Cargando…

Development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Korea

OBJECTIVES: Predicting diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) at the prehospital stage is challenging; however, using comprehensive prehospital information and machine learning may improve the performance of the predictive model. We developed and tested predictive models for TBI tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Yeongho, Park, Jeong Ho, Hong, Ki Jeong, Ro, Young Sun, Song, Kyoung Jun, Shin, Sang Do
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35022177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055918
_version_ 1784632532943241216
author Choi, Yeongho
Park, Jeong Ho
Hong, Ki Jeong
Ro, Young Sun
Song, Kyoung Jun
Shin, Sang Do
author_facet Choi, Yeongho
Park, Jeong Ho
Hong, Ki Jeong
Ro, Young Sun
Song, Kyoung Jun
Shin, Sang Do
author_sort Choi, Yeongho
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Predicting diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) at the prehospital stage is challenging; however, using comprehensive prehospital information and machine learning may improve the performance of the predictive model. We developed and tested predictive models for TBI that use machine learning algorithms using information that can be obtained in the prehospital stage. DESIGN: This was a multicentre retrospective study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was conducted at three tertiary academic emergency departments (EDs) located in an urban area of South Korea. The data from adult patients with severe trauma who were assessed by emergency medical service providers and transported to three participating hospitals between 2014 to 2018 were analysed. RESULTS: We developed and tested five machine learning algorithms—logistic regression analyses, extreme gradient boosting, support vector machine, random forest and elastic net (EN)—to predict TBI, TBI with intracranial haemorrhage or injury (TBI-I), TBI with ED or admission result of admission or transferred (TBI with non-discharge (TBI-ND)) and TBI with ED or admission result of death (TBI-D). A total of 1169 patients were included in the final analysis, and the proportions of TBI, TBI-I, TBI-ND and TBI-D were 24.0%, 21.5%, 21.3% and 3.7%, respectively. The EN model yielded an area under receiver–operator curve of 0.799 for TBI, 0.844 for TBI-I, 0.811 for TBI-ND and 0.871 for TBI-D. The EN model also yielded the highest specificity and significant reclassification improvement. Variables related to loss of consciousness, Glasgow Coma Scale and light reflex were the three most important variables to predict all outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our results inform the diagnosis and prognosis of TBI. Machine learning models resulted in significant performance improvement over that with logistic regression analyses, and the best performing model was EN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8756263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87562632022-01-26 Development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Korea Choi, Yeongho Park, Jeong Ho Hong, Ki Jeong Ro, Young Sun Song, Kyoung Jun Shin, Sang Do BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: Predicting diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) at the prehospital stage is challenging; however, using comprehensive prehospital information and machine learning may improve the performance of the predictive model. We developed and tested predictive models for TBI that use machine learning algorithms using information that can be obtained in the prehospital stage. DESIGN: This was a multicentre retrospective study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was conducted at three tertiary academic emergency departments (EDs) located in an urban area of South Korea. The data from adult patients with severe trauma who were assessed by emergency medical service providers and transported to three participating hospitals between 2014 to 2018 were analysed. RESULTS: We developed and tested five machine learning algorithms—logistic regression analyses, extreme gradient boosting, support vector machine, random forest and elastic net (EN)—to predict TBI, TBI with intracranial haemorrhage or injury (TBI-I), TBI with ED or admission result of admission or transferred (TBI with non-discharge (TBI-ND)) and TBI with ED or admission result of death (TBI-D). A total of 1169 patients were included in the final analysis, and the proportions of TBI, TBI-I, TBI-ND and TBI-D were 24.0%, 21.5%, 21.3% and 3.7%, respectively. The EN model yielded an area under receiver–operator curve of 0.799 for TBI, 0.844 for TBI-I, 0.811 for TBI-ND and 0.871 for TBI-D. The EN model also yielded the highest specificity and significant reclassification improvement. Variables related to loss of consciousness, Glasgow Coma Scale and light reflex were the three most important variables to predict all outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our results inform the diagnosis and prognosis of TBI. Machine learning models resulted in significant performance improvement over that with logistic regression analyses, and the best performing model was EN. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8756263/ /pubmed/35022177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055918 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Choi, Yeongho
Park, Jeong Ho
Hong, Ki Jeong
Ro, Young Sun
Song, Kyoung Jun
Shin, Sang Do
Development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Korea
title Development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Korea
title_full Development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Korea
title_fullStr Development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Korea
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Korea
title_short Development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Korea
title_sort development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in korea
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35022177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055918
work_keys_str_mv AT choiyeongho developmentandvalidationofaprehospitalstagepredictiontoolfortraumaticbraininjuryamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudyinkorea
AT parkjeongho developmentandvalidationofaprehospitalstagepredictiontoolfortraumaticbraininjuryamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudyinkorea
AT hongkijeong developmentandvalidationofaprehospitalstagepredictiontoolfortraumaticbraininjuryamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudyinkorea
AT royoungsun developmentandvalidationofaprehospitalstagepredictiontoolfortraumaticbraininjuryamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudyinkorea
AT songkyoungjun developmentandvalidationofaprehospitalstagepredictiontoolfortraumaticbraininjuryamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudyinkorea
AT shinsangdo developmentandvalidationofaprehospitalstagepredictiontoolfortraumaticbraininjuryamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudyinkorea