Cargando…
Modeling individual development plans, mentoring support, and career preparedness relationships among Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) trainees in the life sciences
Background: As greater career development support for doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers has been emphasized, the individual development plan (IDP) has become a recommended mentoring tool. However, little is known about the effect of IDPs on mentoring and career development. This study p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8758970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083035 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53705.2 |
_version_ | 1784633015748526080 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Chi-Ning Patterson, Clinton A. Vanderford, Nathan L. Evans, Teresa M. |
author_facet | Chang, Chi-Ning Patterson, Clinton A. Vanderford, Nathan L. Evans, Teresa M. |
author_sort | Chang, Chi-Ning |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: As greater career development support for doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers has been emphasized, the individual development plan (IDP) has become a recommended mentoring tool. However, little is known about the effect of IDPs on mentoring and career development. This study proposed two conceptual models to examine the interrelationships among the use of IDPs, mentoring support, and career preparedness with a diverse sample of doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers in the life sciences. Methods: The data leveraged for this study was collected over a three-month period, March 2016 to June 2016, as part of a cross-sectional, online survey. The survey was distributed through social media and direct email to participants enrolled in life/biological/medical or physical/applied doctoral programs at U.S. institutions. To test the proposed conceptual models, this study employed the design-based multilevel structural equation modeling. Results: The analytic sample comprised 660 doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers in the life sciences from 91 institutions. The results suggested that 1) using the IDP could enhance mentoring support and career preparedness of doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers; 2) greater mentoring support and career preparedness would motivate mentees to continue utilizing the IDP with their principal investigator (PI) or advisor; and 3) females, postdoctoral researchers, and international scholars might need more support throughout the mentoring and career development process. Conclusions: This research offered empirical evidence for how an IDP, mentorship, and career preparedness interact. Findings revealed the IDP enhances mentoring support and career preparedness, as well as mentoring support and career preparedness predict IDP use. We conclude the IDP is an important mentorship tool that enhances trainees’ overall career preparation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8758970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87589702022-01-25 Modeling individual development plans, mentoring support, and career preparedness relationships among Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) trainees in the life sciences Chang, Chi-Ning Patterson, Clinton A. Vanderford, Nathan L. Evans, Teresa M. F1000Res Research Article Background: As greater career development support for doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers has been emphasized, the individual development plan (IDP) has become a recommended mentoring tool. However, little is known about the effect of IDPs on mentoring and career development. This study proposed two conceptual models to examine the interrelationships among the use of IDPs, mentoring support, and career preparedness with a diverse sample of doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers in the life sciences. Methods: The data leveraged for this study was collected over a three-month period, March 2016 to June 2016, as part of a cross-sectional, online survey. The survey was distributed through social media and direct email to participants enrolled in life/biological/medical or physical/applied doctoral programs at U.S. institutions. To test the proposed conceptual models, this study employed the design-based multilevel structural equation modeling. Results: The analytic sample comprised 660 doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers in the life sciences from 91 institutions. The results suggested that 1) using the IDP could enhance mentoring support and career preparedness of doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers; 2) greater mentoring support and career preparedness would motivate mentees to continue utilizing the IDP with their principal investigator (PI) or advisor; and 3) females, postdoctoral researchers, and international scholars might need more support throughout the mentoring and career development process. Conclusions: This research offered empirical evidence for how an IDP, mentorship, and career preparedness interact. Findings revealed the IDP enhances mentoring support and career preparedness, as well as mentoring support and career preparedness predict IDP use. We conclude the IDP is an important mentorship tool that enhances trainees’ overall career preparation. F1000 Research Limited 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8758970/ /pubmed/35083035 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53705.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Chang CN et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chang, Chi-Ning Patterson, Clinton A. Vanderford, Nathan L. Evans, Teresa M. Modeling individual development plans, mentoring support, and career preparedness relationships among Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) trainees in the life sciences |
title | Modeling individual development plans, mentoring support, and career preparedness relationships among Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) trainees in the life sciences |
title_full | Modeling individual development plans, mentoring support, and career preparedness relationships among Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) trainees in the life sciences |
title_fullStr | Modeling individual development plans, mentoring support, and career preparedness relationships among Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) trainees in the life sciences |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling individual development plans, mentoring support, and career preparedness relationships among Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) trainees in the life sciences |
title_short | Modeling individual development plans, mentoring support, and career preparedness relationships among Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) trainees in the life sciences |
title_sort | modeling individual development plans, mentoring support, and career preparedness relationships among doctor of philosophy (ph.d.) trainees in the life sciences |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8758970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083035 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53705.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changchining modelingindividualdevelopmentplansmentoringsupportandcareerpreparednessrelationshipsamongdoctorofphilosophyphdtraineesinthelifesciences AT pattersonclintona modelingindividualdevelopmentplansmentoringsupportandcareerpreparednessrelationshipsamongdoctorofphilosophyphdtraineesinthelifesciences AT vanderfordnathanl modelingindividualdevelopmentplansmentoringsupportandcareerpreparednessrelationshipsamongdoctorofphilosophyphdtraineesinthelifesciences AT evansteresam modelingindividualdevelopmentplansmentoringsupportandcareerpreparednessrelationshipsamongdoctorofphilosophyphdtraineesinthelifesciences |