Cargando…

Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

INTRODUCTION: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid non‐invasive ophthalmic imaging technique that identifies corneal nerve fiber damage. Small studies suggest that CCM could be used to assess patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). AIM: To undertake a systematic review and meta‐a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gad, Hoda, Petropoulos, Ioannis N, Khan, Adnan, Ponirakis, Georgios, MacDonald, Ross, Alam, Uazman, Malik, Rayaz A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34351711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13643
_version_ 1784632549013716992
author Gad, Hoda
Petropoulos, Ioannis N
Khan, Adnan
Ponirakis, Georgios
MacDonald, Ross
Alam, Uazman
Malik, Rayaz A
author_facet Gad, Hoda
Petropoulos, Ioannis N
Khan, Adnan
Ponirakis, Georgios
MacDonald, Ross
Alam, Uazman
Malik, Rayaz A
author_sort Gad, Hoda
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid non‐invasive ophthalmic imaging technique that identifies corneal nerve fiber damage. Small studies suggest that CCM could be used to assess patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). AIM: To undertake a systematic review and meta‐analysis assessing the diagnostic utility of CCM for sub‐clinical DPN (DPN(−)) and established DPN (DPN(+)). DATA SOURCES: Databases (PubMed, Embase, Central, ProQuest) were searched for studies using CCM in patients with diabetes up to April 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they reported on at least one CCM parameter in patients with diabetes. DATA EXTRACTION: Corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), and inferior whorl length (IWL) were compared between patients with diabetes with and without DPN and controls. Meta‐analysis was undertaken using RevMan V.5.3. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty‐eight studies including ~4,000 participants were included in this meta‐analysis. There were significant reductions in CNFD, CNBD, CNFL, and IWL in DPN(−) vs controls (P < 0.00001), DPN(+) vs controls (P < 0.00001), and DPN(+) vs DPN(−) (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta‐analysis shows that CCM detects small nerve fiber loss in subclinical and clinical DPN and concludes that CCM has good diagnostic utility in DPN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8756328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87563282022-01-19 Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Gad, Hoda Petropoulos, Ioannis N Khan, Adnan Ponirakis, Georgios MacDonald, Ross Alam, Uazman Malik, Rayaz A J Diabetes Investig Articles INTRODUCTION: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid non‐invasive ophthalmic imaging technique that identifies corneal nerve fiber damage. Small studies suggest that CCM could be used to assess patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). AIM: To undertake a systematic review and meta‐analysis assessing the diagnostic utility of CCM for sub‐clinical DPN (DPN(−)) and established DPN (DPN(+)). DATA SOURCES: Databases (PubMed, Embase, Central, ProQuest) were searched for studies using CCM in patients with diabetes up to April 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they reported on at least one CCM parameter in patients with diabetes. DATA EXTRACTION: Corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), and inferior whorl length (IWL) were compared between patients with diabetes with and without DPN and controls. Meta‐analysis was undertaken using RevMan V.5.3. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty‐eight studies including ~4,000 participants were included in this meta‐analysis. There were significant reductions in CNFD, CNBD, CNFL, and IWL in DPN(−) vs controls (P < 0.00001), DPN(+) vs controls (P < 0.00001), and DPN(+) vs DPN(−) (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta‐analysis shows that CCM detects small nerve fiber loss in subclinical and clinical DPN and concludes that CCM has good diagnostic utility in DPN. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-27 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8756328/ /pubmed/34351711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13643 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Gad, Hoda
Petropoulos, Ioannis N
Khan, Adnan
Ponirakis, Georgios
MacDonald, Ross
Alam, Uazman
Malik, Rayaz A
Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34351711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13643
work_keys_str_mv AT gadhoda cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT petropoulosioannisn cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khanadnan cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ponirakisgeorgios cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT macdonaldross cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alamuazman cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT malikrayaza cornealconfocalmicroscopyforthediagnosisofdiabeticperipheralneuropathyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis