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprocedureforminimallyinvasivelobectomyacohortstudy
AT huangtianwei discussionoftheexperienceandimprovementofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprocedureforminimallyinvasivelobectomyacohortstudy
AT shiliang discussionoftheexperienceandimprovementofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprocedureforminimallyinvasivelobectomyacohortstudy
AT nibin discussionoftheexperienceandimprovementofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprocedureforminimallyinvasivelobectomyacohortstudy