Cargando…
Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
INTRODUCTION: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid non‐invasive ophthalmic imaging technique that identifies corneal nerve fiber damage. Small studies suggest that CCM could be used to assess patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). AIM: To undertake a systematic review and meta‐a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34351711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13643 |
_version_ | 1784632549013716992 |
---|---|
author | Gad, Hoda Petropoulos, Ioannis N Khan, Adnan Ponirakis, Georgios MacDonald, Ross Alam, Uazman Malik, Rayaz A |
author_facet | Gad, Hoda Petropoulos, Ioannis N Khan, Adnan Ponirakis, Georgios MacDonald, Ross Alam, Uazman Malik, Rayaz A |
author_sort | Gad, Hoda |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid non‐invasive ophthalmic imaging technique that identifies corneal nerve fiber damage. Small studies suggest that CCM could be used to assess patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). AIM: To undertake a systematic review and meta‐analysis assessing the diagnostic utility of CCM for sub‐clinical DPN (DPN(−)) and established DPN (DPN(+)). DATA SOURCES: Databases (PubMed, Embase, Central, ProQuest) were searched for studies using CCM in patients with diabetes up to April 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they reported on at least one CCM parameter in patients with diabetes. DATA EXTRACTION: Corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), and inferior whorl length (IWL) were compared between patients with diabetes with and without DPN and controls. Meta‐analysis was undertaken using RevMan V.5.3. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty‐eight studies including ~4,000 participants were included in this meta‐analysis. There were significant reductions in CNFD, CNBD, CNFL, and IWL in DPN(−) vs controls (P < 0.00001), DPN(+) vs controls (P < 0.00001), and DPN(+) vs DPN(−) (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta‐analysis shows that CCM detects small nerve fiber loss in subclinical and clinical DPN and concludes that CCM has good diagnostic utility in DPN. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8756328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87563282022-01-19 Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Gad, Hoda Petropoulos, Ioannis N Khan, Adnan Ponirakis, Georgios MacDonald, Ross Alam, Uazman Malik, Rayaz A J Diabetes Investig Articles INTRODUCTION: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid non‐invasive ophthalmic imaging technique that identifies corneal nerve fiber damage. Small studies suggest that CCM could be used to assess patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). AIM: To undertake a systematic review and meta‐analysis assessing the diagnostic utility of CCM for sub‐clinical DPN (DPN(−)) and established DPN (DPN(+)). DATA SOURCES: Databases (PubMed, Embase, Central, ProQuest) were searched for studies using CCM in patients with diabetes up to April 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they reported on at least one CCM parameter in patients with diabetes. DATA EXTRACTION: Corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), and inferior whorl length (IWL) were compared between patients with diabetes with and without DPN and controls. Meta‐analysis was undertaken using RevMan V.5.3. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty‐eight studies including ~4,000 participants were included in this meta‐analysis. There were significant reductions in CNFD, CNBD, CNFL, and IWL in DPN(−) vs controls (P < 0.00001), DPN(+) vs controls (P < 0.00001), and DPN(+) vs DPN(−) (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta‐analysis shows that CCM detects small nerve fiber loss in subclinical and clinical DPN and concludes that CCM has good diagnostic utility in DPN. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-27 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8756328/ /pubmed/34351711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13643 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Gad, Hoda Petropoulos, Ioannis N Khan, Adnan Ponirakis, Georgios MacDonald, Ross Alam, Uazman Malik, Rayaz A Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34351711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13643 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gadhoda cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT petropoulosioannisn cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT khanadnan cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ponirakisgeorgios cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT macdonaldross cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alamuazman cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT malikrayaza cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |