Cargando…
Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: Data from a real-life setting
BACKGROUND: The use of single-tablet regimens (STRs) in HIV treatment is ubiquitous. However, reintroducing the (generic) components as multi-tablet regimens (MTRs) could be an interesting cost-reducing strategy. It is essential to involve patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) to examine the effe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8758085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35025957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262533 |
_version_ | 1784632826229948416 |
---|---|
author | Degroote, Sophie Vandekerckhove, Linos Vogelaers, Dirk Vanden Bulcke, Charlotte |
author_facet | Degroote, Sophie Vandekerckhove, Linos Vogelaers, Dirk Vanden Bulcke, Charlotte |
author_sort | Degroote, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of single-tablet regimens (STRs) in HIV treatment is ubiquitous. However, reintroducing the (generic) components as multi-tablet regimens (MTRs) could be an interesting cost-reducing strategy. It is essential to involve patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) to examine the effects of such an approach. Hence, this study compared PROs of people living with HIV taking an STR versus a MTR in a real world setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This longitudinal study included 188 people living with HIV. 132 remained on a MTR and 56 switched to an STR. At baseline, months 1-3-6-12-18 and 24, participants filled in questionnaires on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), depressive symptoms, HIV symptoms, neurocognitive complaints (NCC), treatment satisfaction and adherence. Generalized linear mixed models and generalized estimation equations mixed models were built. RESULTS: Clinical parameters and PROs of the two groups were comparable at baseline. Neurocognitive complaints and treatment satisfaction did differ over time among the groups. In the STR-group, the odds of having NCC increased monthly by 4,1% as compared to the MTR-group (p = 0.035). Moreover, people taking an STR were more satisfied with their treatment after 6 months: the median change score was high: 24 (IQR 7,5–29). Further, treatment satisfaction showed a contrary evolution in the groups: the estimated state score of the STR-group increased by 3,3 while it decreased by 0,2 in the MTR-group (p = 0.003). No differences over time between the groups were observed with regard to HRQoL, HIV symptoms, depressive symptoms and adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Neurocognitive complaints were more frequently reported among people on an STR versus MTR. This finding contrasts with the higher treatment satisfaction in the STR-group over time. The long-term effects of both PROs should guide the decision-making on STRs vs. (generic) MTRs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8758085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87580852022-01-14 Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: Data from a real-life setting Degroote, Sophie Vandekerckhove, Linos Vogelaers, Dirk Vanden Bulcke, Charlotte PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of single-tablet regimens (STRs) in HIV treatment is ubiquitous. However, reintroducing the (generic) components as multi-tablet regimens (MTRs) could be an interesting cost-reducing strategy. It is essential to involve patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) to examine the effects of such an approach. Hence, this study compared PROs of people living with HIV taking an STR versus a MTR in a real world setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This longitudinal study included 188 people living with HIV. 132 remained on a MTR and 56 switched to an STR. At baseline, months 1-3-6-12-18 and 24, participants filled in questionnaires on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), depressive symptoms, HIV symptoms, neurocognitive complaints (NCC), treatment satisfaction and adherence. Generalized linear mixed models and generalized estimation equations mixed models were built. RESULTS: Clinical parameters and PROs of the two groups were comparable at baseline. Neurocognitive complaints and treatment satisfaction did differ over time among the groups. In the STR-group, the odds of having NCC increased monthly by 4,1% as compared to the MTR-group (p = 0.035). Moreover, people taking an STR were more satisfied with their treatment after 6 months: the median change score was high: 24 (IQR 7,5–29). Further, treatment satisfaction showed a contrary evolution in the groups: the estimated state score of the STR-group increased by 3,3 while it decreased by 0,2 in the MTR-group (p = 0.003). No differences over time between the groups were observed with regard to HRQoL, HIV symptoms, depressive symptoms and adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Neurocognitive complaints were more frequently reported among people on an STR versus MTR. This finding contrasts with the higher treatment satisfaction in the STR-group over time. The long-term effects of both PROs should guide the decision-making on STRs vs. (generic) MTRs. Public Library of Science 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8758085/ /pubmed/35025957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262533 Text en © 2022 Degroote et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Degroote, Sophie Vandekerckhove, Linos Vogelaers, Dirk Vanden Bulcke, Charlotte Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: Data from a real-life setting |
title | Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: Data from a real-life setting |
title_full | Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: Data from a real-life setting |
title_fullStr | Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: Data from a real-life setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: Data from a real-life setting |
title_short | Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: Data from a real-life setting |
title_sort | patient-reported outcomes among people living with hiv on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: data from a real-life setting |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8758085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35025957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262533 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degrootesophie patientreportedoutcomesamongpeoplelivingwithhivonsingleversusmultitabletregimensdatafromareallifesetting AT vandekerckhovelinos patientreportedoutcomesamongpeoplelivingwithhivonsingleversusmultitabletregimensdatafromareallifesetting AT vogelaersdirk patientreportedoutcomesamongpeoplelivingwithhivonsingleversusmultitabletregimensdatafromareallifesetting AT vandenbulckecharlotte patientreportedoutcomesamongpeoplelivingwithhivonsingleversusmultitabletregimensdatafromareallifesetting |