Cargando…

Analysis of critical report notification from musculoskeletal radiology in a tertiary academic medical institution with a regional trauma center

PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze the prevalence, causes, and clinical settings of 4-year critical radiologic reports (CRRs) notified from the musculoskeletal section of the radiology department. Then, we investigated the communication outcomes. METHODS: This study was approved by our institutional revie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, Tae Ran, Jeong, Yu Mi, Park, So Hyun, Jeon, Ji Young, Lee, Sheen-Woo, Shim, Young Sup
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8758081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35025970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262511
_version_ 1784632825268404224
author Ahn, Tae Ran
Jeong, Yu Mi
Park, So Hyun
Jeon, Ji Young
Lee, Sheen-Woo
Shim, Young Sup
author_facet Ahn, Tae Ran
Jeong, Yu Mi
Park, So Hyun
Jeon, Ji Young
Lee, Sheen-Woo
Shim, Young Sup
author_sort Ahn, Tae Ran
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze the prevalence, causes, and clinical settings of 4-year critical radiologic reports (CRRs) notified from the musculoskeletal section of the radiology department. Then, we investigated the communication outcomes. METHODS: This study was approved by our institutional review board. We retrospectively included 175 musculoskeletal CRRs from our database between January 2017 and December 2020. The CRRs were analyzed by two musculoskeletal radiologists, who categorized the CRRs by clinical setting (emergency department(ED) patient, outpatient, and inpatient), body part, type of image modality, reason for CRR, incidental lesion, and clinical outcome. The clinical outcome was retrieved from the electronic medical records. RESULTS: The 175 musculoskeletal CRRs accounted for 5.4% of the CRRs (n = 3217) available in the study period. Most CRRs (94.9%, 166/175) corresponded to the musculoskeletal system, while the remaining ones (5.1%, 9/175) corresponded to the non-musculoskeletal system. In addition, the spine, extremities, and thoracic cage accounted for 52.6%, 40.6%, and 1.7% of the musculoskeletal CRRs, respectively. Moreover, most patients presented to the ED (50.3%, 88/175), followed by inpatients (30.9%, 54/175), and outpatients (18.9%, 33/175). The CRR reasons included missed fracture (54.3%), suspected malignancy (16%), clinical emergency (10.3%), unexpected infection/inflammation (11.4%), and others (8%). Furthermore, 11 (6.3%) incidental lesions were not related to the primary imaging purpose. Referring clinicians actively acknowledged 80% of the CRRs. The loss to follow-up action was the highest in the ED patients (35.2%, 31/88; p < 0.001), being significantly higher than that in outpatients (6.1%, 2/33) and inpatients (3.7%, 2/54). CONCLUSION: Missed fractures were the most common cause of musculoskeletal CRRs. ED showed prevalence in musculoskeletal CRRs and reflected the highest loss to follow-up action. ED physicians should pay more attention to CRRs to enhance patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8758081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87580812022-01-14 Analysis of critical report notification from musculoskeletal radiology in a tertiary academic medical institution with a regional trauma center Ahn, Tae Ran Jeong, Yu Mi Park, So Hyun Jeon, Ji Young Lee, Sheen-Woo Shim, Young Sup PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: We aimed to analyze the prevalence, causes, and clinical settings of 4-year critical radiologic reports (CRRs) notified from the musculoskeletal section of the radiology department. Then, we investigated the communication outcomes. METHODS: This study was approved by our institutional review board. We retrospectively included 175 musculoskeletal CRRs from our database between January 2017 and December 2020. The CRRs were analyzed by two musculoskeletal radiologists, who categorized the CRRs by clinical setting (emergency department(ED) patient, outpatient, and inpatient), body part, type of image modality, reason for CRR, incidental lesion, and clinical outcome. The clinical outcome was retrieved from the electronic medical records. RESULTS: The 175 musculoskeletal CRRs accounted for 5.4% of the CRRs (n = 3217) available in the study period. Most CRRs (94.9%, 166/175) corresponded to the musculoskeletal system, while the remaining ones (5.1%, 9/175) corresponded to the non-musculoskeletal system. In addition, the spine, extremities, and thoracic cage accounted for 52.6%, 40.6%, and 1.7% of the musculoskeletal CRRs, respectively. Moreover, most patients presented to the ED (50.3%, 88/175), followed by inpatients (30.9%, 54/175), and outpatients (18.9%, 33/175). The CRR reasons included missed fracture (54.3%), suspected malignancy (16%), clinical emergency (10.3%), unexpected infection/inflammation (11.4%), and others (8%). Furthermore, 11 (6.3%) incidental lesions were not related to the primary imaging purpose. Referring clinicians actively acknowledged 80% of the CRRs. The loss to follow-up action was the highest in the ED patients (35.2%, 31/88; p < 0.001), being significantly higher than that in outpatients (6.1%, 2/33) and inpatients (3.7%, 2/54). CONCLUSION: Missed fractures were the most common cause of musculoskeletal CRRs. ED showed prevalence in musculoskeletal CRRs and reflected the highest loss to follow-up action. ED physicians should pay more attention to CRRs to enhance patient care. Public Library of Science 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8758081/ /pubmed/35025970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262511 Text en © 2022 Ahn et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ahn, Tae Ran
Jeong, Yu Mi
Park, So Hyun
Jeon, Ji Young
Lee, Sheen-Woo
Shim, Young Sup
Analysis of critical report notification from musculoskeletal radiology in a tertiary academic medical institution with a regional trauma center
title Analysis of critical report notification from musculoskeletal radiology in a tertiary academic medical institution with a regional trauma center
title_full Analysis of critical report notification from musculoskeletal radiology in a tertiary academic medical institution with a regional trauma center
title_fullStr Analysis of critical report notification from musculoskeletal radiology in a tertiary academic medical institution with a regional trauma center
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of critical report notification from musculoskeletal radiology in a tertiary academic medical institution with a regional trauma center
title_short Analysis of critical report notification from musculoskeletal radiology in a tertiary academic medical institution with a regional trauma center
title_sort analysis of critical report notification from musculoskeletal radiology in a tertiary academic medical institution with a regional trauma center
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8758081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35025970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262511
work_keys_str_mv AT ahntaeran analysisofcriticalreportnotificationfrommusculoskeletalradiologyinatertiaryacademicmedicalinstitutionwitharegionaltraumacenter
AT jeongyumi analysisofcriticalreportnotificationfrommusculoskeletalradiologyinatertiaryacademicmedicalinstitutionwitharegionaltraumacenter
AT parksohyun analysisofcriticalreportnotificationfrommusculoskeletalradiologyinatertiaryacademicmedicalinstitutionwitharegionaltraumacenter
AT jeonjiyoung analysisofcriticalreportnotificationfrommusculoskeletalradiologyinatertiaryacademicmedicalinstitutionwitharegionaltraumacenter
AT leesheenwoo analysisofcriticalreportnotificationfrommusculoskeletalradiologyinatertiaryacademicmedicalinstitutionwitharegionaltraumacenter
AT shimyoungsup analysisofcriticalreportnotificationfrommusculoskeletalradiologyinatertiaryacademicmedicalinstitutionwitharegionaltraumacenter